前列腺癌检测的多参数MRI评分:有无直肠内线圈患者的表现

R. Fusco, A. Petrillo, S. Setola, V. Granata, N. Raiano, P. Delprete, G. Quarto, Aless, ro Izzo Sisto Perdona
{"title":"前列腺癌检测的多参数MRI评分:有无直肠内线圈患者的表现","authors":"R. Fusco, A. Petrillo, S. Setola, V. Granata, N. Raiano, P. Delprete, G. Quarto, Aless, ro Izzo Sisto Perdona","doi":"10.14303/Imaging-Medicine.1000094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To assess the diagnostic performance of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), in the detection of prostate cancer in two different coil setting: endorectal coil (ERC) versus phased array coil alone (PAC). Materials and Methods: The study included 302 out of 395 consecutive patients with PSA values between 2.5-4 ng/ml and an abnormal Digital Rectal Examination (DRE), or patients with PSA values between 4-10ng/ml, independently from DRE. Each patient provided informed consent to undergo at serum free/total PSA ratio (f/t PSA) assay, morphological MRI (mMRI), DWI, MRS, and Trans Rectal Ultrasonography (TRUS) biopsy. The MRI data sets were scored singularly and then mMRI, DWI and MRS data were combined in a single score (cMRI score). cMRI score was correlated to negative biopsies and Gleason score biopsies. ROC curve and McNemar tests were performed. Results: cMRI score showed high value of sensitivity and NPV for both coil setting (84% and 93% respectively using ERC, 87% and 87% respectively using PAC). cMRI score using ERC did not show statistical superiority compared with cMRI score using PAC alone (p value at McNemar test > 0.05). A significant correlation was obtained comparing the cMRI score to the Gleason score for both coil conditions. Conclusions: Pelvic phased array coil imaging of the prostate produces high quality images and the overall performance in prostate cancer detection is equal than those obtained with endorectal coil imaging.","PeriodicalId":13333,"journal":{"name":"Imaging in Medicine","volume":"86 1","pages":"21-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A multiparametric MRI score for prostate cancer detection: Performance in patients with and without endorectal coil\",\"authors\":\"R. Fusco, A. Petrillo, S. Setola, V. Granata, N. Raiano, P. Delprete, G. Quarto, Aless, ro Izzo Sisto Perdona\",\"doi\":\"10.14303/Imaging-Medicine.1000094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: To assess the diagnostic performance of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), in the detection of prostate cancer in two different coil setting: endorectal coil (ERC) versus phased array coil alone (PAC). Materials and Methods: The study included 302 out of 395 consecutive patients with PSA values between 2.5-4 ng/ml and an abnormal Digital Rectal Examination (DRE), or patients with PSA values between 4-10ng/ml, independently from DRE. Each patient provided informed consent to undergo at serum free/total PSA ratio (f/t PSA) assay, morphological MRI (mMRI), DWI, MRS, and Trans Rectal Ultrasonography (TRUS) biopsy. The MRI data sets were scored singularly and then mMRI, DWI and MRS data were combined in a single score (cMRI score). cMRI score was correlated to negative biopsies and Gleason score biopsies. ROC curve and McNemar tests were performed. Results: cMRI score showed high value of sensitivity and NPV for both coil setting (84% and 93% respectively using ERC, 87% and 87% respectively using PAC). cMRI score using ERC did not show statistical superiority compared with cMRI score using PAC alone (p value at McNemar test > 0.05). A significant correlation was obtained comparing the cMRI score to the Gleason score for both coil conditions. Conclusions: Pelvic phased array coil imaging of the prostate produces high quality images and the overall performance in prostate cancer detection is equal than those obtained with endorectal coil imaging.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Imaging in Medicine\",\"volume\":\"86 1\",\"pages\":\"21-28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Imaging in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14303/Imaging-Medicine.1000094\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Imaging in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14303/Imaging-Medicine.1000094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)在两种不同线圈设置下检测前列腺癌的诊断性能:直肠内线圈(ERC)与单独相控阵线圈(PAC)。材料和方法:该研究纳入了395例PSA值在2.5-4 ng/ml之间且直肠指检(DRE)异常的患者中的302例,或PSA值在4-10ng/ml之间且独立于DRE的患者。每位患者均提供知情同意,接受血清游离/总PSA比(f/t PSA)测定、形态MRI (mMRI)、DWI、MRS和经直肠超声检查(TRUS)活检。MRI数据集单独评分,然后将mMRI、DWI和MRS数据合并为一个评分(cMRI评分)。cMRI评分与阴性活检和Gleason评分相关。进行ROC曲线和McNemar检验。结果:cMRI评分对两种线圈设置的敏感性和NPV值均较高(ERC分别为84%和93%,PAC分别为87%和87%)。使用ERC的cMRI评分与单独使用PAC的cMRI评分相比没有统计学上的优势(McNemar检验的p值为0.05)。在两种线圈条件下,比较cMRI评分与Gleason评分获得了显著的相关性。结论:盆腔相控阵线圈摄护腺成像成像质量高,在前列腺癌检测中的总体表现与直肠内线圈摄护腺成像相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A multiparametric MRI score for prostate cancer detection: Performance in patients with and without endorectal coil
Purpose: To assess the diagnostic performance of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), in the detection of prostate cancer in two different coil setting: endorectal coil (ERC) versus phased array coil alone (PAC). Materials and Methods: The study included 302 out of 395 consecutive patients with PSA values between 2.5-4 ng/ml and an abnormal Digital Rectal Examination (DRE), or patients with PSA values between 4-10ng/ml, independently from DRE. Each patient provided informed consent to undergo at serum free/total PSA ratio (f/t PSA) assay, morphological MRI (mMRI), DWI, MRS, and Trans Rectal Ultrasonography (TRUS) biopsy. The MRI data sets were scored singularly and then mMRI, DWI and MRS data were combined in a single score (cMRI score). cMRI score was correlated to negative biopsies and Gleason score biopsies. ROC curve and McNemar tests were performed. Results: cMRI score showed high value of sensitivity and NPV for both coil setting (84% and 93% respectively using ERC, 87% and 87% respectively using PAC). cMRI score using ERC did not show statistical superiority compared with cMRI score using PAC alone (p value at McNemar test > 0.05). A significant correlation was obtained comparing the cMRI score to the Gleason score for both coil conditions. Conclusions: Pelvic phased array coil imaging of the prostate produces high quality images and the overall performance in prostate cancer detection is equal than those obtained with endorectal coil imaging.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nasal NK/T-cell lymphoma: Clinical features and dermoscopic appearances Cardiac Metastasis In A Patient With Poorly-differentiated Neuroendorcrine Tumor: 18F-FDG PET-CT Finding Carcinoma of tongue in xeroderma pigmentosum a medical image Saffron Extract Prevents Vancomycin-induced Nephrotoxicity Genital Self-mutilation In Schizophreni
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1