右美托咪定在降低喉镜下血流动力学反应中的作用-一项剂量研究

A. Sm, Siddique M,, Abbas Mq, Farooq Mf, Malik S, Khan Ha
{"title":"右美托咪定在降低喉镜下血流动力学反应中的作用-一项剂量研究","authors":"A. Sm, Siddique M,, Abbas Mq, Farooq Mf, Malik S, Khan Ha","doi":"10.53350/pjmhs202317696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Determining efficacy of pre-operative bolus dose of dexmedetomidine 0.75 and 0.5µg/kg as an infusion and compare it with placebo in attenuation of hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation (LTI). Design: Double-blind randomized control. Place & duration: Sindh Institute of Urology & Transplantation, Karachi, Pakistan, from August 2019 to August 2021. Methodology: Patients were stratified into three groups. Group A received normal saline (NS), Group B received dexmedetomidine 0.5 μ/kg and Group C received dexmedetomidine 0.75 μ/kg as an infusion over 10 minutes followed by standardized general anaesthesia. Primary outcome measures were hemodynamic variables at 1, 3, 5 and 10 minutes post LTI. Secondary outcome measures were adverse effects related to dexmedetomidine. Results: Both dexmedetomidine groups showed better attenuation of hemodynamic response to LTI thansaline group. Dexmedetomidine 0.75 µg/kg attenuated hemodynamic response to LTIsignificantly better thandexmedetomidine 0.5 μ/kgand placebo without causing any statistically significant adverse effects. Practical implication: The function of dexmedetomidine in attenuating hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy has several practical implications, including improved patient safety, optimal dosing, reduced anaesthetic requirements, cost-effective treatment, and enhanced patient comfort. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine 0.75 µg/kg efficient than 0.5 µg/kg and placebo in attenuating hemodynamic response to LTI when given as a pre-induction bolus. Keywords: Anesthesia; Dexmedetomidine, Laryngoscopy, Intubation, Stress Response.","PeriodicalId":19842,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Medical and Health Sciences","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of Dexmedetomidine in Attenuation of Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy - A Dose-Finding Study\",\"authors\":\"A. Sm, Siddique M,, Abbas Mq, Farooq Mf, Malik S, Khan Ha\",\"doi\":\"10.53350/pjmhs202317696\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: Determining efficacy of pre-operative bolus dose of dexmedetomidine 0.75 and 0.5µg/kg as an infusion and compare it with placebo in attenuation of hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation (LTI). Design: Double-blind randomized control. Place & duration: Sindh Institute of Urology & Transplantation, Karachi, Pakistan, from August 2019 to August 2021. Methodology: Patients were stratified into three groups. Group A received normal saline (NS), Group B received dexmedetomidine 0.5 μ/kg and Group C received dexmedetomidine 0.75 μ/kg as an infusion over 10 minutes followed by standardized general anaesthesia. Primary outcome measures were hemodynamic variables at 1, 3, 5 and 10 minutes post LTI. Secondary outcome measures were adverse effects related to dexmedetomidine. Results: Both dexmedetomidine groups showed better attenuation of hemodynamic response to LTI thansaline group. Dexmedetomidine 0.75 µg/kg attenuated hemodynamic response to LTIsignificantly better thandexmedetomidine 0.5 μ/kgand placebo without causing any statistically significant adverse effects. Practical implication: The function of dexmedetomidine in attenuating hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy has several practical implications, including improved patient safety, optimal dosing, reduced anaesthetic requirements, cost-effective treatment, and enhanced patient comfort. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine 0.75 µg/kg efficient than 0.5 µg/kg and placebo in attenuating hemodynamic response to LTI when given as a pre-induction bolus. Keywords: Anesthesia; Dexmedetomidine, Laryngoscopy, Intubation, Stress Response.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19842,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pakistan Journal of Medical and Health Sciences\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pakistan Journal of Medical and Health Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs202317696\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Medical and Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs202317696","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨术前大剂量右美托咪定0.75和0.5µg/kg输注对喉镜和气管插管血流动力学反应的影响,并与安慰剂进行比较。设计:双盲随机对照。地点和时间:2019年8月至2021年8月,巴基斯坦卡拉奇Sindh泌尿外科和移植研究所。方法:将患者分为三组。A组患者给予生理盐水(NS), B组患者给予右美托咪定0.5 μ/kg, C组患者给予右美托咪定0.75 μ/kg静脉滴注10 min后进行标准化全身麻醉。主要结局指标是LTI后1、3、5和10分钟的血流动力学变量。次要结局指标为与右美托咪定相关的不良反应。结果:右美托咪定组和右美托咪定组对LTI血流动力学反应的衰减均优于生理盐水组。右美托咪定0.75 μ g/kg能明显减弱ldi患者的血流动力学反应,明显优于右美托咪定0.5 μ/kg和安慰剂,且无统计学上显著的不良反应。实际意义:右美托咪定在减轻喉镜血流动力学反应中的作用有几个实际意义,包括提高患者安全性,优化剂量,减少麻醉需求,经济有效的治疗,增强患者舒适度。结论:右美托咪定0.75µg/kg诱导前给药时,在降低LTI血流动力学反应方面比0.5µg/kg和安慰剂有效。关键词:麻醉;右美托咪定,喉镜检查,插管,应激反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Role of Dexmedetomidine in Attenuation of Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy - A Dose-Finding Study
Aim: Determining efficacy of pre-operative bolus dose of dexmedetomidine 0.75 and 0.5µg/kg as an infusion and compare it with placebo in attenuation of hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation (LTI). Design: Double-blind randomized control. Place & duration: Sindh Institute of Urology & Transplantation, Karachi, Pakistan, from August 2019 to August 2021. Methodology: Patients were stratified into three groups. Group A received normal saline (NS), Group B received dexmedetomidine 0.5 μ/kg and Group C received dexmedetomidine 0.75 μ/kg as an infusion over 10 minutes followed by standardized general anaesthesia. Primary outcome measures were hemodynamic variables at 1, 3, 5 and 10 minutes post LTI. Secondary outcome measures were adverse effects related to dexmedetomidine. Results: Both dexmedetomidine groups showed better attenuation of hemodynamic response to LTI thansaline group. Dexmedetomidine 0.75 µg/kg attenuated hemodynamic response to LTIsignificantly better thandexmedetomidine 0.5 μ/kgand placebo without causing any statistically significant adverse effects. Practical implication: The function of dexmedetomidine in attenuating hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy has several practical implications, including improved patient safety, optimal dosing, reduced anaesthetic requirements, cost-effective treatment, and enhanced patient comfort. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine 0.75 µg/kg efficient than 0.5 µg/kg and placebo in attenuating hemodynamic response to LTI when given as a pre-induction bolus. Keywords: Anesthesia; Dexmedetomidine, Laryngoscopy, Intubation, Stress Response.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinical Profile and Outcomes of Primary PCI in Patients with Acute STEMI The Prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations in Breast Cancer Patients Association Between Body Mass Index (BMI) and Occurrence of Esophageal Cancer Effects of Dietary Factors on Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) Among the Student and Faculty of Public and Private Medical Universities of Karachi, Pakistan Positivity of BRCA 1 & 2 Mutations in Ovarian Cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1