青少年健康关系教育方案:对结果的系统审查

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pastoral Care in Education Pub Date : 2022-03-23 DOI:10.1080/02643944.2022.2054024
S. Benham-Clarke, Georgina Roberts, A. Janssens, T. Newlove-Delgado
{"title":"青少年健康关系教育方案:对结果的系统审查","authors":"S. Benham-Clarke, Georgina Roberts, A. Janssens, T. Newlove-Delgado","doi":"10.1080/02643944.2022.2054024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The quality of romantic relationships is associated with mental health and wellbeing throughout the life course. A number of programmes have been developed to support young people in navigating healthy relationships, and a larger role for relationship education was recently formalised in statutory guidance in England. This study aimed to systematically review the evidence base for relationship education programmes. Evaluations of relationship education programmes for young people, including charting of outcome domains and measures, were reviewed, followed by a focussed synthesis of data from studies that included outcome domains of relevance to healthy relationships. Thirty-six studies of seven programmes were found that focussed on one or more outcomes relating to healthy relationship skills, knowledge and attitudes, none of which were assessed as high quality. All evaluated programmes were developed in the US, and only one evaluation was conducted in the UK. The evaluations had a diverse set of outcome domains and outcome measures, few had longitudinal measures. No evidence was found for young people’s involvement in programme or evaluation development. High-quality longitudinal evaluations and a core set of validated outcome measures are needed. This research also highlights the need to co-create programmes with young people, teachers and relationship experts that are feasible, acceptable and integrated into a mental health-informed curriculum","PeriodicalId":45422,"journal":{"name":"Pastoral Care in Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Healthy relationship education programmes for young people: systematic review of outcomes\",\"authors\":\"S. Benham-Clarke, Georgina Roberts, A. Janssens, T. Newlove-Delgado\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02643944.2022.2054024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The quality of romantic relationships is associated with mental health and wellbeing throughout the life course. A number of programmes have been developed to support young people in navigating healthy relationships, and a larger role for relationship education was recently formalised in statutory guidance in England. This study aimed to systematically review the evidence base for relationship education programmes. Evaluations of relationship education programmes for young people, including charting of outcome domains and measures, were reviewed, followed by a focussed synthesis of data from studies that included outcome domains of relevance to healthy relationships. Thirty-six studies of seven programmes were found that focussed on one or more outcomes relating to healthy relationship skills, knowledge and attitudes, none of which were assessed as high quality. All evaluated programmes were developed in the US, and only one evaluation was conducted in the UK. The evaluations had a diverse set of outcome domains and outcome measures, few had longitudinal measures. No evidence was found for young people’s involvement in programme or evaluation development. High-quality longitudinal evaluations and a core set of validated outcome measures are needed. This research also highlights the need to co-create programmes with young people, teachers and relationship experts that are feasible, acceptable and integrated into a mental health-informed curriculum\",\"PeriodicalId\":45422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pastoral Care in Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pastoral Care in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02643944.2022.2054024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pastoral Care in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02643944.2022.2054024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

浪漫关系的质量与整个生命过程中的心理健康和幸福有关。已经制定了一些方案,以支持年轻人处理健康的关系,最近在英格兰的法定指导中正式确定了关系教育的更大作用。本研究旨在系统回顾关系教育计划的证据基础。审查了对青年关系教育方案的评价,包括结果领域和措施的图表,然后重点综合了包括与健康关系相关的结果领域的研究的数据。发现7个方案的36项研究侧重于与健康的关系技能、知识和态度有关的一项或多项结果,但没有一项被评估为高质量。所有接受评估的项目都是在美国开发的,只有一项评估是在英国进行的。评估有不同的结果域和结果测量,很少有纵向测量。没有证据表明年轻人参与了项目或评价的发展。需要高质量的纵向评估和一套核心的经过验证的结果测量。这项研究还强调需要与年轻人、教师和关系专家共同制定可行、可接受并纳入心理健康知识课程的方案
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Healthy relationship education programmes for young people: systematic review of outcomes
ABSTRACT The quality of romantic relationships is associated with mental health and wellbeing throughout the life course. A number of programmes have been developed to support young people in navigating healthy relationships, and a larger role for relationship education was recently formalised in statutory guidance in England. This study aimed to systematically review the evidence base for relationship education programmes. Evaluations of relationship education programmes for young people, including charting of outcome domains and measures, were reviewed, followed by a focussed synthesis of data from studies that included outcome domains of relevance to healthy relationships. Thirty-six studies of seven programmes were found that focussed on one or more outcomes relating to healthy relationship skills, knowledge and attitudes, none of which were assessed as high quality. All evaluated programmes were developed in the US, and only one evaluation was conducted in the UK. The evaluations had a diverse set of outcome domains and outcome measures, few had longitudinal measures. No evidence was found for young people’s involvement in programme or evaluation development. High-quality longitudinal evaluations and a core set of validated outcome measures are needed. This research also highlights the need to co-create programmes with young people, teachers and relationship experts that are feasible, acceptable and integrated into a mental health-informed curriculum
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pastoral Care in Education
Pastoral Care in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
31
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of a novel primary to secondary school transition personal and social education programme Exploring the relationship between the Emotional Literacy Support Assistant (ELSA) intervention and whole-school approaches to wellbeing – a case study High schoolers and dating issues: examining the effectiveness of an app-based mindfulness intervention “If we don’t adapt, we lose some parents”. Collaborations with migrant families in the context of student wellbeing Young people as co-researchers in schools: a collaborative research methodology which benefits young people and school culture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1