科索沃与阿尔巴尼亚GDM衡器校准之比较

Luljeta Disha, D. Bulku, A. Deda
{"title":"科索沃与阿尔巴尼亚GDM衡器校准之比较","authors":"Luljeta Disha, D. Bulku, A. Deda","doi":"10.9790/4861-0904016063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The General Directorate of Metrology (GDM) Albania, signed the agreement on collaboration with the Accredited Laboratory ERAMED N.T.SH from Kosovo, to conduct a proficiency testing (PT) in the field of calibration of weghing instrument. Usually testing and calibrating laboratories work with ISO/IEC 17025 standard, one of which requirements is that the laboratories should have quality control procedures for monitoring the validity of tests and calibrations undertaken. It is therefore important that such laboratories should regularly participate in a PT. A weighing instrument with capacity Max = 520 g and resolution d = 0.1mg was the subject of this comparison. The measurements were performed on February 2017, at mass laboratory of GDM. This paper describes and analyzes the comparative results and uncertainties associated obtained by this two laboratories. The aim of this comparison is to verify the competence of ERAMED laboratory in the field of calibration of NAWI (non automatic weighing instrument.) The results are analyzed using normalized errors values (En).","PeriodicalId":14502,"journal":{"name":"IOSR Journal of Applied Physics","volume":"23 1","pages":"60-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison on Weighing Instrument Calibration between Eramed Kosovo and GDM Albania\",\"authors\":\"Luljeta Disha, D. Bulku, A. Deda\",\"doi\":\"10.9790/4861-0904016063\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The General Directorate of Metrology (GDM) Albania, signed the agreement on collaboration with the Accredited Laboratory ERAMED N.T.SH from Kosovo, to conduct a proficiency testing (PT) in the field of calibration of weghing instrument. Usually testing and calibrating laboratories work with ISO/IEC 17025 standard, one of which requirements is that the laboratories should have quality control procedures for monitoring the validity of tests and calibrations undertaken. It is therefore important that such laboratories should regularly participate in a PT. A weighing instrument with capacity Max = 520 g and resolution d = 0.1mg was the subject of this comparison. The measurements were performed on February 2017, at mass laboratory of GDM. This paper describes and analyzes the comparative results and uncertainties associated obtained by this two laboratories. The aim of this comparison is to verify the competence of ERAMED laboratory in the field of calibration of NAWI (non automatic weighing instrument.) The results are analyzed using normalized errors values (En).\",\"PeriodicalId\":14502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IOSR Journal of Applied Physics\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"60-63\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IOSR Journal of Applied Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9790/4861-0904016063\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IOSR Journal of Applied Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9790/4861-0904016063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

阿尔巴尼亚计量总局(GDM)与科索沃认可实验室ERAMED N.T.SH签署合作协议,在计量仪器校准领域进行能力测试。检测和校准实验室通常按照ISO/IEC 17025标准工作,其中一项要求是实验室应具有质量控制程序,以监测所进行的检测和校准的有效性。因此,重要的是这些实验室应定期参加PT。本次比较的对象是容量Max = 520 g,分辨率d = 0.1mg的称重仪。测量于2017年2月在GDM质量实验室进行。本文描述并分析了这两个实验室获得的比较结果和相关不确定度。本次比较的目的是验证ERAMED实验室在非自动衡器校准领域的能力。使用归一化误差值(En)对结果进行分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison on Weighing Instrument Calibration between Eramed Kosovo and GDM Albania
The General Directorate of Metrology (GDM) Albania, signed the agreement on collaboration with the Accredited Laboratory ERAMED N.T.SH from Kosovo, to conduct a proficiency testing (PT) in the field of calibration of weghing instrument. Usually testing and calibrating laboratories work with ISO/IEC 17025 standard, one of which requirements is that the laboratories should have quality control procedures for monitoring the validity of tests and calibrations undertaken. It is therefore important that such laboratories should regularly participate in a PT. A weighing instrument with capacity Max = 520 g and resolution d = 0.1mg was the subject of this comparison. The measurements were performed on February 2017, at mass laboratory of GDM. This paper describes and analyzes the comparative results and uncertainties associated obtained by this two laboratories. The aim of this comparison is to verify the competence of ERAMED laboratory in the field of calibration of NAWI (non automatic weighing instrument.) The results are analyzed using normalized errors values (En).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Studies Of Gamma Glycine Crystlas Grown In The Aqueous Solution Of Zinc Chloride Explanation of the Concept of Dark Energy and Its Role in Acceleratedexpansion of Universe Comparative study of different immobilization of strontium inLiSr2(PO4)3 crystal through hydrothermal process Solubility and Density of Silver Iodide in Water and DMF at Various Temperatures as Function of Potassium Iodide. Electronic spectral studies and thermodynamic parameters of 5- Fluoro -1, 3- Dimethyl Uracil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1