为什么英国的大学生要从作文作坊购买作业

IF 0.6 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Critical Education Pub Date : 2020-02-17 DOI:10.14288/CE.V11I10.186534
M. Naughton
{"title":"为什么英国的大学生要从作文作坊购买作业","authors":"M. Naughton","doi":"10.14288/CE.V11I10.186534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article considers the growing crisis on a specific form of plagiarism in the UK where students purchase assignments from so called essay mills which they then submit as their own work. It departs from the dominant discourses, however, to highlight the sociological context within which such student plagiarism, termed contract cheating, is occurring. This context revolves around an increasing shortage of graduate jobs and the stress and anxiety caused by the competition for the jobs that are available. It argues that the dominant discourses that simply describe and denounce contract cheating are not only devoid of such a contextual understanding, they work against such an analysis. It concludes that the way to prevent or eradicate such student plagiarism lies not in the criminalisation and punishment of offending businesses or individual miscreates but, rather, in a sociological understanding of why it occurs in the first place, which signals the need for radical reform of the existing social order as it relates to employment and education.","PeriodicalId":10808,"journal":{"name":"Critical Education","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why do university students in the UK buy assignments from essay mills\",\"authors\":\"M. Naughton\",\"doi\":\"10.14288/CE.V11I10.186534\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article considers the growing crisis on a specific form of plagiarism in the UK where students purchase assignments from so called essay mills which they then submit as their own work. It departs from the dominant discourses, however, to highlight the sociological context within which such student plagiarism, termed contract cheating, is occurring. This context revolves around an increasing shortage of graduate jobs and the stress and anxiety caused by the competition for the jobs that are available. It argues that the dominant discourses that simply describe and denounce contract cheating are not only devoid of such a contextual understanding, they work against such an analysis. It concludes that the way to prevent or eradicate such student plagiarism lies not in the criminalisation and punishment of offending businesses or individual miscreates but, rather, in a sociological understanding of why it occurs in the first place, which signals the need for radical reform of the existing social order as it relates to employment and education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Education\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14288/CE.V11I10.186534\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14288/CE.V11I10.186534","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

这篇文章认为在英国剽窃的一种特定形式的日益增长的危机,学生购买作业从所谓的论文工厂,他们然后提交作为自己的工作。然而,它偏离了主流话语,强调了这种被称为合同作弊的学生剽窃行为发生的社会学背景。这一背景围绕着毕业生就业机会的日益短缺以及对现有工作的竞争所造成的压力和焦虑。它认为,仅仅描述和谴责合同欺诈的主流话语不仅缺乏这样的语境理解,而且不利于这样的分析。它的结论是,防止或根除这种学生抄袭的方法不在于将违规企业或个人的不当行为定罪和惩罚,而在于从社会学的角度理解这种行为首先发生的原因,这表明需要对现有的社会秩序进行彻底改革,因为它与就业和教育有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Why do university students in the UK buy assignments from essay mills
This article considers the growing crisis on a specific form of plagiarism in the UK where students purchase assignments from so called essay mills which they then submit as their own work. It departs from the dominant discourses, however, to highlight the sociological context within which such student plagiarism, termed contract cheating, is occurring. This context revolves around an increasing shortage of graduate jobs and the stress and anxiety caused by the competition for the jobs that are available. It argues that the dominant discourses that simply describe and denounce contract cheating are not only devoid of such a contextual understanding, they work against such an analysis. It concludes that the way to prevent or eradicate such student plagiarism lies not in the criminalisation and punishment of offending businesses or individual miscreates but, rather, in a sociological understanding of why it occurs in the first place, which signals the need for radical reform of the existing social order as it relates to employment and education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Education
Critical Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
30.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Critique of the Critical Critique of Critical Pedagogy: Freire, Suchodolski and the Materialist Pedagogy of Emancipation How to Get a Life: Humanities Education in the age of Neoliberal Exhaustion Teaching as Intellectual Solidarity Academic Ableism and Students with Intellectual/Development Disabilities: “Disabled or Not, People Just Want to Feel Welcome”: Stories of Belonging from College Students with Intellectual Disability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1