西蒙·温泽尔伯格《76度假》的修辞与大屠杀戏剧中的暴行美学

IF 0.2 4区 文学 0 LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM Journal of Literary Studies Pub Date : 2021-04-03 DOI:10.1080/02564718.2021.1923729
O. Seda
{"title":"西蒙·温泽尔伯格《76度假》的修辞与大屠杀戏剧中的暴行美学","authors":"O. Seda","doi":"10.1080/02564718.2021.1923729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary The question of whether or not it is proper to create fictionalised works of art out of traumatic episodes of human history such as the Nazi Holocaust of the 2nd World or the Rwandan genocide of 1994 is one which continues to trouble mankind. This dilemma was famously posed by Theodor Adorno (1965) and Lawrence Langer (1975) when they questioned the potential dangers and the morality of “re-victimising the victim” (Hove 2015) through the production and propagation of artistic works that depict intense human suffering such as that which is wrought by genocide. Although Langer poses the question; is it possible and ethical to depict human tragedy without trivialising or exploiting the scale of the suffering and; what moral responsibility do artists have in undertaking such a task, he nevertheless suggests the adoption of an ‘aesthetics of atrocity’ which will enable these art forms to present landscapes of despair in such a way as to coax the reader into a mixture of credulity and complicity even as they also assist humanity to engage and transcend these tragic events in a more positive way.","PeriodicalId":43700,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Literary Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Rhetoric of Shimon Wincelberg’s Resort ‘76 and the Aesthetics of Atrocity in Drama of the Holocaust\",\"authors\":\"O. Seda\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02564718.2021.1923729\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary The question of whether or not it is proper to create fictionalised works of art out of traumatic episodes of human history such as the Nazi Holocaust of the 2nd World or the Rwandan genocide of 1994 is one which continues to trouble mankind. This dilemma was famously posed by Theodor Adorno (1965) and Lawrence Langer (1975) when they questioned the potential dangers and the morality of “re-victimising the victim” (Hove 2015) through the production and propagation of artistic works that depict intense human suffering such as that which is wrought by genocide. Although Langer poses the question; is it possible and ethical to depict human tragedy without trivialising or exploiting the scale of the suffering and; what moral responsibility do artists have in undertaking such a task, he nevertheless suggests the adoption of an ‘aesthetics of atrocity’ which will enable these art forms to present landscapes of despair in such a way as to coax the reader into a mixture of credulity and complicity even as they also assist humanity to engage and transcend these tragic events in a more positive way.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43700,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Literary Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Literary Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1092\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02564718.2021.1923729\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Literary Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1092","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02564718.2021.1923729","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据人类历史上的创伤事件(如纳粹对第二次世界的大屠杀或1994年卢旺达的种族灭绝)创作虚构的艺术作品是否合适,这个问题一直困扰着人类。西奥多·阿多诺(Theodor Adorno, 1965)和劳伦斯·兰格(Lawrence Langer, 1975)提出了这个著名的困境,他们质疑通过制作和传播描绘种族灭绝等人类痛苦的艺术作品,“再次伤害受害者”(Hove, 2015)的潜在危险和道德。尽管兰格提出了这个问题;在描绘人类悲剧时,不轻视或利用苦难的规模,这是否可能和合乎道德?艺术家在承担这样的任务时有什么道德责任,他建议采用一种“暴行美学”,这将使这些艺术形式能够以这样一种方式呈现绝望的风景,从而诱使读者轻信和共谋,即使它们也帮助人类以更积极的方式参与和超越这些悲剧事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Rhetoric of Shimon Wincelberg’s Resort ‘76 and the Aesthetics of Atrocity in Drama of the Holocaust
Summary The question of whether or not it is proper to create fictionalised works of art out of traumatic episodes of human history such as the Nazi Holocaust of the 2nd World or the Rwandan genocide of 1994 is one which continues to trouble mankind. This dilemma was famously posed by Theodor Adorno (1965) and Lawrence Langer (1975) when they questioned the potential dangers and the morality of “re-victimising the victim” (Hove 2015) through the production and propagation of artistic works that depict intense human suffering such as that which is wrought by genocide. Although Langer poses the question; is it possible and ethical to depict human tragedy without trivialising or exploiting the scale of the suffering and; what moral responsibility do artists have in undertaking such a task, he nevertheless suggests the adoption of an ‘aesthetics of atrocity’ which will enable these art forms to present landscapes of despair in such a way as to coax the reader into a mixture of credulity and complicity even as they also assist humanity to engage and transcend these tragic events in a more positive way.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Literary Studies publishes and globally disseminates original and cutting-edge research informed by Literary and Cultural Theory. The Journal is an independent quarterly publication owned and published by the South African Literary Society in partnership with Unisa Press and Taylor & Francis. It is housed and produced in the division Theory of Literature at the University of South Africa and is accredited and subsidised by the South African Department of Higher Education and Training. The aim of the journal is to publish articles and full-length review essays informed by Literary Theory in the General Literary Theory subject area and mostly covering Formalism, New Criticism, Semiotics, Structuralism, Marxism, Poststructuralism, Psychoanalysis, Gender studies, New Historicism, Ecocriticism, Animal Studies, Reception Theory, Comparative Literature, Narrative Theory, Drama Theory, Poetry Theory, and Biography and Autobiography.
期刊最新文献
Refiguring in Black, by Tendayi Sithole The Typewriter’s Tale: Re-Exploring the Historical Figure of Henry James through Fiction Blackface on the South African Stage Culpability and Nature-Nature Infractions in Select Poems in Tanure Ojaide’s Narrow Escapes: A Poetic Diary of the Coronavirus Pandemic LGBTQ+ Literature in the West: From Ancient Times to the Twenty-First Century, by Robert C. Evans
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1