书评:《政治经济学的主要概念和原理》

IF 1 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Capital and Class Pub Date : 2023-02-20 DOI:10.1177/03098168231151781b

Daniel Hinze

{"title":"书评:《政治经济学的主要概念和原理》","authors":"Daniel Hinze","doi":"10.1177/03098168231151781b","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"use of the balance sheet metaphor chimes with the ‘hedge fund’ concept employed in another recent study of households’ economic management under neoliberal, financialized capitalism (Bryan & Rafferty 2018). This is a richly provocative, rewarding book that deserves the widest readership, most especially among those wondering why resort to Keynesian-era logic fails to persuade even the presumed beneficiaries of such policies.","PeriodicalId":46258,"journal":{"name":"Capital and Class","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book Review: Main Concepts and Principles of Political Economy\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Hinze\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03098168231151781b\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"use of the balance sheet metaphor chimes with the ‘hedge fund’ concept employed in another recent study of households’ economic management under neoliberal, financialized capitalism (Bryan & Rafferty 2018). This is a richly provocative, rewarding book that deserves the widest readership, most especially among those wondering why resort to Keynesian-era logic fails to persuade even the presumed beneficiaries of such policies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46258,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Capital and Class\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Capital and Class\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03098168231151781b\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Capital and Class","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03098168231151781b","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

资产负债表隐喻的使用与最近另一项关于新自由主义、金融化资本主义下家庭经济管理的研究中使用的“对冲基金”概念相吻合(Bryan & Rafferty 2018)。这是一本极具煽动性、颇有收获的书，值得拥有最广泛的读者，尤其是那些想知道为什么诉诸凯恩斯时代的逻辑连这些政策的假定受益者都说服不了的人。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Book Review: Main Concepts and Principles of Political Economy

use of the balance sheet metaphor chimes with the ‘hedge fund’ concept employed in another recent study of households’ economic management under neoliberal, financialized capitalism (Bryan & Rafferty 2018). This is a richly provocative, rewarding book that deserves the widest readership, most especially among those wondering why resort to Keynesian-era logic fails to persuade even the presumed beneficiaries of such policies.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊