死对谁有好处?

IF 0.4 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Departures in Critical Qualitative Research Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI:10.1525/dcqr.2021.10.3.5
Jennifer Tran, Jillian A. Tullis
{"title":"死对谁有好处?","authors":"Jennifer Tran, Jillian A. Tullis","doi":"10.1525/dcqr.2021.10.3.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay introduces the Critical Intervention forum focused on the question “Who is a good death for?” The eight contributions in this Critical Intervention forum use art, prose, performance, and critical analysis to explore this guiding question. Dying well should be for everyone, but as the contributors observe, accomplishing a good death is complicated by context, geography, relationships, politics, and ideology.","PeriodicalId":36478,"journal":{"name":"Departures in Critical Qualitative Research","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Who Is a Good Death for?\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer Tran, Jillian A. Tullis\",\"doi\":\"10.1525/dcqr.2021.10.3.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay introduces the Critical Intervention forum focused on the question “Who is a good death for?” The eight contributions in this Critical Intervention forum use art, prose, performance, and critical analysis to explore this guiding question. Dying well should be for everyone, but as the contributors observe, accomplishing a good death is complicated by context, geography, relationships, politics, and ideology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36478,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Departures in Critical Qualitative Research\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Departures in Critical Qualitative Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1525/dcqr.2021.10.3.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Departures in Critical Qualitative Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/dcqr.2021.10.3.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章介绍了关键干预论坛,关注的问题是“谁是一个好的死亡?”本次批判性干预论坛的八篇文章使用艺术、散文、表演和批判性分析来探索这个指导性问题。死得好应该是每个人的事,但正如作者所观察到的那样,死得好会因环境、地理、人际关系、政治和意识形态而变得复杂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Who Is a Good Death for?
This essay introduces the Critical Intervention forum focused on the question “Who is a good death for?” The eight contributions in this Critical Intervention forum use art, prose, performance, and critical analysis to explore this guiding question. Dying well should be for everyone, but as the contributors observe, accomplishing a good death is complicated by context, geography, relationships, politics, and ideology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Departures in Critical Qualitative Research
Departures in Critical Qualitative Research Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Liminal Zones of Knowing, Learning, and Being Treating Voices Carefully Unraveling Interior and Exterior Circumstances Faking It, Finishing, and Ambivalence Visualizing Hope Through Black Children’s Multimodal Messages Reflecting the Multiple Pandemics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1