{"title":"重新审视宪法影响","authors":"J. Goldsworthy","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2142263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I revisit the question of the nature of implications and the proper methodology for identifying them. Debate about the legal foundations of the implied freedom of political speech may for practical purposes be otiose, but my interests have always been theoretical as well as practical. The study of implications can illuminate the nature of constitutional interpretation in general, both as it is actually practiced, and as an aspect of the ideals of constitutionalism and the rule of law.","PeriodicalId":83293,"journal":{"name":"The University of Queensland law journal","volume":"29 1","pages":"9-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Constitutional Implications Revisited\",\"authors\":\"J. Goldsworthy\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2142263\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I revisit the question of the nature of implications and the proper methodology for identifying them. Debate about the legal foundations of the implied freedom of political speech may for practical purposes be otiose, but my interests have always been theoretical as well as practical. The study of implications can illuminate the nature of constitutional interpretation in general, both as it is actually practiced, and as an aspect of the ideals of constitutionalism and the rule of law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":83293,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The University of Queensland law journal\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"9-34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The University of Queensland law journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2142263\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The University of Queensland law journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2142263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
I revisit the question of the nature of implications and the proper methodology for identifying them. Debate about the legal foundations of the implied freedom of political speech may for practical purposes be otiose, but my interests have always been theoretical as well as practical. The study of implications can illuminate the nature of constitutional interpretation in general, both as it is actually practiced, and as an aspect of the ideals of constitutionalism and the rule of law.