《旧媒体与中世纪概念:早期现代性之前的媒体生态》,索拉·布赖洛、斯蒂芬·m·耶格尔主编

L. Morreale
{"title":"《旧媒体与中世纪概念:早期现代性之前的媒体生态》,索拉·布赖洛、斯蒂芬·m·耶格尔主编","authors":"L. Morreale","doi":"10.1353/mns.2023.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For those of us whose everyday work involves digital medieval studies, it is easy to forget that the pairing of “digital” and “medieval” may seem incongruous and in need of clarification. Old Media and the Medieval Concept: Media Ecologies before Early Modernity takes this explanatory impulse even further, for the collection both assumes a connection and argues for the need to explore it. To wit, the volume’s editors state in their introduction that “there are many urgent reasons to better understand the intuition that forms of medieval texts are uniquely expressive of the forms of digital culture, whose applications extend beyond the merely academic interest that this phenomenon many inspire” (7). The commonalities are puzzled through in an introduction and a series of six thoughtful essays that ruminate on what unites old and new media, thereby inviting readers to think again about the meaning of the concept of media itself. More importantly, the collection asks how and whether the traditions of conceptual exchange have endured despite the oftenunconscious intellectual reflex that tells us that the novel somehow expunges what came before. By grounding terminologies of the digital mindset in their medieval domains, Brandon Hawk’s opening essay immediately refutes the notion that newer forms of expression supersede those of the past. He underscores the lexical relationship of computerenabled concepts to both manual and, by extension, computational labor, which were most visible in the medieval monastic context. For example, Hawk looks first to Isidore for an etymological","PeriodicalId":40527,"journal":{"name":"Manuscript Studies-A Journal of the Schoenberg Institute for Manuscript Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Old Media and the Medieval Concept: Media Ecologies before Early Modernity ed. by Thora Brylow and Stephen M. Yeager (review)\",\"authors\":\"L. Morreale\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/mns.2023.0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For those of us whose everyday work involves digital medieval studies, it is easy to forget that the pairing of “digital” and “medieval” may seem incongruous and in need of clarification. Old Media and the Medieval Concept: Media Ecologies before Early Modernity takes this explanatory impulse even further, for the collection both assumes a connection and argues for the need to explore it. To wit, the volume’s editors state in their introduction that “there are many urgent reasons to better understand the intuition that forms of medieval texts are uniquely expressive of the forms of digital culture, whose applications extend beyond the merely academic interest that this phenomenon many inspire” (7). The commonalities are puzzled through in an introduction and a series of six thoughtful essays that ruminate on what unites old and new media, thereby inviting readers to think again about the meaning of the concept of media itself. More importantly, the collection asks how and whether the traditions of conceptual exchange have endured despite the oftenunconscious intellectual reflex that tells us that the novel somehow expunges what came before. By grounding terminologies of the digital mindset in their medieval domains, Brandon Hawk’s opening essay immediately refutes the notion that newer forms of expression supersede those of the past. He underscores the lexical relationship of computerenabled concepts to both manual and, by extension, computational labor, which were most visible in the medieval monastic context. For example, Hawk looks first to Isidore for an etymological\",\"PeriodicalId\":40527,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Manuscript Studies-A Journal of the Schoenberg Institute for Manuscript Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Manuscript Studies-A Journal of the Schoenberg Institute for Manuscript Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/mns.2023.0007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manuscript Studies-A Journal of the Schoenberg Institute for Manuscript Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/mns.2023.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于我们这些日常工作涉及数字中世纪研究的人来说,很容易忘记“数字”和“中世纪”的配对可能看起来不协调,需要澄清。《旧媒体和中世纪概念:早期现代性之前的媒体生态》进一步推动了这一解释,因为该系列既假设了一种联系,又提出了探索这种联系的必要性。也就是说,这本书的编辑在前言中指出,“有许多迫切的理由来更好地理解中世纪文本的形式是数字文化形式的独特表达,其应用超出了这种现象所激发的仅仅是学术兴趣”(7)。这些共性在引言和一系列六篇深思熟虑的文章中被困惑了,这些文章反思了是什么将新旧媒体联系在一起。从而邀请读者重新思考媒体概念本身的意义。更重要的是,这本合集询问了观念交流的传统是如何以及是否能够持续下去的,尽管经常无意识的智力反射告诉我们,这部小说在某种程度上抹去了以前的东西。通过将数字思维的术语置于中世纪的领域,布兰登·霍克的开篇文章立即驳斥了新表达形式取代过去表达形式的观点。他强调了计算机化概念与手工和计算劳动的词汇关系,这在中世纪修道院的语境中最为明显。例如,霍克首先向伊西多尔寻求词源
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Old Media and the Medieval Concept: Media Ecologies before Early Modernity ed. by Thora Brylow and Stephen M. Yeager (review)
For those of us whose everyday work involves digital medieval studies, it is easy to forget that the pairing of “digital” and “medieval” may seem incongruous and in need of clarification. Old Media and the Medieval Concept: Media Ecologies before Early Modernity takes this explanatory impulse even further, for the collection both assumes a connection and argues for the need to explore it. To wit, the volume’s editors state in their introduction that “there are many urgent reasons to better understand the intuition that forms of medieval texts are uniquely expressive of the forms of digital culture, whose applications extend beyond the merely academic interest that this phenomenon many inspire” (7). The commonalities are puzzled through in an introduction and a series of six thoughtful essays that ruminate on what unites old and new media, thereby inviting readers to think again about the meaning of the concept of media itself. More importantly, the collection asks how and whether the traditions of conceptual exchange have endured despite the oftenunconscious intellectual reflex that tells us that the novel somehow expunges what came before. By grounding terminologies of the digital mindset in their medieval domains, Brandon Hawk’s opening essay immediately refutes the notion that newer forms of expression supersede those of the past. He underscores the lexical relationship of computerenabled concepts to both manual and, by extension, computational labor, which were most visible in the medieval monastic context. For example, Hawk looks first to Isidore for an etymological
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Renaissance chests from the collection of the Pskov Museum-Reserve: Artistic features and attribution issues The period of studies of the artist M. Kh. Alajalov at the Moscow School of Painting, Sculpture and Architecture Perceptions of Medieval Manuscripts: The Phenomenal Book by Elaine Treharne Visualizing Household Health: Medieval Women, Art, and Knowledge in the Régime du corps by Jennifer Borland (review) George D. Smith (1870–1920), Bernard Alfred Quaritch (1871–1913), and the Trade in Medieval European Manuscripts in the United States ca. 1890–1920
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1