吉尔吉斯斯坦人的争论性探究分析

Q1 Social Sciences Russian Journal of Communication Pub Date : 2018-01-02 DOI:10.1080/19409419.2017.1399084
Talgat Subanaliev, S. Croucher, Elira Turdubayeva, S. Kelly
{"title":"吉尔吉斯斯坦人的争论性探究分析","authors":"Talgat Subanaliev, S. Croucher, Elira Turdubayeva, S. Kelly","doi":"10.1080/19409419.2017.1399084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT More than three decades of research on argumentativeness demonstrates that different cultures value differently this aspect of communication. Studies have evaluated levels of argumentativeness in numerous national cultures. This is the first study to explore levels of argumentativeness in Kyrgyzstan. Along with exploring the position of Kyrgyzstan on the argumentativeness continuum, this study also explores the validity and reliability of the Argumentativeness Scale in Kyrgyzstan. Results from 100 Kyrgyzstanis reveal that Kyrgyzstan scores relatively low on the argumentativeness continuum compared to argumentativeness scores from studies conducted in neighboring Asian countries. Furthermore, the sample produced a reliable and valid measure of argumentativeness in Kyrgyzstan.","PeriodicalId":53456,"journal":{"name":"Russian Journal of Communication","volume":"39 1","pages":"91 - 98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An exploratory analysis of argumentativeness in Kyrgyzstan\",\"authors\":\"Talgat Subanaliev, S. Croucher, Elira Turdubayeva, S. Kelly\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19409419.2017.1399084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT More than three decades of research on argumentativeness demonstrates that different cultures value differently this aspect of communication. Studies have evaluated levels of argumentativeness in numerous national cultures. This is the first study to explore levels of argumentativeness in Kyrgyzstan. Along with exploring the position of Kyrgyzstan on the argumentativeness continuum, this study also explores the validity and reliability of the Argumentativeness Scale in Kyrgyzstan. Results from 100 Kyrgyzstanis reveal that Kyrgyzstan scores relatively low on the argumentativeness continuum compared to argumentativeness scores from studies conducted in neighboring Asian countries. Furthermore, the sample produced a reliable and valid measure of argumentativeness in Kyrgyzstan.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53456,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Russian Journal of Communication\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"91 - 98\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Russian Journal of Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19409419.2017.1399084\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Journal of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19409419.2017.1399084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

三十多年来对善辩性的研究表明,不同的文化对善辩性的重视程度不同。研究已经评估了许多民族文化中争论的水平。这是第一个探讨吉尔吉斯斯坦争论水平的研究。在探讨吉尔吉斯斯坦在论证连续体上的地位的同时,本研究也探讨了论证量表在吉尔吉斯斯坦的效度和信度。对100名吉尔吉斯斯坦人的调查结果显示,与亚洲邻国的研究结果相比,吉尔吉斯斯坦在争论性连续体上的得分相对较低。此外,该样本在吉尔吉斯斯坦产生了可靠和有效的争论性测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An exploratory analysis of argumentativeness in Kyrgyzstan
ABSTRACT More than three decades of research on argumentativeness demonstrates that different cultures value differently this aspect of communication. Studies have evaluated levels of argumentativeness in numerous national cultures. This is the first study to explore levels of argumentativeness in Kyrgyzstan. Along with exploring the position of Kyrgyzstan on the argumentativeness continuum, this study also explores the validity and reliability of the Argumentativeness Scale in Kyrgyzstan. Results from 100 Kyrgyzstanis reveal that Kyrgyzstan scores relatively low on the argumentativeness continuum compared to argumentativeness scores from studies conducted in neighboring Asian countries. Furthermore, the sample produced a reliable and valid measure of argumentativeness in Kyrgyzstan.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Russian Journal of Communication
Russian Journal of Communication Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Russian Journal of Communication (RJC) is an international peer-reviewed academic publication devoted to studies of communication in, with, and about Russia and Russian-speaking communities around the world. RJC welcomes both humanistic and social scientific scholarly approaches to communication, which is broadly construed to include mediated information as well as face-to-face interactions. RJC seeks papers and book reviews on topics including philosophy of communication, traditional and new media, film, literature, rhetoric, journalism, information-communication technologies, cultural practices, organizational and group dynamics, interpersonal communication, communication in instructional contexts, advertising, public relations, political campaigns, legal proceedings, environmental and health matters, and communication policy.
期刊最新文献
Hashtag activism in Russia: theory and practice Public agenda fragmentation beyond established democracies: the case of Russian online publics in 2017 Leaders of public opinion: political communication with youth in Russia during 2018–2019 Social semiotics: communicative and socio-cultural practices. The Russian-speaking contribution to the development of social semiotics in 1970–2000s Prejudice toward Asians and migrants during the COVID-19 pandemic in Russia and Kyrgyzstan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1