维克多·雨果的《伯格雷夫斯》首演(1843年3月7日)及其接受的叙事建构

IF 0.1 0 LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM Interdisciplinary Literary Studies Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.5325/intelitestud.24.2.0232
Agathe Giraud
{"title":"维克多·雨果的《伯格雷夫斯》首演(1843年3月7日)及其接受的叙事建构","authors":"Agathe Giraud","doi":"10.5325/intelitestud.24.2.0232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:The 7th of March 1843 has constituted a key event in French literature history for nearly a century and a half, but this event was largely fabricated: on the one hand, as early as 1843, it was reconstituted by the discourse of critics opposed to Hugo; on the other hand, in the following decades, this date was made into a major event by the story told in school textbooks. The media coverage of the play as well as the manipulation to which is was subjected actually first marked out the play as an event, thereby determining its ulterior reception: on the few occasions when the play was revived (in 1902 for the centenary of Hugo's birth, and in 1977 when it was produced by Antoine Vitez), both the audience and the critics persistently referred to 1843 and to Les Burgraves's alleged failure, as if it were always to be understood on the basis of its original reception. The narrative construction of 1843 as an event thus conditioned the play's reception when it was revived on such occasions, and the premiere continued to be perceived as a failure, even though the play's first production was in fact a success.","PeriodicalId":40903,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary Literary Studies","volume":"3 1","pages":"232 - 253"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Premiere of Victor Hugo's Les Burgraves (7th of March 1843) and the Narrative Construction of Its Reception\",\"authors\":\"Agathe Giraud\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/intelitestud.24.2.0232\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"abstract:The 7th of March 1843 has constituted a key event in French literature history for nearly a century and a half, but this event was largely fabricated: on the one hand, as early as 1843, it was reconstituted by the discourse of critics opposed to Hugo; on the other hand, in the following decades, this date was made into a major event by the story told in school textbooks. The media coverage of the play as well as the manipulation to which is was subjected actually first marked out the play as an event, thereby determining its ulterior reception: on the few occasions when the play was revived (in 1902 for the centenary of Hugo's birth, and in 1977 when it was produced by Antoine Vitez), both the audience and the critics persistently referred to 1843 and to Les Burgraves's alleged failure, as if it were always to be understood on the basis of its original reception. The narrative construction of 1843 as an event thus conditioned the play's reception when it was revived on such occasions, and the premiere continued to be perceived as a failure, even though the play's first production was in fact a success.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interdisciplinary Literary Studies\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"232 - 253\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interdisciplinary Literary Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/intelitestud.24.2.0232\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary Literary Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/intelitestud.24.2.0232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1843年3月7日是近一个半世纪以来法国文学史上的一个重要事件,但这一事件在很大程度上是虚构的:一方面,早在1843年,它就被反对雨果的批评家话语所重构;另一方面,在接下来的几十年里,这个日子被学校教科书上的故事变成了一个重大事件。媒体对这出戏的报道以及对它的操纵实际上首先将这出戏标记为一个事件,从而决定了它的幕后接受:有几次该剧被重提(1902年雨果诞辰一百周年,1977年由安东尼·维特斯制作),观众和评论家都坚持认为《1843》和《莱斯·伯格雷夫斯》的失败,似乎总是要根据它最初的接受来理解它。因此,1843年作为一个事件的叙事结构决定了戏剧在这种场合重新上演时的接受程度,尽管该剧的第一次演出实际上是成功的,但首演仍然被认为是失败的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Premiere of Victor Hugo's Les Burgraves (7th of March 1843) and the Narrative Construction of Its Reception
abstract:The 7th of March 1843 has constituted a key event in French literature history for nearly a century and a half, but this event was largely fabricated: on the one hand, as early as 1843, it was reconstituted by the discourse of critics opposed to Hugo; on the other hand, in the following decades, this date was made into a major event by the story told in school textbooks. The media coverage of the play as well as the manipulation to which is was subjected actually first marked out the play as an event, thereby determining its ulterior reception: on the few occasions when the play was revived (in 1902 for the centenary of Hugo's birth, and in 1977 when it was produced by Antoine Vitez), both the audience and the critics persistently referred to 1843 and to Les Burgraves's alleged failure, as if it were always to be understood on the basis of its original reception. The narrative construction of 1843 as an event thus conditioned the play's reception when it was revived on such occasions, and the premiere continued to be perceived as a failure, even though the play's first production was in fact a success.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Interdisciplinary Literary Studies
Interdisciplinary Literary Studies LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: Interdisciplinary Literary Studies seeks to explore the interconnections between literary study and other disciplines, ideologies, and cultural methods of critique. All national literatures, periods, and genres are welcomed topics.
期刊最新文献
Negotiating Demons of the Mind: Psychological Distress, Social Apathy and Victimhood in Tagore’s The Garden (Malancha) Discourse and Madness in Shadows in the Sun The Weather Is Dirty: Jane Austen’s Use of Nature as a Social Agent Women’s Dilemma of Love: An Ethical Literary Interpretation of Miss Sophie’s Diary by Ding Ling Improvisation in Jack Kerouac’s “Jazz” Writing: Intersubjectivity, Authenticity, and the Collectivist Utopia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1