重新审视宪法影响

J. Goldsworthy
{"title":"重新审视宪法影响","authors":"J. Goldsworthy","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2142263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I revisit the question of the nature of implications and the proper methodology for identifying them. Debate about the legal foundations of the implied freedom of political speech may for practical purposes be otiose, but my interests have always been theoretical as well as practical. The study of implications can illuminate the nature of constitutional interpretation in general, both as it is actually practiced, and as an aspect of the ideals of constitutionalism and the rule of law.","PeriodicalId":83293,"journal":{"name":"The University of Queensland law journal","volume":"29 1","pages":"9-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Constitutional Implications Revisited\",\"authors\":\"J. Goldsworthy\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2142263\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I revisit the question of the nature of implications and the proper methodology for identifying them. Debate about the legal foundations of the implied freedom of political speech may for practical purposes be otiose, but my interests have always been theoretical as well as practical. The study of implications can illuminate the nature of constitutional interpretation in general, both as it is actually practiced, and as an aspect of the ideals of constitutionalism and the rule of law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":83293,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The University of Queensland law journal\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"9-34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The University of Queensland law journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2142263\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The University of Queensland law journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2142263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

我将重新讨论影响的本质问题以及确定影响的适当方法。关于隐含的政治言论自由的法律基础的争论,从实际目的来看可能是多余的,但我的兴趣一直是理论和实践。对其含义的研究可以从总体上阐明宪法解释的本质,无论是在实际实践中,还是作为宪政和法治理想的一个方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Constitutional Implications Revisited
I revisit the question of the nature of implications and the proper methodology for identifying them. Debate about the legal foundations of the implied freedom of political speech may for practical purposes be otiose, but my interests have always been theoretical as well as practical. The study of implications can illuminate the nature of constitutional interpretation in general, both as it is actually practiced, and as an aspect of the ideals of constitutionalism and the rule of law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Robodebt and Novel Data Technologies in the Public Sector The Territorial Scope of Australia’s Unfair Contract Terms Provisions Regulating Decisions that Lead to Loss of Life in Workplaces Lending on the Edge Substantive Equality and the Possibilities of the Queensland Human Rights Act 2019
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1