相对密度作为规模-密度管理图表开发的标准化度量

David G. Ray, R. Seymour, S. Fraver, J. Berrill, L. Kenefic, N. Rogers, A. Weiskittel
{"title":"相对密度作为规模-密度管理图表开发的标准化度量","authors":"David G. Ray, R. Seymour, S. Fraver, J. Berrill, L. Kenefic, N. Rogers, A. Weiskittel","doi":"10.1093/jofore/fvad029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Stand density management is central to achieving diverse silvicultural objectives. Decision-support tools in this domain range from expert opinion to sophisticated computer models that vary by forest type, region, and organization. The graphical frameworks represented by density management diagrams (DMDs) and stocking guides (SGs), collectively called size-density management charts (SDMCs), are well established and balance quantitative rigor with user accessibility. Regional differences in species composition and site quality are known to influence maximum size-density relationships, historically limiting the development of reliable charts. Advances in statistical modeling and data availability are overcoming this issue and should encourage more widespread use. We briefly review the history of SDMCs and propose the adoption of relative density based on stand density index as a logical metric for linking the DMD and SG formats. Examples of SDMC construction and use are illustrated for spruce-fir stands in Maine, USA.","PeriodicalId":23386,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Forestry","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relative Density as a Standardizing Metric for the Development of Size-Density Management Charts\",\"authors\":\"David G. Ray, R. Seymour, S. Fraver, J. Berrill, L. Kenefic, N. Rogers, A. Weiskittel\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jofore/fvad029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Stand density management is central to achieving diverse silvicultural objectives. Decision-support tools in this domain range from expert opinion to sophisticated computer models that vary by forest type, region, and organization. The graphical frameworks represented by density management diagrams (DMDs) and stocking guides (SGs), collectively called size-density management charts (SDMCs), are well established and balance quantitative rigor with user accessibility. Regional differences in species composition and site quality are known to influence maximum size-density relationships, historically limiting the development of reliable charts. Advances in statistical modeling and data availability are overcoming this issue and should encourage more widespread use. We briefly review the history of SDMCs and propose the adoption of relative density based on stand density index as a logical metric for linking the DMD and SG formats. Examples of SDMC construction and use are illustrated for spruce-fir stands in Maine, USA.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23386,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish Journal of Forestry\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish Journal of Forestry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jofore/fvad029\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Forestry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jofore/fvad029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

林分密度管理是实现多样化造林目标的核心。该领域的决策支持工具从专家意见到复杂的计算机模型不等,这些模型因森林类型、地区和组织而异。由密度管理图(dmd)和放养指南(SGs)所代表的图形框架,统称为尺寸-密度管理图(sdmc),已经建立良好,并且在定量严谨性和用户可访问性之间取得了平衡。已知物种组成和场地质量的区域差异会影响最大尺寸-密度关系,历史上限制了可靠图表的发展。统计建模和数据可用性方面的进步正在克服这一问题,并应鼓励更广泛的使用。我们简要回顾了sdmc的历史,并提出采用基于林分密度指数的相对密度作为连接DMD和SG格式的逻辑度量。SDMC的建设和使用的例子说明了云杉林在缅因州,美国。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Relative Density as a Standardizing Metric for the Development of Size-Density Management Charts
Stand density management is central to achieving diverse silvicultural objectives. Decision-support tools in this domain range from expert opinion to sophisticated computer models that vary by forest type, region, and organization. The graphical frameworks represented by density management diagrams (DMDs) and stocking guides (SGs), collectively called size-density management charts (SDMCs), are well established and balance quantitative rigor with user accessibility. Regional differences in species composition and site quality are known to influence maximum size-density relationships, historically limiting the development of reliable charts. Advances in statistical modeling and data availability are overcoming this issue and should encourage more widespread use. We briefly review the history of SDMCs and propose the adoption of relative density based on stand density index as a logical metric for linking the DMD and SG formats. Examples of SDMC construction and use are illustrated for spruce-fir stands in Maine, USA.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Batı Karadeniz Bölgesi Kazdağı göknarı ormanlarında göknar ökseotu bulunma ve bulaşma durumu: Kökez Orman İşletme Şefliği örneği Hitit metinlerinde orman Almus yöresi doğal doğu kayını meşcerelerinin çap dağılımının Weibull dağılımı ile modellenmesi Türkiye’nin kuzeybatısındaki bir plantasyonda yerli ve egzotik çam türlerinin ibrelerinde görülen fungal endofitler Assessing Mid-rotation Loblolly Pine and Competing Vegetation Responses to Post-thin Fertilization and Herbicide Application in the Southeastern United States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1