Romashkinskoye油田Oykino-Altuninsky隆起特稠油热采方案试验与数值分析

A. Pituganova, Taofik H. Nassan, M. Amro, I. Minkhanov, M. Varfolomeev, A. Bolotov
{"title":"Romashkinskoye油田Oykino-Altuninsky隆起特稠油热采方案试验与数值分析","authors":"A. Pituganova, Taofik H. Nassan, M. Amro, I. Minkhanov, M. Varfolomeev, A. Bolotov","doi":"10.2523/iptc-22425-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Crude oil production from conventional oil reservoirs is declining owing to heavy exploitation to meet the global energy market demand which is growing on a yearly basis. Unconventional oil resources, e.g. extra-heavy oil and bitumen, can compensate for this decline if appropriate enhanced oil recovery (EOR) methods are developed to enable economic flow from these resources. The main objective of this study is to set the best practice for the extra-heavy oil production of the Oykino-Altuninsky uplift of the Romashkinskoye oilfield (Tatarstan Republic, Russia). A series of experimental tests are applied on a real unextracted unconsolidated core sample from Romashkinskoye oilfield where the viscosity of the crude oil is above 600,000 cP at reservoir conditions. Different recovery schemes are tested experimentally and sequentially, namely: water flooding, hot water flooding, steam flooding, and finally in-situ combustion (ISC). Furthermore, the complete experimental run is simulated by a standard nonisothermal simulator and the results are compared to the experiments. On contrary to what was expected hot water at 100°C didn’t achieve any recovery from the sample and steam injection recovered only 11,5% of OOIP. ISC-is also known as fire flooding-attained the best recovery which reached 45% after steam flooding. Complete SARA analysis of the original oil and produced oil by steam and ISC is implemented to understand the mechanisms of each process. Numerical modeling is applied to the corresponding laboratory experiments and the results for water, hot water, and steam flooding were in good agreement with the experimental results while the in-situ combustion simulation showed a better recovery factor than experiments. The laboratory and numerical experiments will improve our understanding of the recovery options of Oykino-Altuninsky uplift of the Romashkinskoye oilfield and help the developers to choose the best production sequence for this oilfield particularly. Moreover, the experiments will provide inputs for the field-size numerical model after running more experiments on unconsolidated and consolidated cores.","PeriodicalId":11027,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, February 23, 2022","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental and Numerical Analysis of Thermal EOR Recovery Schemes for Extra-Heavy Oil of the Oykino-Altuninsky Uplift of the Romashkinskoye Oilfield\",\"authors\":\"A. Pituganova, Taofik H. Nassan, M. Amro, I. Minkhanov, M. Varfolomeev, A. Bolotov\",\"doi\":\"10.2523/iptc-22425-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Crude oil production from conventional oil reservoirs is declining owing to heavy exploitation to meet the global energy market demand which is growing on a yearly basis. Unconventional oil resources, e.g. extra-heavy oil and bitumen, can compensate for this decline if appropriate enhanced oil recovery (EOR) methods are developed to enable economic flow from these resources. The main objective of this study is to set the best practice for the extra-heavy oil production of the Oykino-Altuninsky uplift of the Romashkinskoye oilfield (Tatarstan Republic, Russia). A series of experimental tests are applied on a real unextracted unconsolidated core sample from Romashkinskoye oilfield where the viscosity of the crude oil is above 600,000 cP at reservoir conditions. Different recovery schemes are tested experimentally and sequentially, namely: water flooding, hot water flooding, steam flooding, and finally in-situ combustion (ISC). Furthermore, the complete experimental run is simulated by a standard nonisothermal simulator and the results are compared to the experiments. On contrary to what was expected hot water at 100°C didn’t achieve any recovery from the sample and steam injection recovered only 11,5% of OOIP. ISC-is also known as fire flooding-attained the best recovery which reached 45% after steam flooding. Complete SARA analysis of the original oil and produced oil by steam and ISC is implemented to understand the mechanisms of each process. Numerical modeling is applied to the corresponding laboratory experiments and the results for water, hot water, and steam flooding were in good agreement with the experimental results while the in-situ combustion simulation showed a better recovery factor than experiments. The laboratory and numerical experiments will improve our understanding of the recovery options of Oykino-Altuninsky uplift of the Romashkinskoye oilfield and help the developers to choose the best production sequence for this oilfield particularly. Moreover, the experiments will provide inputs for the field-size numerical model after running more experiments on unconsolidated and consolidated cores.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11027,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 3 Wed, February 23, 2022\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 3 Wed, February 23, 2022\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2523/iptc-22425-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Wed, February 23, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2523/iptc-22425-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

常规油藏的原油产量正在下降,这是由于为满足全球能源市场每年不断增长的需求而进行的大量开采。非常规石油资源,如超稠油和沥青,可以弥补这种下降,如果适当的提高石油采收率(EOR)方法开发,使这些资源的经济流动。本研究的主要目的是为Romashkinskoye油田(鞑靼斯坦共和国,俄罗斯)的Oykino-Altuninsky隆起制定超稠油生产的最佳实践。针对Romashkinskoye油田实际未采出未固结岩心样品进行了一系列实验测试,该油藏条件下原油粘度大于60000cp。不同的开采方案进行了实验和顺序测试,即:水驱、热水驱、蒸汽驱,最后是原位燃烧(ISC)。利用标准非等温模拟器对整个实验过程进行了模拟,并与实验结果进行了比较。与预期相反,100°C的热水没有从样品中获得任何回收,蒸汽注入仅回收了11.5%的OOIP。蒸汽驱后,isc又称火驱,采收率达到45%。通过蒸汽和ISC对原始油和采出油进行完整的SARA分析,以了解每个过程的机制。将数值模拟应用于相应的室内实验,水驱、热水驱和蒸汽驱的结果与实验结果吻合较好,而原位燃烧模拟的采收率优于实验。通过室内实验和数值实验,可以加深对Romashkinskoye油田Oykino-Altuninsky隆起采收率选择的认识,特别是可以帮助开发商选择该油田的最佳采油顺序。此外,在对松散岩心和固结岩心进行更多的实验后,实验将为场级数值模型提供输入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Experimental and Numerical Analysis of Thermal EOR Recovery Schemes for Extra-Heavy Oil of the Oykino-Altuninsky Uplift of the Romashkinskoye Oilfield
Crude oil production from conventional oil reservoirs is declining owing to heavy exploitation to meet the global energy market demand which is growing on a yearly basis. Unconventional oil resources, e.g. extra-heavy oil and bitumen, can compensate for this decline if appropriate enhanced oil recovery (EOR) methods are developed to enable economic flow from these resources. The main objective of this study is to set the best practice for the extra-heavy oil production of the Oykino-Altuninsky uplift of the Romashkinskoye oilfield (Tatarstan Republic, Russia). A series of experimental tests are applied on a real unextracted unconsolidated core sample from Romashkinskoye oilfield where the viscosity of the crude oil is above 600,000 cP at reservoir conditions. Different recovery schemes are tested experimentally and sequentially, namely: water flooding, hot water flooding, steam flooding, and finally in-situ combustion (ISC). Furthermore, the complete experimental run is simulated by a standard nonisothermal simulator and the results are compared to the experiments. On contrary to what was expected hot water at 100°C didn’t achieve any recovery from the sample and steam injection recovered only 11,5% of OOIP. ISC-is also known as fire flooding-attained the best recovery which reached 45% after steam flooding. Complete SARA analysis of the original oil and produced oil by steam and ISC is implemented to understand the mechanisms of each process. Numerical modeling is applied to the corresponding laboratory experiments and the results for water, hot water, and steam flooding were in good agreement with the experimental results while the in-situ combustion simulation showed a better recovery factor than experiments. The laboratory and numerical experiments will improve our understanding of the recovery options of Oykino-Altuninsky uplift of the Romashkinskoye oilfield and help the developers to choose the best production sequence for this oilfield particularly. Moreover, the experiments will provide inputs for the field-size numerical model after running more experiments on unconsolidated and consolidated cores.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Data Driven Method to Predict and Restore Missing Well Head Flow Pressure Downhole Camera Run Validates Limited Entry Fracturing Technique and Improves Pay Coverage in Deep Tight Laminated Gas Reservoir of Western India An Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Oil/Gas Composition on the Performance of Carbonated Water Injection CWI SmartPoint Seismic Data Acquisition System Reservoir Characterization for Isolated Porosity from Multi-Frequency Dielectric Measurements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1