{"title":"上帝、科技和基督徒的生活","authors":"Tony Reinke","doi":"10.56315/pscf3-23reinke","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"GOD, TECHNOLOGY, AND THE CHRISTIAN LIFE by Tony Reinke. Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2022. 320 pages. Paperback; $21.99. ISBN: 9781433578274. *The ASA has long opposed the myth that science and Christian faith are incompatible. Nevertheless, ASA members differ on all sorts of issues. With little consensus on biblical eschatology, the greatest differences may be on issues related to the future. If so, then Tony Reinke's God, Technology, and the Christian Life is sure to be thought provoking, for its focus is the ongoing explosion in scientific knowledge and its applications. *Reinke, a journalist and author of several books, is associated with John Piper and his Desiring God ministry. He adheres to Piper's Reformed theology and trademark \"Christian hedonism,\" which holds that our chief end is to \"glorify God by enjoying him forever.\" So Reinke is not only a Christian hedonist, but also a tech hedonist. Today's gadgets delight him, and he looks forward to more wonders in the future. Even so, Reinke's hopes are well placed; he is \"optimistic--not optimistic in man, but in the God who governs every square inch of Silicon Valley\" (p. 30), a statement that summarizes the entire book. *A concluding section explains the book's origins (pp. 303-4). To write an introduction for 12 Ways Your Phone Is Changing You, published in 2017, Reinke found it necessary to \"catalog\" his \"meta convictions about human innovation.\" He went on to develop his convictions, revise and extend his catalog, do more research, and present his findings to several audiences, both in person and online. Finally, he assembled his lectures to produce this text. Unfortunately, it seems that this process left serious style problems. Individual chapters have a stand-alone quality, to the point they seem disconnected from the rest. Chapter-end summaries belabor the book's main points. Overall, the book's repetitive style obscures its connecting logic. *So what does the book argue? *In the Reformed tradition, Reinke seeks to develop a \"biblical theology of technology\" (p. 30). He begins with God's sovereignty in creation, and continues with God raising up image-bearers to explore nature and invent tools. Finally, Reinke argues that God stands over those that \"wield\" technology, for both good or evil; even their worst acts (e.g., the crucifixion of Christ) are \"hacked\" by God to achieve our redemption, which was planned \"before the foundation of the world.\" Technology is a feature of history, but it does not drive it. Instead, history always unfolds in accordance with the divine will. *The book is organized around nine people, nine primary Bible passages, and twelve common myths about technology (pp. 25-29). Some subjects are predictable (e.g., Babel), but others are not, giving some depth to Reinke's analysis. Six chapters broadly address key questions: \"What Is Technology?,\" \"What Is God's Relationship to Technology?,\" \"Where Do Our Technologies Come From?,\" \"What Can Technology Never Accomplish?,\" \"When Do Our Technologies End?,\" and \"How Should We Use Technology Today?\" In Reinke's repetitive style, chapters conclude with numbered lists of \"Takeaways\" that summarize, and sometimes extend, main points. *So, does Reinke succeed? Is his \"biblical theology of technology\" sound? Depending on their theological presuppositions, readers will judge differently. *Reformed readers, like me, will appreciate Reinke's emphasis on God's sovereignty. In this view, nature testifies to God's existence and wonderful character, and so does technology, its wonders rooted in the divine attributes, and produced by image bearers that reflect them. Tech demonstrates God's creation of both nature and human innovators, and it plays important roles in the plan of redemption, all to the glory of God. *Readers from other traditions will differ to the extent they look to human agency to shape history and the future. Surely, mature Christians understand salvation is based in God's grace, but then what? Christians should live out their faith, but to what extent do their choices matter? Ultimately, are God's promises fulfilled by him alone, or are they realized somehow through human action, including work in science and technology? In Alfred North Whitehead's process theology or Philip Hefner's created co-creator ideas, humanity achieves, to some degree, what God has promised in the eschaton. Indeed, such thinking is common among self-identified Christian transhumanists. *In Reinke's Reformed view, such hopes distract from life's purpose, our chief end: the glorification of God. Instead, dreams of human self-sufficiency tend toward idolatry. God, jealous for his own glory, has placed that goal beyond our reach, and in our rebellion against God, its relentless pursuit only displays our depravity. *Yes, but even this view calls for boundaries. Where does our misguided quest for self-sufficiency end, and where do warranted good works begin? Does not scripture authorize the development and use of technology to reduce suffering and to love our neighbors? To what extent can we delight in inventions without making them idols? *Unfortunately, Reinke does not answer these questions; quite the opposite. He criticizes Christians wrestling with such issues for using descriptive labels (e.g., scientism) because, in his view, they limit \"thoughtful conversations on technology\" (p. 29), yet he is unequivocal in opposing proclamation of a \"Gospel of Technology\" (pp. 163-73). But again, how should Christians find our limits under God's rule? This question seems less important to Reinke than simply believing God will make the most of whatever happens. *Yes, the final chapter highlights the necessity of wisdom in using technology, wisdom that is available from God alone. But does not God give insight to all people? May we reasonably view science and technology as evidence of common grace, but deny that common grace could affect how society organizes and operates? Reinke praises the Amish for making deliberate decisions regarding technology, suggesting that all Christians would do well to do the same, but what criteria should we choose? *Ultimately, Reinke leaves all the big questions to God. Confident in him, Christians should just do the best they can, and then be content with the results. They are, after all, ordained by God. Surely this is true to some extent, but this leaves Reinke's \"biblical theology of technology\" open to the classic criticism of Reformed thought: under its banner, Christians are not fully responsible for the results of their actions. *On this point, deep differences appear between Reinke and other Christian observers of technology development. For example, in A Christian Field Guide to Technology for Engineers and Designers, Ethan J. Brue, Derek C. Schuurman, and Steven H. VanderLeest argue that, compared with others, Christian innovators bear a greater responsibility than others. Informed by biblical ethics and wisdom, they must go beyond minimal success measures. Engineering leadership means faithful conformance to rules, and then some; supererogation is the requirement. But in the end, the message is the same: follow the rules--expressed in either policy or scripture--and the results will surely be good. Well, history reveals limits to that idea. And again, judgement is required. We must not only recognize that moral choices shape technology and its use, but also avoid an empty and uninformed tech moralism. *We might want clear lines separating good from evil in technology, but neither Reinke nor other Christian authors can supply them. But to be fair, to what extent do people note and observe the clear lines God gave us in the Ten Commandments, the Sermon on the Mount, and many other passages? Until we leave this troubled world, clearly, we must walk by faith, not sight. So, as we walk through our technoscience-saturated world, Reinke and other Christians with biblical views of technology serve the church well. Surely, many ASA members, from diverse theological traditions, will find God, Technology, and the Christian Life interesting--either stimulating or frustrating--as well as contributing to further explorations of technology in the light of scripture. *Reviewed by David C. Winyard Sr., Department of Engineering, Grace College & Seminary, Winona Lake, IN 46590.","PeriodicalId":53927,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"God, Technology, and the Christian Life\",\"authors\":\"Tony Reinke\",\"doi\":\"10.56315/pscf3-23reinke\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"GOD, TECHNOLOGY, AND THE CHRISTIAN LIFE by Tony Reinke. Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2022. 320 pages. Paperback; $21.99. ISBN: 9781433578274. *The ASA has long opposed the myth that science and Christian faith are incompatible. Nevertheless, ASA members differ on all sorts of issues. With little consensus on biblical eschatology, the greatest differences may be on issues related to the future. If so, then Tony Reinke's God, Technology, and the Christian Life is sure to be thought provoking, for its focus is the ongoing explosion in scientific knowledge and its applications. *Reinke, a journalist and author of several books, is associated with John Piper and his Desiring God ministry. He adheres to Piper's Reformed theology and trademark \\\"Christian hedonism,\\\" which holds that our chief end is to \\\"glorify God by enjoying him forever.\\\" So Reinke is not only a Christian hedonist, but also a tech hedonist. Today's gadgets delight him, and he looks forward to more wonders in the future. Even so, Reinke's hopes are well placed; he is \\\"optimistic--not optimistic in man, but in the God who governs every square inch of Silicon Valley\\\" (p. 30), a statement that summarizes the entire book. *A concluding section explains the book's origins (pp. 303-4). To write an introduction for 12 Ways Your Phone Is Changing You, published in 2017, Reinke found it necessary to \\\"catalog\\\" his \\\"meta convictions about human innovation.\\\" He went on to develop his convictions, revise and extend his catalog, do more research, and present his findings to several audiences, both in person and online. Finally, he assembled his lectures to produce this text. Unfortunately, it seems that this process left serious style problems. Individual chapters have a stand-alone quality, to the point they seem disconnected from the rest. Chapter-end summaries belabor the book's main points. Overall, the book's repetitive style obscures its connecting logic. *So what does the book argue? *In the Reformed tradition, Reinke seeks to develop a \\\"biblical theology of technology\\\" (p. 30). He begins with God's sovereignty in creation, and continues with God raising up image-bearers to explore nature and invent tools. Finally, Reinke argues that God stands over those that \\\"wield\\\" technology, for both good or evil; even their worst acts (e.g., the crucifixion of Christ) are \\\"hacked\\\" by God to achieve our redemption, which was planned \\\"before the foundation of the world.\\\" Technology is a feature of history, but it does not drive it. Instead, history always unfolds in accordance with the divine will. *The book is organized around nine people, nine primary Bible passages, and twelve common myths about technology (pp. 25-29). Some subjects are predictable (e.g., Babel), but others are not, giving some depth to Reinke's analysis. Six chapters broadly address key questions: \\\"What Is Technology?,\\\" \\\"What Is God's Relationship to Technology?,\\\" \\\"Where Do Our Technologies Come From?,\\\" \\\"What Can Technology Never Accomplish?,\\\" \\\"When Do Our Technologies End?,\\\" and \\\"How Should We Use Technology Today?\\\" In Reinke's repetitive style, chapters conclude with numbered lists of \\\"Takeaways\\\" that summarize, and sometimes extend, main points. *So, does Reinke succeed? Is his \\\"biblical theology of technology\\\" sound? Depending on their theological presuppositions, readers will judge differently. *Reformed readers, like me, will appreciate Reinke's emphasis on God's sovereignty. In this view, nature testifies to God's existence and wonderful character, and so does technology, its wonders rooted in the divine attributes, and produced by image bearers that reflect them. Tech demonstrates God's creation of both nature and human innovators, and it plays important roles in the plan of redemption, all to the glory of God. *Readers from other traditions will differ to the extent they look to human agency to shape history and the future. Surely, mature Christians understand salvation is based in God's grace, but then what? Christians should live out their faith, but to what extent do their choices matter? Ultimately, are God's promises fulfilled by him alone, or are they realized somehow through human action, including work in science and technology? In Alfred North Whitehead's process theology or Philip Hefner's created co-creator ideas, humanity achieves, to some degree, what God has promised in the eschaton. Indeed, such thinking is common among self-identified Christian transhumanists. *In Reinke's Reformed view, such hopes distract from life's purpose, our chief end: the glorification of God. Instead, dreams of human self-sufficiency tend toward idolatry. God, jealous for his own glory, has placed that goal beyond our reach, and in our rebellion against God, its relentless pursuit only displays our depravity. *Yes, but even this view calls for boundaries. Where does our misguided quest for self-sufficiency end, and where do warranted good works begin? Does not scripture authorize the development and use of technology to reduce suffering and to love our neighbors? To what extent can we delight in inventions without making them idols? *Unfortunately, Reinke does not answer these questions; quite the opposite. He criticizes Christians wrestling with such issues for using descriptive labels (e.g., scientism) because, in his view, they limit \\\"thoughtful conversations on technology\\\" (p. 29), yet he is unequivocal in opposing proclamation of a \\\"Gospel of Technology\\\" (pp. 163-73). But again, how should Christians find our limits under God's rule? This question seems less important to Reinke than simply believing God will make the most of whatever happens. *Yes, the final chapter highlights the necessity of wisdom in using technology, wisdom that is available from God alone. But does not God give insight to all people? May we reasonably view science and technology as evidence of common grace, but deny that common grace could affect how society organizes and operates? Reinke praises the Amish for making deliberate decisions regarding technology, suggesting that all Christians would do well to do the same, but what criteria should we choose? *Ultimately, Reinke leaves all the big questions to God. Confident in him, Christians should just do the best they can, and then be content with the results. They are, after all, ordained by God. Surely this is true to some extent, but this leaves Reinke's \\\"biblical theology of technology\\\" open to the classic criticism of Reformed thought: under its banner, Christians are not fully responsible for the results of their actions. *On this point, deep differences appear between Reinke and other Christian observers of technology development. For example, in A Christian Field Guide to Technology for Engineers and Designers, Ethan J. Brue, Derek C. Schuurman, and Steven H. VanderLeest argue that, compared with others, Christian innovators bear a greater responsibility than others. Informed by biblical ethics and wisdom, they must go beyond minimal success measures. Engineering leadership means faithful conformance to rules, and then some; supererogation is the requirement. But in the end, the message is the same: follow the rules--expressed in either policy or scripture--and the results will surely be good. Well, history reveals limits to that idea. And again, judgement is required. We must not only recognize that moral choices shape technology and its use, but also avoid an empty and uninformed tech moralism. *We might want clear lines separating good from evil in technology, but neither Reinke nor other Christian authors can supply them. But to be fair, to what extent do people note and observe the clear lines God gave us in the Ten Commandments, the Sermon on the Mount, and many other passages? Until we leave this troubled world, clearly, we must walk by faith, not sight. So, as we walk through our technoscience-saturated world, Reinke and other Christians with biblical views of technology serve the church well. Surely, many ASA members, from diverse theological traditions, will find God, Technology, and the Christian Life interesting--either stimulating or frustrating--as well as contributing to further explorations of technology in the light of scripture. *Reviewed by David C. Winyard Sr., Department of Engineering, Grace College & Seminary, Winona Lake, IN 46590.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53927,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56315/pscf3-23reinke\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56315/pscf3-23reinke","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
《上帝、科技与基督徒生活》作者:托尼·赖因克。惠顿,伊利诺伊州:十字路口,2022年。320页。平装书;21.99美元。ISBN: 9781433578274。*美国科学协会长期以来一直反对科学和基督教信仰不相容的神话。然而,ASA成员在各种问题上都存在分歧。在圣经末世论上几乎没有共识,最大的分歧可能是在与未来有关的问题上。如果是这样的话,那么托尼·赖因克的《上帝、技术和基督徒生活》肯定会发人深省,因为它的重点是科学知识及其应用的持续爆炸。*赖因克是一名记者和几本书的作者,与约翰·派珀和他的渴望上帝的事工有关。他坚持派博的改革宗神学和标志性的“基督教享乐主义”,认为我们的主要目的是“通过永远享受上帝来荣耀他”。所以赖因克不仅是一个基督徒享乐主义者,也是一个科技享乐主义者。今天的小玩意让他很开心,他期待着未来会有更多的奇迹。即便如此,赖因克还是满怀希望;他是“乐观的——不是对人乐观,而是对掌管硅谷每一寸土地的上帝乐观”(第30页),这句话概括了整本书。*结束语部分解释了本书的起源(第303-4页)。在为2017年出版的《手机改变你的12种方式》撰写引言时,赖因克发现有必要对他“关于人类创新的元信念”进行“编录”。他继续发展自己的信念,修改和扩展他的目录,做更多的研究,并向几个观众展示他的发现,包括面对面的和在线的。最后,他整理了他的讲稿,形成了这本书。不幸的是,这个过程似乎留下了严重的风格问题。单个章节具有独立的品质,以至于它们似乎与其他章节脱节。章末总结详述了本书的主要观点。总的来说,这本书的重复风格掩盖了它的联系逻辑。*这本书是怎么说的?*在改革宗传统中,赖因克寻求发展一种“符合圣经的技术神学”(第30页)。他从神在创造中的主权开始,接着讲到神兴起有形像的人去探索自然和发明工具。最后,Reinke认为上帝凌驾于那些“运用”技术的人之上,无论他们是善是恶;甚至他们最坏的行为(例如,基督被钉在十字架上)都被神“砍了”,以实现我们的救赎,这是“创世以前”计划好的。技术是历史的一个特征,但它并不驱动历史。相反,历史总是按照神圣的意志展开。*这本书围绕9个人,9个主要的圣经段落和12个关于技术的常见神话(第25-29页)进行组织。有些主题是可预测的(例如,巴别塔),但其他的不是,这给了Reinke的分析一些深度。六个章节广泛地讨论了关键问题:“什么是技术?”,“上帝与技术的关系是什么?”,“我们的技术从何而来?”、“什么是科技永远无法完成的?”、《我们的科技何时终结?》,以及“我们今天应该如何使用技术?”在Reinke的重复风格中,章节以编号的“要点”列表结束,这些要点总结了主要观点,有时也延伸了要点。那么,Reinke成功了吗?他的“圣经技术神学”听起来合理吗?根据他们的神学预设,读者会有不同的判断。*像我这样的改革宗读者会欣赏赖因克对上帝主权的强调。在这种观点中,自然证明了上帝的存在和奇妙的特性,技术也是如此,它的奇迹植根于神圣的属性,并由反映这些属性的图像承载者产生。科技展示了上帝对自然和人类创新者的创造,它在救赎计划中扮演着重要的角色,一切都是为了上帝的荣耀。*来自其他传统的读者在一定程度上依赖人类的力量来塑造历史和未来。当然,成熟的基督徒明白救恩是基于神的恩典,但那又怎样呢?基督徒应该活出他们的信仰,但他们的选择在多大程度上重要呢?最终,上帝的应许是由他自己实现的,还是通过人类的行动,包括科学和技术的工作来实现的?在阿尔弗雷德·诺斯·怀特黑德的过程神学或菲利普·赫夫纳的创造共同创造者思想中,人类在某种程度上实现了上帝在末世的承诺。事实上,这种想法在自认为是基督徒的超人类主义者中很常见。*在赖因克的改革宗观点中,这样的希望偏离了人生的目的,我们的主要目的:荣耀上帝。相反,人类自给自足的梦想倾向于盲目崇拜。神嫉妒他自己的荣耀,把这个目标放在我们无法企及的地方,在我们对神的悖逆中,无情的追求只会显示我们的败坏。是的,但即使是这种观点也需要界限。 我们对自给自足的误入歧途的追求在哪里结束?值得信赖的善行从哪里开始?难道圣经不授权发展和使用技术来减少痛苦和爱我们的邻居吗?我们能在多大程度上享受发明而不把它们变成偶像?不幸的是,Reinke并没有回答这些问题;恰恰相反。他批评纠结于这些问题的基督徒使用描述性的标签(例如,科学主义),因为在他看来,这些标签限制了“关于技术的深思熟虑的对话”(第29页),然而他毫不含糊地反对宣布“技术福音”(第163-73页)。但是,基督徒应该如何在神的统治下找到我们的界限呢?对赖因克来说,这个问题似乎不那么重要,重要的是相信上帝会充分利用所发生的一切。*是的,最后一章强调了使用技术时智慧的必要性,这种智慧只能从上帝那里获得。神不是叫众人都有聪明吗?我们是否可以合理地将科学和技术视为共同恩典的证据,但否认共同恩典可以影响社会的组织和运作方式?Reinke赞扬了阿米什人在技术方面深思熟虑的决定,暗示所有基督徒都应该做得很好,但我们应该选择什么标准呢?*最终,赖因克把所有的大问题都留给了上帝。基督徒对神充满信心,应该尽自己所能,然后对结果感到满足。毕竟,他们是上帝命定的。当然,这在某种程度上是正确的,但这让赖因克的“圣经技术神学”暴露在对改革宗思想的经典批评之下:在它的旗帜下,基督徒并不完全为他们行为的结果负责。*在这一点上,Reinke和其他基督教技术发展观察家之间出现了深刻的分歧。例如,在《工程师和设计师的基督教技术现场指南》中,Ethan J. Brue, Derek C. Schuurman和Steven H. VanderLeest认为,与其他人相比,基督教创新者承担着比其他人更大的责任。根据圣经的伦理和智慧,他们必须超越最小的成功措施。工程领导意味着忠实地遵守规则,等等;重叠是必要条件。但最终,传达的信息是一样的:遵循政策或经文中表达的规则,结果肯定会很好。历史揭示了这种想法的局限性。再一次,判断是必要的。我们不仅要认识到道德选择塑造了技术及其使用,还要避免空洞和无知的技术道德主义。*我们可能想要在技术上明确区分善与恶,但无论是赖因克还是其他基督教作家都无法提供这样的界限。但公平地说,人们在多大程度上注意到并遵守了神在十诫、登山宝训和许多其他经文中给我们的清晰线条?很明显,在我们离开这个混乱的世界之前,我们必须凭信心行事,而不是凭眼见。因此,当我们走过这个充斥着技术科学的世界时,赖因克和其他持圣经观点的基督徒很好地服务于教会。当然,许多来自不同神学传统的ASA成员会发现上帝、技术和基督徒生活很有趣——要么令人兴奋,要么令人沮丧——同时也有助于在圣经的光照下进一步探索技术。*由David C. Winyard Sr.审核,Grace College & Seminary, Winona Lake, IN 46590工程系。
GOD, TECHNOLOGY, AND THE CHRISTIAN LIFE by Tony Reinke. Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2022. 320 pages. Paperback; $21.99. ISBN: 9781433578274. *The ASA has long opposed the myth that science and Christian faith are incompatible. Nevertheless, ASA members differ on all sorts of issues. With little consensus on biblical eschatology, the greatest differences may be on issues related to the future. If so, then Tony Reinke's God, Technology, and the Christian Life is sure to be thought provoking, for its focus is the ongoing explosion in scientific knowledge and its applications. *Reinke, a journalist and author of several books, is associated with John Piper and his Desiring God ministry. He adheres to Piper's Reformed theology and trademark "Christian hedonism," which holds that our chief end is to "glorify God by enjoying him forever." So Reinke is not only a Christian hedonist, but also a tech hedonist. Today's gadgets delight him, and he looks forward to more wonders in the future. Even so, Reinke's hopes are well placed; he is "optimistic--not optimistic in man, but in the God who governs every square inch of Silicon Valley" (p. 30), a statement that summarizes the entire book. *A concluding section explains the book's origins (pp. 303-4). To write an introduction for 12 Ways Your Phone Is Changing You, published in 2017, Reinke found it necessary to "catalog" his "meta convictions about human innovation." He went on to develop his convictions, revise and extend his catalog, do more research, and present his findings to several audiences, both in person and online. Finally, he assembled his lectures to produce this text. Unfortunately, it seems that this process left serious style problems. Individual chapters have a stand-alone quality, to the point they seem disconnected from the rest. Chapter-end summaries belabor the book's main points. Overall, the book's repetitive style obscures its connecting logic. *So what does the book argue? *In the Reformed tradition, Reinke seeks to develop a "biblical theology of technology" (p. 30). He begins with God's sovereignty in creation, and continues with God raising up image-bearers to explore nature and invent tools. Finally, Reinke argues that God stands over those that "wield" technology, for both good or evil; even their worst acts (e.g., the crucifixion of Christ) are "hacked" by God to achieve our redemption, which was planned "before the foundation of the world." Technology is a feature of history, but it does not drive it. Instead, history always unfolds in accordance with the divine will. *The book is organized around nine people, nine primary Bible passages, and twelve common myths about technology (pp. 25-29). Some subjects are predictable (e.g., Babel), but others are not, giving some depth to Reinke's analysis. Six chapters broadly address key questions: "What Is Technology?," "What Is God's Relationship to Technology?," "Where Do Our Technologies Come From?," "What Can Technology Never Accomplish?," "When Do Our Technologies End?," and "How Should We Use Technology Today?" In Reinke's repetitive style, chapters conclude with numbered lists of "Takeaways" that summarize, and sometimes extend, main points. *So, does Reinke succeed? Is his "biblical theology of technology" sound? Depending on their theological presuppositions, readers will judge differently. *Reformed readers, like me, will appreciate Reinke's emphasis on God's sovereignty. In this view, nature testifies to God's existence and wonderful character, and so does technology, its wonders rooted in the divine attributes, and produced by image bearers that reflect them. Tech demonstrates God's creation of both nature and human innovators, and it plays important roles in the plan of redemption, all to the glory of God. *Readers from other traditions will differ to the extent they look to human agency to shape history and the future. Surely, mature Christians understand salvation is based in God's grace, but then what? Christians should live out their faith, but to what extent do their choices matter? Ultimately, are God's promises fulfilled by him alone, or are they realized somehow through human action, including work in science and technology? In Alfred North Whitehead's process theology or Philip Hefner's created co-creator ideas, humanity achieves, to some degree, what God has promised in the eschaton. Indeed, such thinking is common among self-identified Christian transhumanists. *In Reinke's Reformed view, such hopes distract from life's purpose, our chief end: the glorification of God. Instead, dreams of human self-sufficiency tend toward idolatry. God, jealous for his own glory, has placed that goal beyond our reach, and in our rebellion against God, its relentless pursuit only displays our depravity. *Yes, but even this view calls for boundaries. Where does our misguided quest for self-sufficiency end, and where do warranted good works begin? Does not scripture authorize the development and use of technology to reduce suffering and to love our neighbors? To what extent can we delight in inventions without making them idols? *Unfortunately, Reinke does not answer these questions; quite the opposite. He criticizes Christians wrestling with such issues for using descriptive labels (e.g., scientism) because, in his view, they limit "thoughtful conversations on technology" (p. 29), yet he is unequivocal in opposing proclamation of a "Gospel of Technology" (pp. 163-73). But again, how should Christians find our limits under God's rule? This question seems less important to Reinke than simply believing God will make the most of whatever happens. *Yes, the final chapter highlights the necessity of wisdom in using technology, wisdom that is available from God alone. But does not God give insight to all people? May we reasonably view science and technology as evidence of common grace, but deny that common grace could affect how society organizes and operates? Reinke praises the Amish for making deliberate decisions regarding technology, suggesting that all Christians would do well to do the same, but what criteria should we choose? *Ultimately, Reinke leaves all the big questions to God. Confident in him, Christians should just do the best they can, and then be content with the results. They are, after all, ordained by God. Surely this is true to some extent, but this leaves Reinke's "biblical theology of technology" open to the classic criticism of Reformed thought: under its banner, Christians are not fully responsible for the results of their actions. *On this point, deep differences appear between Reinke and other Christian observers of technology development. For example, in A Christian Field Guide to Technology for Engineers and Designers, Ethan J. Brue, Derek C. Schuurman, and Steven H. VanderLeest argue that, compared with others, Christian innovators bear a greater responsibility than others. Informed by biblical ethics and wisdom, they must go beyond minimal success measures. Engineering leadership means faithful conformance to rules, and then some; supererogation is the requirement. But in the end, the message is the same: follow the rules--expressed in either policy or scripture--and the results will surely be good. Well, history reveals limits to that idea. And again, judgement is required. We must not only recognize that moral choices shape technology and its use, but also avoid an empty and uninformed tech moralism. *We might want clear lines separating good from evil in technology, but neither Reinke nor other Christian authors can supply them. But to be fair, to what extent do people note and observe the clear lines God gave us in the Ten Commandments, the Sermon on the Mount, and many other passages? Until we leave this troubled world, clearly, we must walk by faith, not sight. So, as we walk through our technoscience-saturated world, Reinke and other Christians with biblical views of technology serve the church well. Surely, many ASA members, from diverse theological traditions, will find God, Technology, and the Christian Life interesting--either stimulating or frustrating--as well as contributing to further explorations of technology in the light of scripture. *Reviewed by David C. Winyard Sr., Department of Engineering, Grace College & Seminary, Winona Lake, IN 46590.