{"title":"高概率命令序列的演化:理论和程序问题","authors":"H. King, D. Houlihan, Keith C. Radley, Duc Lai","doi":"10.1080/15021149.2020.1758989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Behavior analysts have studied John A. Nevin’s behavior momentum theory (BMT) since its introduction over three decades ago. The work of applied and translational researchers led to the development of the high-probability command sequence (HPCS). However, as BMT has been extrapolated to applied settings from experimental laboratories, a trend among applied behavior analysts has been to intermingle the terms, BMT and HPCS. Researchers must address this problematic trend because theoretical frameworks established in an experimental setting are conceptual while behavior modification technologies are procedural. This review aims to discuss several important distinctions between BMT and HPCS in an effort to encourage the exploration of behavioral momentum in areas other than noncompliance and education.","PeriodicalId":37052,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Behavior Analysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The evolution of high probability command sequences: Theoretical and procedural concerns\",\"authors\":\"H. King, D. Houlihan, Keith C. Radley, Duc Lai\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15021149.2020.1758989\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Behavior analysts have studied John A. Nevin’s behavior momentum theory (BMT) since its introduction over three decades ago. The work of applied and translational researchers led to the development of the high-probability command sequence (HPCS). However, as BMT has been extrapolated to applied settings from experimental laboratories, a trend among applied behavior analysts has been to intermingle the terms, BMT and HPCS. Researchers must address this problematic trend because theoretical frameworks established in an experimental setting are conceptual while behavior modification technologies are procedural. This review aims to discuss several important distinctions between BMT and HPCS in an effort to encourage the exploration of behavioral momentum in areas other than noncompliance and education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Behavior Analysis\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Behavior Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2020.1758989\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Behavior Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2020.1758989","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
自John A. Nevin的行为动量理论(Behavior momentum theory, BMT)在三十多年前提出以来,行为分析家一直在研究它。应用和转化研究人员的工作导致了高概率命令序列(HPCS)的发展。然而,由于BMT已经从实验实验室外推到应用环境中,应用行为分析师的趋势是将BMT和HPCS这两个术语混合在一起。研究人员必须解决这一问题趋势,因为在实验环境中建立的理论框架是概念性的,而行为改变技术是程序性的。本文旨在讨论BMT和HPCS之间的几个重要区别,以鼓励在不遵守和教育以外的领域探索行为动力。
The evolution of high probability command sequences: Theoretical and procedural concerns
ABSTRACT Behavior analysts have studied John A. Nevin’s behavior momentum theory (BMT) since its introduction over three decades ago. The work of applied and translational researchers led to the development of the high-probability command sequence (HPCS). However, as BMT has been extrapolated to applied settings from experimental laboratories, a trend among applied behavior analysts has been to intermingle the terms, BMT and HPCS. Researchers must address this problematic trend because theoretical frameworks established in an experimental setting are conceptual while behavior modification technologies are procedural. This review aims to discuss several important distinctions between BMT and HPCS in an effort to encourage the exploration of behavioral momentum in areas other than noncompliance and education.