Mahin Nomali, Aryan Ayati, Mohammad Yadegari, Mahdis Nomali, Mahnaz Modanloo
{"title":"重症监护室成人患者的身体约束及相关因素:伊朗北部横断面研究。","authors":"Mahin Nomali, Aryan Ayati, Mohammad Yadegari, Mahdis Nomali, Mahnaz Modanloo","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>Patients in the intensive care units (ICUs) are at high risk of developing delirium and agitation. Physical restraint (PR) has increased to control these patients which accompanies by adverse consequences. The aim was to determine the PR use and associated factors in patients hospitalized at the ICUs in the North of Iran.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, a total of 272 patients in 3 ICUs of 5 Azar referral hospital affiliated to Golestan University of Medical Sciences (Gorgan, Iran) in 2018 were included. Confusion assessment method for the ICU (CAM-ICU), Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS), acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II), and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) were used to evaluate delirium, sedation level, disease severity, and level of consciousness, respectively. Analysis was done by STATA version 14.2 (StataCorp LP, College Station, Texas), univariate and multiple analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 272 patients were analyzed (mean age of 45.8 ± 21.3 years). PR was used for 74.5% of patients. Restrained patients had more severe disease [mean of APACHE II score, 20.20 (7.5) vs 11.6 (7.1)], longer length of stay [mean of 10 (5.5) vs 5.5 (4.6) days], and lower level of consciousness [mean of GCS score, 8.7 (3.5) vs 13.5 (3.3)] than patients without it. CAM-ICU was positive in majority of patients (79.5 vs 10.4%) and agitation level of RASS score was higher in restrained patients (31.7 vs 3.0%). Associated factors in multiple analysis were use of sedative and psychoactive drugs [odds ratio (OR), 2.85; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.04-7.82], presence of delirium (OR, 15.13; 95% CI: 4.61-49.65), deep sedation (OR, 0.04; 95% CI: 0.00-0.45), and GCS score (OR, 0.69; 95% CI: 0.53-0.9).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study revealed the high use of PR in the ICUs, and use of sedative and psychoactive drugs, presence of delirium, deep sedation, and GCS score were such associated factors.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Nomali M, Ayati A, Yadegari M, Nomali M, Modanloo M. Physical Restraint and Associated Factors in Adult Patients in Intensive Care Units: A Cross-sectional Study in North of Iran. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(2):192-198.</p>","PeriodicalId":48208,"journal":{"name":"Disability & Society","volume":"21 1","pages":"192-198"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8857706/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physical Restraint and Associated Factors in Adult Patients in Intensive Care Units: A Cross-sectional Study in North of Iran.\",\"authors\":\"Mahin Nomali, Aryan Ayati, Mohammad Yadegari, Mahdis Nomali, Mahnaz Modanloo\",\"doi\":\"10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>Patients in the intensive care units (ICUs) are at high risk of developing delirium and agitation. Physical restraint (PR) has increased to control these patients which accompanies by adverse consequences. The aim was to determine the PR use and associated factors in patients hospitalized at the ICUs in the North of Iran.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, a total of 272 patients in 3 ICUs of 5 Azar referral hospital affiliated to Golestan University of Medical Sciences (Gorgan, Iran) in 2018 were included. Confusion assessment method for the ICU (CAM-ICU), Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS), acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II), and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) were used to evaluate delirium, sedation level, disease severity, and level of consciousness, respectively. Analysis was done by STATA version 14.2 (StataCorp LP, College Station, Texas), univariate and multiple analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 272 patients were analyzed (mean age of 45.8 ± 21.3 years). PR was used for 74.5% of patients. Restrained patients had more severe disease [mean of APACHE II score, 20.20 (7.5) vs 11.6 (7.1)], longer length of stay [mean of 10 (5.5) vs 5.5 (4.6) days], and lower level of consciousness [mean of GCS score, 8.7 (3.5) vs 13.5 (3.3)] than patients without it. CAM-ICU was positive in majority of patients (79.5 vs 10.4%) and agitation level of RASS score was higher in restrained patients (31.7 vs 3.0%). Associated factors in multiple analysis were use of sedative and psychoactive drugs [odds ratio (OR), 2.85; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.04-7.82], presence of delirium (OR, 15.13; 95% CI: 4.61-49.65), deep sedation (OR, 0.04; 95% CI: 0.00-0.45), and GCS score (OR, 0.69; 95% CI: 0.53-0.9).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study revealed the high use of PR in the ICUs, and use of sedative and psychoactive drugs, presence of delirium, deep sedation, and GCS score were such associated factors.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Nomali M, Ayati A, Yadegari M, Nomali M, Modanloo M. Physical Restraint and Associated Factors in Adult Patients in Intensive Care Units: A Cross-sectional Study in North of Iran. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(2):192-198.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48208,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disability & Society\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"192-198\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8857706/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disability & Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24103\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24103","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景/目的:重症监护病房(ICU)中的病人极易出现谵妄和躁动。为了控制这些病人,越来越多的人使用物理约束(PR),但同时也带来了不良后果。研究的目的是确定伊朗北部重症监护室住院病人使用束缚措施的情况及相关因素:在这项横断面研究中,共纳入了 2018 年戈勒斯坦医科大学(伊朗戈尔甘)附属 5 Azar 转诊医院 3 个重症监护室的 272 名患者。分别采用重症监护室谵妄评估法(CAM-ICU)、里士满躁动镇静量表(RASS)、急性生理学和慢性健康评估 II(APACHE II)以及格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)来评估谵妄、镇静水平、疾病严重程度和意识水平。分析采用 STATA 14.2 版(StataCorp LP,College Station,Texas),进行单变量和多重分析:分析了 272 名患者的数据(平均年龄为 45.8 ± 21.3 岁)。74.5%的患者使用了PR。与无限制措施的患者相比,限制措施患者的病情更严重[APACHE II 评分平均值为 20.20 (7.5) vs 11.6 (7.1)],住院时间更长[平均为 10 (5.5) vs 5.5 (4.6) 天],意识水平更低[GCS 评分平均值为 8.7 (3.5) vs 13.5 (3.3)]。大多数患者的 CAM-ICU 评分呈阳性(79.5% 对 10.4%),受限患者的 RASS 评分躁动程度更高(31.7% 对 3.0%)。多重分析中的相关因素包括使用镇静和精神活性药物[几率比(OR),2.85;95% 置信区间(CI):1.04-7.82]、存在谵妄(OR,15.13;95% CI:4.61-49.65)、深度镇静(OR,0.04;95% CI:0.00-0.45)和 GCS 评分(OR,0.69;95% CI:0.53-0.9):该研究表明,重症监护室中 PR 的使用率很高,而镇静和精神活性药物的使用、谵妄的存在、深度镇静和 GCS 评分是相关因素:Nomali M, Ayati A, Yadegari M, Nomali M, Modanloo M. 重症监护病房成人患者的物理约束及相关因素:伊朗北部横断面研究》。Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(2):192-198.
Physical Restraint and Associated Factors in Adult Patients in Intensive Care Units: A Cross-sectional Study in North of Iran.
Background/aim: Patients in the intensive care units (ICUs) are at high risk of developing delirium and agitation. Physical restraint (PR) has increased to control these patients which accompanies by adverse consequences. The aim was to determine the PR use and associated factors in patients hospitalized at the ICUs in the North of Iran.
Materials and methods: In this cross-sectional study, a total of 272 patients in 3 ICUs of 5 Azar referral hospital affiliated to Golestan University of Medical Sciences (Gorgan, Iran) in 2018 were included. Confusion assessment method for the ICU (CAM-ICU), Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS), acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II), and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) were used to evaluate delirium, sedation level, disease severity, and level of consciousness, respectively. Analysis was done by STATA version 14.2 (StataCorp LP, College Station, Texas), univariate and multiple analyses.
Results: Data from 272 patients were analyzed (mean age of 45.8 ± 21.3 years). PR was used for 74.5% of patients. Restrained patients had more severe disease [mean of APACHE II score, 20.20 (7.5) vs 11.6 (7.1)], longer length of stay [mean of 10 (5.5) vs 5.5 (4.6) days], and lower level of consciousness [mean of GCS score, 8.7 (3.5) vs 13.5 (3.3)] than patients without it. CAM-ICU was positive in majority of patients (79.5 vs 10.4%) and agitation level of RASS score was higher in restrained patients (31.7 vs 3.0%). Associated factors in multiple analysis were use of sedative and psychoactive drugs [odds ratio (OR), 2.85; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.04-7.82], presence of delirium (OR, 15.13; 95% CI: 4.61-49.65), deep sedation (OR, 0.04; 95% CI: 0.00-0.45), and GCS score (OR, 0.69; 95% CI: 0.53-0.9).
Conclusion: This study revealed the high use of PR in the ICUs, and use of sedative and psychoactive drugs, presence of delirium, deep sedation, and GCS score were such associated factors.
How to cite this article: Nomali M, Ayati A, Yadegari M, Nomali M, Modanloo M. Physical Restraint and Associated Factors in Adult Patients in Intensive Care Units: A Cross-sectional Study in North of Iran. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(2):192-198.