{"title":"经皮气管切开术对COVID-19急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者死亡率和重症监护病房住院时间的影响","authors":"G. Alay","doi":"10.14744/etd.2023.63832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of percutaneous tracheotomy on mortality and length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) for patients with COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Materials and Methods: This study included patients with coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19-associated) acute respiratory distress syndrome who were treated with invasive mechanical ventilation in a pandemic intensive care unit. Patients admitted to the pandemic intensive care unit between March and July 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who underwent percutaneous tracheotomy and did not have a tracheotomy during the follow-up were statistically compared in terms of laboratory and clinical characteristics such as mortality and length of stay in the intensive care unit. Results: The study included 102 orotracheally intubated patients diagnosed with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome. The number of tracheotomized and not-tracheotomized patients was 34 and 68, respectively. The mean age of the patients was 60.39 +/- 14.10 years. The mean time to perform percutaneous tracheotomy was 7.94 +/- 6.11 days. There was no significant difference in mortality rate between the two groups (p=0.298). However, patients who underwent tracheotomy had a longer length of stay in the intensive care unit compared to those who did not (35.00 +/- 24.60 days vs 13.20 +/- 11.69 days, p<0.001). Conclusion: Our study found no statistically significant difference in mortality rate between the two groups in our study. Additionally, the length of stay in the intensive care unit was not better in tracheotomized patients. While tracheotomy has some advantages in other severe lung diseases, its effect on mortality in patients with severe lung disease associated with COVID-19 should be evaluated further in randomized controlled trials.","PeriodicalId":43995,"journal":{"name":"Erciyes Medical Journal","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Percutaneus Tracheotomy on Patients with COVID-19 ARDS' Mortality and Length of Stay in The Critical Care Unit\",\"authors\":\"G. Alay\",\"doi\":\"10.14744/etd.2023.63832\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of percutaneous tracheotomy on mortality and length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) for patients with COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Materials and Methods: This study included patients with coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19-associated) acute respiratory distress syndrome who were treated with invasive mechanical ventilation in a pandemic intensive care unit. Patients admitted to the pandemic intensive care unit between March and July 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who underwent percutaneous tracheotomy and did not have a tracheotomy during the follow-up were statistically compared in terms of laboratory and clinical characteristics such as mortality and length of stay in the intensive care unit. Results: The study included 102 orotracheally intubated patients diagnosed with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome. The number of tracheotomized and not-tracheotomized patients was 34 and 68, respectively. The mean age of the patients was 60.39 +/- 14.10 years. The mean time to perform percutaneous tracheotomy was 7.94 +/- 6.11 days. There was no significant difference in mortality rate between the two groups (p=0.298). However, patients who underwent tracheotomy had a longer length of stay in the intensive care unit compared to those who did not (35.00 +/- 24.60 days vs 13.20 +/- 11.69 days, p<0.001). Conclusion: Our study found no statistically significant difference in mortality rate between the two groups in our study. Additionally, the length of stay in the intensive care unit was not better in tracheotomized patients. While tracheotomy has some advantages in other severe lung diseases, its effect on mortality in patients with severe lung disease associated with COVID-19 should be evaluated further in randomized controlled trials.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43995,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Erciyes Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Erciyes Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14744/etd.2023.63832\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Erciyes Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/etd.2023.63832","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Impact of Percutaneus Tracheotomy on Patients with COVID-19 ARDS' Mortality and Length of Stay in The Critical Care Unit
Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of percutaneous tracheotomy on mortality and length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) for patients with COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Materials and Methods: This study included patients with coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19-associated) acute respiratory distress syndrome who were treated with invasive mechanical ventilation in a pandemic intensive care unit. Patients admitted to the pandemic intensive care unit between March and July 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who underwent percutaneous tracheotomy and did not have a tracheotomy during the follow-up were statistically compared in terms of laboratory and clinical characteristics such as mortality and length of stay in the intensive care unit. Results: The study included 102 orotracheally intubated patients diagnosed with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome. The number of tracheotomized and not-tracheotomized patients was 34 and 68, respectively. The mean age of the patients was 60.39 +/- 14.10 years. The mean time to perform percutaneous tracheotomy was 7.94 +/- 6.11 days. There was no significant difference in mortality rate between the two groups (p=0.298). However, patients who underwent tracheotomy had a longer length of stay in the intensive care unit compared to those who did not (35.00 +/- 24.60 days vs 13.20 +/- 11.69 days, p<0.001). Conclusion: Our study found no statistically significant difference in mortality rate between the two groups in our study. Additionally, the length of stay in the intensive care unit was not better in tracheotomized patients. While tracheotomy has some advantages in other severe lung diseases, its effect on mortality in patients with severe lung disease associated with COVID-19 should be evaluated further in randomized controlled trials.
期刊介绍:
Erciyes Medical Journal (Erciyes Med J) is the international, peer-reviewed, open access publication of Erciyes University School of Medicine. The journal, which has been in continuous publication since 1978, is a publication published on March, June, September, and December. The publication language of the journal is English. The journal accepts clinical and experimental research articles in different fields of medicine, original case reports, letters to the editor and invited reviews for publication. Research articles and case reports on regionally frequent and specific medical topics are prioritized. Manuscripts on national and international scientific meetings and symposiums and manuscripts sharing scientific correspondence and scientific knowledge between authors and their readers are also published.