Sarah E. McVay, E. Rodriguez-Vazquez, Sara Toynbee
{"title":"从非公认会计准则中剔除“非”:常规的非公认会计准则使用和投资者定价","authors":"Sarah E. McVay, E. Rodriguez-Vazquez, Sara Toynbee","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3820094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Earnings are an important input for equity investors’ valuation decisions. Managers and analysts increasingly report non-GAAP earnings on an ongoing basis, routinely removing recurring items, such as amortization and stock-based compensation, from GAAP earnings. We document that by 2019, non-GAAP earnings were used in all prior eight quarters for 38 percent of firms. The routine use of non-GAAP earnings for the same firm quarter after quarter suggests that non-GAAP has become the “generally accepted” earnings measure for valuation purposes for a significant portion of publicly-traded firms. We provide evidence that routine non-GAAP usage allows investors to gain experience with non-GAAP earnings that facilitates their pricing of non-GAAP exclusions. Our findings point to a capital markets consequence of the shift from the traditional use of non-GAAP, in which adjustments are made for transitory earnings shocks, to the routine use of non-GAAP, in which adjustments are made for both recurring and transitory components of earnings.","PeriodicalId":12319,"journal":{"name":"Financial Accounting eJournal","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Taking the 'Non' Out of Non-GAAP: Routine Non-GAAP Usage and Investor Pricing\",\"authors\":\"Sarah E. McVay, E. Rodriguez-Vazquez, Sara Toynbee\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3820094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Earnings are an important input for equity investors’ valuation decisions. Managers and analysts increasingly report non-GAAP earnings on an ongoing basis, routinely removing recurring items, such as amortization and stock-based compensation, from GAAP earnings. We document that by 2019, non-GAAP earnings were used in all prior eight quarters for 38 percent of firms. The routine use of non-GAAP earnings for the same firm quarter after quarter suggests that non-GAAP has become the “generally accepted” earnings measure for valuation purposes for a significant portion of publicly-traded firms. We provide evidence that routine non-GAAP usage allows investors to gain experience with non-GAAP earnings that facilitates their pricing of non-GAAP exclusions. Our findings point to a capital markets consequence of the shift from the traditional use of non-GAAP, in which adjustments are made for transitory earnings shocks, to the routine use of non-GAAP, in which adjustments are made for both recurring and transitory components of earnings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12319,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Financial Accounting eJournal\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Financial Accounting eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3820094\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Financial Accounting eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3820094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Taking the 'Non' Out of Non-GAAP: Routine Non-GAAP Usage and Investor Pricing
Earnings are an important input for equity investors’ valuation decisions. Managers and analysts increasingly report non-GAAP earnings on an ongoing basis, routinely removing recurring items, such as amortization and stock-based compensation, from GAAP earnings. We document that by 2019, non-GAAP earnings were used in all prior eight quarters for 38 percent of firms. The routine use of non-GAAP earnings for the same firm quarter after quarter suggests that non-GAAP has become the “generally accepted” earnings measure for valuation purposes for a significant portion of publicly-traded firms. We provide evidence that routine non-GAAP usage allows investors to gain experience with non-GAAP earnings that facilitates their pricing of non-GAAP exclusions. Our findings point to a capital markets consequence of the shift from the traditional use of non-GAAP, in which adjustments are made for transitory earnings shocks, to the routine use of non-GAAP, in which adjustments are made for both recurring and transitory components of earnings.