情绪多元化短评总结

Mohammed Al-Dhelaan, A. Al-Suhaim
{"title":"情绪多元化短评总结","authors":"Mohammed Al-Dhelaan, A. Al-Suhaim","doi":"10.1145/3106426.3106525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the abundance of reviews published on the Web about a given product, consumers are looking for ways to view major opinions that can be presented in a quick and succinct way. Reviews contain many different opinions, making the ability to show a diversified review summary that focus on coverage and diversity a major goal. Most review summarization work focuses on showing salient reviews as a summary which might ignore diversity in summaries. In this paper, we present a graph-based algorithm that is capable of producing extractive summaries that are both diversified from a sentiment point of view and topically well-covered. First, we use statistical measures to find topical words. Then we split the dataset based on the sentiment class of the reviews and perform the ranking on each sentiment graph. When compared with different baselines, our approach scores best in most ROUGE metrics. Specifically, our approach shows improvements of 3.9% in ROUGE-1 and 1.8% in ROUGE-L in comparison with the best competing baseline.","PeriodicalId":20685,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sentiment diversification for short review summarization\",\"authors\":\"Mohammed Al-Dhelaan, A. Al-Suhaim\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3106426.3106525\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the abundance of reviews published on the Web about a given product, consumers are looking for ways to view major opinions that can be presented in a quick and succinct way. Reviews contain many different opinions, making the ability to show a diversified review summary that focus on coverage and diversity a major goal. Most review summarization work focuses on showing salient reviews as a summary which might ignore diversity in summaries. In this paper, we present a graph-based algorithm that is capable of producing extractive summaries that are both diversified from a sentiment point of view and topically well-covered. First, we use statistical measures to find topical words. Then we split the dataset based on the sentiment class of the reviews and perform the ranking on each sentiment graph. When compared with different baselines, our approach scores best in most ROUGE metrics. Specifically, our approach shows improvements of 3.9% in ROUGE-1 and 1.8% in ROUGE-L in comparison with the best competing baseline.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20685,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3106426.3106525\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3106426.3106525","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

随着网络上发布的关于某一产品的大量评论,消费者正在寻找能够以快速、简洁的方式显示主要意见的方法。评审包含了许多不同的意见,这使得能够显示一个专注于覆盖范围和多样性的多样化评审总结成为一个主要目标。大多数评论总结工作都侧重于将突出的评论作为摘要显示,这可能会忽略摘要的多样性。在本文中,我们提出了一种基于图的算法,该算法能够生成从情感角度多样化且主题覆盖良好的摘录摘要。首先,我们使用统计方法来寻找热门词汇。然后根据评论的情感类对数据集进行拆分,并对每个情感图进行排序。当与不同的基线进行比较时,我们的方法在大多数ROUGE指标中得分最高。具体来说,我们的方法显示,与最佳竞争基线相比,ROUGE-1和ROUGE-L的改进分别为3.9%和1.8%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sentiment diversification for short review summarization
With the abundance of reviews published on the Web about a given product, consumers are looking for ways to view major opinions that can be presented in a quick and succinct way. Reviews contain many different opinions, making the ability to show a diversified review summary that focus on coverage and diversity a major goal. Most review summarization work focuses on showing salient reviews as a summary which might ignore diversity in summaries. In this paper, we present a graph-based algorithm that is capable of producing extractive summaries that are both diversified from a sentiment point of view and topically well-covered. First, we use statistical measures to find topical words. Then we split the dataset based on the sentiment class of the reviews and perform the ranking on each sentiment graph. When compared with different baselines, our approach scores best in most ROUGE metrics. Specifically, our approach shows improvements of 3.9% in ROUGE-1 and 1.8% in ROUGE-L in comparison with the best competing baseline.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
WIMS 2020: The 10th International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics, Biarritz, France, June 30 - July 3, 2020 A deep learning approach for web service interactions Partial sums-based P-Rank computation in information networks Mining ordinal data under human response uncertainty Haste makes waste: a case to favour voting bots
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1