四轴飞行器或语料库

Q2 Social Sciences LIBER Quarterly Pub Date : 2018-11-01 DOI:10.18352/LQ.10255
Viola Voß, G. Hamrin
{"title":"四轴飞行器或语料库","authors":"Viola Voß, G. Hamrin","doi":"10.18352/LQ.10255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During an international library conference in 2017 the authors had many productive exchanges about similarities and differences in Swedish and German higher-education libraries. Since research data management (RDM) is an emerging topic on both sides of the Baltic Sea, we find it valuable to compare strategies, services, and workflows to learn from each other’s practices. Aim : In this paper, we aim to compare the practices and needs of small-scale data producers in engineering and the humanities. In particular, we try to answer the following research questions: • What kind of data do the small-scale data producers produce? • What do these producers need in terms of RDM support? • What then can we librarians help them with? Hypothesis : Our research hypothesis is that small-scale data producers have similar needs in engineering and the humanities. This hypothesis is based on the similarities in demands from funding agencies on (open) research data and on the assumption that research in different subjects often creates results which are different in content but similar in structure. Method : We study the current strategies, practices, and services of our respective universities (KTH Royal Institute of Technology Stockholm and Westfalische Wilhelms-Universitat Munster). We also study the work and initiatives done on a more advanced level by universities, libraries, and other organisations in Sweden and Germany. Results : The paper will give an overview of how we did the groundwork for the initial services provided by our libraries. We focus on what we are doing and why we are doing it. We find that we are following in the leading footsteps of other university libraries. The experiences shared by colleagues help us to adapt their best practices to our local demands, making them better practices for KTH and WWU researchers. Limitation : We restrict ourselves to studying only researchers who create data on a small scale, since the large-scale data producers handle the RDM on their own.","PeriodicalId":39179,"journal":{"name":"LIBER Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quadcopters or Linguistic Corpora\",\"authors\":\"Viola Voß, G. Hamrin\",\"doi\":\"10.18352/LQ.10255\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"During an international library conference in 2017 the authors had many productive exchanges about similarities and differences in Swedish and German higher-education libraries. Since research data management (RDM) is an emerging topic on both sides of the Baltic Sea, we find it valuable to compare strategies, services, and workflows to learn from each other’s practices. Aim : In this paper, we aim to compare the practices and needs of small-scale data producers in engineering and the humanities. In particular, we try to answer the following research questions: • What kind of data do the small-scale data producers produce? • What do these producers need in terms of RDM support? • What then can we librarians help them with? Hypothesis : Our research hypothesis is that small-scale data producers have similar needs in engineering and the humanities. This hypothesis is based on the similarities in demands from funding agencies on (open) research data and on the assumption that research in different subjects often creates results which are different in content but similar in structure. Method : We study the current strategies, practices, and services of our respective universities (KTH Royal Institute of Technology Stockholm and Westfalische Wilhelms-Universitat Munster). We also study the work and initiatives done on a more advanced level by universities, libraries, and other organisations in Sweden and Germany. Results : The paper will give an overview of how we did the groundwork for the initial services provided by our libraries. We focus on what we are doing and why we are doing it. We find that we are following in the leading footsteps of other university libraries. The experiences shared by colleagues help us to adapt their best practices to our local demands, making them better practices for KTH and WWU researchers. Limitation : We restrict ourselves to studying only researchers who create data on a small scale, since the large-scale data producers handle the RDM on their own.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39179,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LIBER Quarterly\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LIBER Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18352/LQ.10255\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LIBER Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18352/LQ.10255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在2017年的一次国际图书馆会议上,作者就瑞典和德国高等教育图书馆的异同进行了富有成效的交流。由于研究数据管理(RDM)在波罗的海两岸都是一个新兴的主题,我们发现比较策略、服务和工作流程以学习彼此的实践是很有价值的。目的:在本文中,我们旨在比较工程和人文学科中小规模数据生产者的实践和需求。特别是,我们试图回答以下研究问题:•小规模数据生产者生产什么样的数据?•在RDM支持方面,这些生产商需要什么?•那么我们图书馆员能帮到他们什么呢?假设:我们的研究假设是,小规模的数据生产者在工程和人文科学方面有类似的需求。这一假设是基于资助机构对(公开)研究数据的相似需求,以及不同学科的研究往往会产生内容不同但结构相似的结果。方法:我们研究了我们各自大学(斯德哥尔摩皇家理工学院和威斯特法利施-明斯特大学)的当前战略、实践和服务。我们还研究了瑞典和德国的大学、图书馆和其他组织在更高水平上所做的工作和倡议。结果:本文将概述我们如何为图书馆提供的初始服务做基础工作。我们专注于我们正在做的事情以及我们为什么要这样做。我们发现我们正在跟随其他大学图书馆的脚步。同事们分享的经验有助我们将他们的最佳做法应用于本地需求,使之更适合香港理工大学和世界水大的研究人员。限制:我们限制自己只研究小规模数据的研究人员,因为大规模数据生产者自己处理RDM。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quadcopters or Linguistic Corpora
During an international library conference in 2017 the authors had many productive exchanges about similarities and differences in Swedish and German higher-education libraries. Since research data management (RDM) is an emerging topic on both sides of the Baltic Sea, we find it valuable to compare strategies, services, and workflows to learn from each other’s practices. Aim : In this paper, we aim to compare the practices and needs of small-scale data producers in engineering and the humanities. In particular, we try to answer the following research questions: • What kind of data do the small-scale data producers produce? • What do these producers need in terms of RDM support? • What then can we librarians help them with? Hypothesis : Our research hypothesis is that small-scale data producers have similar needs in engineering and the humanities. This hypothesis is based on the similarities in demands from funding agencies on (open) research data and on the assumption that research in different subjects often creates results which are different in content but similar in structure. Method : We study the current strategies, practices, and services of our respective universities (KTH Royal Institute of Technology Stockholm and Westfalische Wilhelms-Universitat Munster). We also study the work and initiatives done on a more advanced level by universities, libraries, and other organisations in Sweden and Germany. Results : The paper will give an overview of how we did the groundwork for the initial services provided by our libraries. We focus on what we are doing and why we are doing it. We find that we are following in the leading footsteps of other university libraries. The experiences shared by colleagues help us to adapt their best practices to our local demands, making them better practices for KTH and WWU researchers. Limitation : We restrict ourselves to studying only researchers who create data on a small scale, since the large-scale data producers handle the RDM on their own.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
LIBER Quarterly
LIBER Quarterly Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Nitpicking online knowledge representations of governmental leadership. The case of Belgian prime ministers in Wikipedia and Wikidata. Applied and conceptual approaches to evidence-based practice in research and academic libraries Revealing Reviewers’ Identities as Part of Open Peer Review and Analysis of the Review Reports Lessons From the Open Library of Humanities Patterns for searching data on the web across different research communities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1