双寡头价格竞争与质量提升溢出效应

Xin Geng, Zepeng Chen, Xiaomeng Guo, Guang Xiao
{"title":"双寡头价格竞争与质量提升溢出效应","authors":"Xin Geng, Zepeng Chen, Xiaomeng Guo, Guang Xiao","doi":"10.1002/nav.22057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When competing firms embark and explore a new market, two salient features are often observed. On the one hand, the firms need to improve their quality by accumulating more experience and climbing up the learning curve. On the other hand, their quality may jointly expand the brand awareness of all competing products. In this article, we study a two‐period duopoly price competition where firms can improve their quality based on the accumulated demand (learn‐by‐doing effect) and their potential market size is positively affected by both firms' quality levels (quality spillover effect). In addition, we investigate two pricing schemes, namely, committed pricing and dynamic pricing, and their impact on the equilibrium outcomes. Assuming the two firms are symmetric in every aspect, our main findings include the following. First, we establish the existence and uniqueness of the pure Nash equilibrium for the dynamic game under either pricing scheme, and show that firms always set a low price in the first period to leverage quality improvement. As the quality spillover effect gets stronger, firms tend to raise their first‐period price, leading to a lower individual quality improvement and a non‐monotonic impact on firms' profit. Moreover, we find that committed pricing scheme benefits the duopoly when the spillover effect is strong, otherwise dynamic pricing scheme brings more profits. Finally, we examine two asymmetric cases where the firms are different in certain attributes pertaining to their learning speed and the quality spillover strength. Our analysis shows that the findings in the symmetric case still hold qualitatively. Useful managerial insights are derived from these studies.","PeriodicalId":19120,"journal":{"name":"Naval Research Logistics (NRL)","volume":"3 1","pages":"958 - 973"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Duopoly price competition with quality improvement spillover\",\"authors\":\"Xin Geng, Zepeng Chen, Xiaomeng Guo, Guang Xiao\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/nav.22057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When competing firms embark and explore a new market, two salient features are often observed. On the one hand, the firms need to improve their quality by accumulating more experience and climbing up the learning curve. On the other hand, their quality may jointly expand the brand awareness of all competing products. In this article, we study a two‐period duopoly price competition where firms can improve their quality based on the accumulated demand (learn‐by‐doing effect) and their potential market size is positively affected by both firms' quality levels (quality spillover effect). In addition, we investigate two pricing schemes, namely, committed pricing and dynamic pricing, and their impact on the equilibrium outcomes. Assuming the two firms are symmetric in every aspect, our main findings include the following. First, we establish the existence and uniqueness of the pure Nash equilibrium for the dynamic game under either pricing scheme, and show that firms always set a low price in the first period to leverage quality improvement. As the quality spillover effect gets stronger, firms tend to raise their first‐period price, leading to a lower individual quality improvement and a non‐monotonic impact on firms' profit. Moreover, we find that committed pricing scheme benefits the duopoly when the spillover effect is strong, otherwise dynamic pricing scheme brings more profits. Finally, we examine two asymmetric cases where the firms are different in certain attributes pertaining to their learning speed and the quality spillover strength. Our analysis shows that the findings in the symmetric case still hold qualitatively. Useful managerial insights are derived from these studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19120,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Naval Research Logistics (NRL)\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"958 - 973\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Naval Research Logistics (NRL)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.22057\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Naval Research Logistics (NRL)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.22057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

当相互竞争的公司进入并探索一个新市场时,通常会观察到两个显著特征。一方面,公司需要通过积累更多的经验和提高学习曲线来提高自己的质量。另一方面,它们的质量可以共同扩大所有竞争产品的品牌知名度。在本文中,我们研究了两期双寡头价格竞争,其中企业可以根据累积需求提高质量(边做边学效应),其潜在市场规模受到双方企业质量水平的积极影响(质量溢出效应)。此外,我们研究了两种定价方案,即承诺定价和动态定价,以及它们对均衡结果的影响。假设两家公司在各个方面都是对称的,我们的主要发现包括以下几点。首先,我们建立了两种定价方案下的动态博弈纯纳什均衡的存在唯一性,并证明了企业在第一阶段总是设定一个较低的价格来利用质量改进。随着质量溢出效应的增强,企业倾向于提高其第一期价格,从而导致个体质量改进的降低和对企业利润的非单调影响。此外,我们发现当溢出效应较强时,承诺定价方案对双寡头有利,否则,动态定价方案带来更多的利润。最后,我们考察了两种不对称案例,其中企业在与学习速度和质量溢出强度相关的某些属性上存在差异。我们的分析表明,在对称情况下的发现仍然定性地成立。这些研究得出了有用的管理见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Duopoly price competition with quality improvement spillover
When competing firms embark and explore a new market, two salient features are often observed. On the one hand, the firms need to improve their quality by accumulating more experience and climbing up the learning curve. On the other hand, their quality may jointly expand the brand awareness of all competing products. In this article, we study a two‐period duopoly price competition where firms can improve their quality based on the accumulated demand (learn‐by‐doing effect) and their potential market size is positively affected by both firms' quality levels (quality spillover effect). In addition, we investigate two pricing schemes, namely, committed pricing and dynamic pricing, and their impact on the equilibrium outcomes. Assuming the two firms are symmetric in every aspect, our main findings include the following. First, we establish the existence and uniqueness of the pure Nash equilibrium for the dynamic game under either pricing scheme, and show that firms always set a low price in the first period to leverage quality improvement. As the quality spillover effect gets stronger, firms tend to raise their first‐period price, leading to a lower individual quality improvement and a non‐monotonic impact on firms' profit. Moreover, we find that committed pricing scheme benefits the duopoly when the spillover effect is strong, otherwise dynamic pricing scheme brings more profits. Finally, we examine two asymmetric cases where the firms are different in certain attributes pertaining to their learning speed and the quality spillover strength. Our analysis shows that the findings in the symmetric case still hold qualitatively. Useful managerial insights are derived from these studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assigning parcel destinations to drop‐off points in a congested robotic sorting system An optimization‐based Monte Carlo method for estimating the two‐terminal survival signature of networks with two component classes A two‐stage adaptive robust model for designing a reliable blood supply chain network with disruption considerations in disaster situations Firm decisions and government subsidies in a supply chain with consumer surplus consideration Optimal emission regulation under market uncertainty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1