{"title":"结直肠癌性别差异的病因学研究。","authors":"M. Allam, R. A. Lucena","doi":"10.1097/00008469-200106000-00016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aetiology of sex differences in colorectal cancer Ž is controversial. Fernandez et al. European Journal ́ . of Cancer Pre ention 9: 99 104, 2000 explained favourable trends for women analysing colorectal mortality sex ratio trends in major European countries over the last four decades. Their conclusions were based on the protective effect of female hormones, including replacement therapy and oral conŽ . traceptives. McMichael and Potter 1980 raised this hypothesis for the first time after narrative review Ž . study. Meanwhile, MacLennan et al. 1995 reported no association after their meta-analysis study. We think that this protective effect could be excluded on seeing the colorectal cancer mortality rates among women during the last 40 years. It is obvious that in Ž nearly all Northern countries Sweden, Switzerland, UK, Scotland, Austria, Belgium, The Netherlands . and Norway , in spite of lowering use of oral contraŽ . ceptives IARC, 1999 , these rates are decreasing. In general, the colorectal cancer mortality rate among females in nearly all Northern countries is falling compared with the increase in all Southern countries. Perhaps these contradictions come from other unconsidered risk factors, which must be taken into account. Sex-specific mortalities could be an explanation for the favourable trends for women in colorectal cancer. According to WHO, among males in the age group 35 39 years suicide is the principal cause of mortality, and between 40 and 64 years acute myocardial infarction, leaving the field open for different types of cancer, such as lung cancer and colorectal cancer. For women between 35 and 64 years breast cancer is the principal cause of mortality, leaving a small percentage of women vulnerable for colorectal Ž cancer Anuario de la Sanidad y del Medicamento . en Espana, 2000 . Moreover, breast cancer, the most ̃ frequent malignancy among females with rising incidence in all European countries over the last 50 years, represents the majority of female proportional Ž mortality attributed to cancer Boring et al., 1993; . Morillo et al., 2000 . These point at selective mortality among females by breast cancer, a cancer known to be more frequent among females using exogenous Ž . hormones Kelsey and Bernstein, 1996 . The possible carcinogenic role of smoking in colorectal cancer is a cause for concern. Many previous Ž studies Potter, 1996; Tulinius et al., 1997; World Cancer Research Fund and American Institute for . Cancer Research, 1997; Slattery et al., 1998 have considered smoking as a possible risk factor for colorectal cancer, especially rectal cancer. Smoking is well known to be more prevalent among males than females. In Spain, the male to female ratio of smoking in the population older than 15 years is 1.7, a ratio that coincides with that recorded for colorecŽ tal cancer mortality rate Castillejo and Mercade,́ . 2000 . We agree with Fernandez et al. in singling out ́ alcohol drinking as a possible risk factor for colorectal cancer. For example, Hungary in 1994, where the Ž alcohol consumption was quite high 10.2 litres of . pure alcohol per person yearly , had the highest age-standardized mortality rate both for men and women. In general, countries with high colorectal cancer mortality rates, especially from 1990 to 1994, are the countries with the highest consumption of alcohol, such as, for example; France, Portugal, Hungary, Denmark, Germany, Austria and SwitzerŽ . land Castillejo and Mercade, 2000 . Simanowski et ́ Ž . al. 1995 described and explained the effect of alcohol on colorectal cell regeneration as a possible mechanism of alcohol-associated carcinogenesis. Alcohol was found to be both an independent and a tobacco-interactive risk factor, influencing the canŽ cer incidence for the colorectum Chhabra et al., 1996; World Cancer Research Fund and American Institute for Cancer Research, 1997; World Cancer . Research Fund, 1998 . Based on these findings, we would like to raise concerns about the rising incidence of colorectal cancer in Europe among both men and women, and the evidence regarding the carcinogenic effects of alcohol drinking and smoking. Finally, we acknowledge such well-designed eco-","PeriodicalId":11950,"journal":{"name":"European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aetiology of sex differences in colorectal cancer.\",\"authors\":\"M. Allam, R. A. Lucena\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/00008469-200106000-00016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aetiology of sex differences in colorectal cancer Ž is controversial. Fernandez et al. European Journal ́ . of Cancer Pre ention 9: 99 104, 2000 explained favourable trends for women analysing colorectal mortality sex ratio trends in major European countries over the last four decades. Their conclusions were based on the protective effect of female hormones, including replacement therapy and oral conŽ . traceptives. McMichael and Potter 1980 raised this hypothesis for the first time after narrative review Ž . study. Meanwhile, MacLennan et al. 1995 reported no association after their meta-analysis study. We think that this protective effect could be excluded on seeing the colorectal cancer mortality rates among women during the last 40 years. It is obvious that in Ž nearly all Northern countries Sweden, Switzerland, UK, Scotland, Austria, Belgium, The Netherlands . and Norway , in spite of lowering use of oral contraŽ . ceptives IARC, 1999 , these rates are decreasing. In general, the colorectal cancer mortality rate among females in nearly all Northern countries is falling compared with the increase in all Southern countries. Perhaps these contradictions come from other unconsidered risk factors, which must be taken into account. Sex-specific mortalities could be an explanation for the favourable trends for women in colorectal cancer. According to WHO, among males in the age group 35 39 years suicide is the principal cause of mortality, and between 40 and 64 years acute myocardial infarction, leaving the field open for different types of cancer, such as lung cancer and colorectal cancer. For women between 35 and 64 years breast cancer is the principal cause of mortality, leaving a small percentage of women vulnerable for colorectal Ž cancer Anuario de la Sanidad y del Medicamento . en Espana, 2000 . Moreover, breast cancer, the most ̃ frequent malignancy among females with rising incidence in all European countries over the last 50 years, represents the majority of female proportional Ž mortality attributed to cancer Boring et al., 1993; . Morillo et al., 2000 . These point at selective mortality among females by breast cancer, a cancer known to be more frequent among females using exogenous Ž . hormones Kelsey and Bernstein, 1996 . The possible carcinogenic role of smoking in colorectal cancer is a cause for concern. Many previous Ž studies Potter, 1996; Tulinius et al., 1997; World Cancer Research Fund and American Institute for . Cancer Research, 1997; Slattery et al., 1998 have considered smoking as a possible risk factor for colorectal cancer, especially rectal cancer. Smoking is well known to be more prevalent among males than females. In Spain, the male to female ratio of smoking in the population older than 15 years is 1.7, a ratio that coincides with that recorded for colorecŽ tal cancer mortality rate Castillejo and Mercade,́ . 2000 . We agree with Fernandez et al. in singling out ́ alcohol drinking as a possible risk factor for colorectal cancer. For example, Hungary in 1994, where the Ž alcohol consumption was quite high 10.2 litres of . pure alcohol per person yearly , had the highest age-standardized mortality rate both for men and women. In general, countries with high colorectal cancer mortality rates, especially from 1990 to 1994, are the countries with the highest consumption of alcohol, such as, for example; France, Portugal, Hungary, Denmark, Germany, Austria and SwitzerŽ . land Castillejo and Mercade, 2000 . Simanowski et ́ Ž . al. 1995 described and explained the effect of alcohol on colorectal cell regeneration as a possible mechanism of alcohol-associated carcinogenesis. Alcohol was found to be both an independent and a tobacco-interactive risk factor, influencing the canŽ cer incidence for the colorectum Chhabra et al., 1996; World Cancer Research Fund and American Institute for Cancer Research, 1997; World Cancer . Research Fund, 1998 . Based on these findings, we would like to raise concerns about the rising incidence of colorectal cancer in Europe among both men and women, and the evidence regarding the carcinogenic effects of alcohol drinking and smoking. Finally, we acknowledge such well-designed eco-\",\"PeriodicalId\":11950,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/00008469-200106000-00016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00008469-200106000-00016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

结直肠癌性别差异的病因学Ž是有争议的。Fernandez等人。《欧洲杂志》。《癌症预防》(2000年9月9日)解释了对妇女有利的趋势,分析了过去四十年来主要欧洲国家结肠直肠癌死亡率的性别比例趋势。他们的结论是基于女性荷尔蒙的保护作用,包括替代疗法和口服conŽ。traceptives。McMichael and Potter 1980在叙述回顾后首次提出了这一假设Ž。研究。与此同时,MacLennan et al. 1995在他们的荟萃分析研究后报告没有关联。我们认为,这种保护作用可以排除在过去40年女性结直肠癌死亡率之外。很明显,在Ž几乎所有的北方国家瑞典,瑞士,英国,苏格兰,奥地利,比利时,荷兰。挪威,尽管口服contraŽ的使用减少了。根据国际癌症研究机构,1999年,这些比率正在下降。总的来说,几乎所有北方国家的女性结直肠癌死亡率都在下降,而所有南方国家的死亡率都在上升。也许这些矛盾来自其他未被考虑的风险因素,这些因素必须考虑在内。性别特异性死亡率可能是女性患结直肠癌的有利趋势的一个解释。根据世界卫生组织的数据,在35至39岁年龄组的男性中,自杀是死亡的主要原因,在40至64岁年龄组的男性中,急性心肌梗死是死亡的主要原因,这为肺癌和结直肠癌等不同类型的癌症留下了空间。对于35岁至64岁的妇女来说,乳腺癌是死亡的主要原因,使一小部分妇女易患结直肠癌Ž。西班牙,2000年。此外,乳腺癌是女性中最常见的恶性肿瘤,在过去50年中,所有欧洲国家的发病率都在上升,占女性因癌症造成的比例死亡率Ž的大部分(Boring等,1993);. Morillo et al., 2000。这些都指向女性乳腺癌的选择性死亡率,一种已知在使用外源性Ž的女性中更常见的癌症。Kelsey and Bernstein, 1996。吸烟在结直肠癌中可能的致癌作用是一个值得关注的问题。许多先前的Ž研究Potter, 1996;Tulinius et al., 1997;世界癌症研究基金会和美国癌症研究所。癌症研究,1997;Slattery等人(1998)认为吸烟可能是结直肠癌,尤其是直肠癌的危险因素。众所周知,吸烟在男性中比女性更普遍。在西班牙,15岁以上人口中吸烟的男女比例为1.7,这一比例与colorecŽ卡斯蒂列霍和梅尔凯德的癌症死亡率记录相吻合。2000年。我们同意Fernandez等人将饮酒作为结直肠癌可能的危险因素的观点。例如,匈牙利1994年的Ž酒精消费量相当高,10.2升。每年人均纯酒精对男性和女性的年龄标准化死亡率最高。一般来说,结直肠癌死亡率高的国家,特别是1990年至1994年期间,是酒精消费量最高的国家,例如:法国、葡萄牙、匈牙利、丹麦、德国、奥地利和SwitzerŽ。卡斯蒂列霍和梅卡德,2000年。Simanowski et´Ž。Al . 1995描述并解释了酒精对结直肠细胞再生的影响是酒精相关癌变的可能机制。研究发现,酒精既是一个独立的风险因素,也是一个与烟草相互作用的风险因素,影响结直肠canŽ癌症发病率Chhabra等人,1996;世界癌症研究基金会和美国癌症研究所,1997年;世界癌症。研究基金,1998年。基于这些发现,我们希望引起人们对欧洲男性和女性结直肠癌发病率上升的关注,以及有关饮酒和吸烟致癌作用的证据。最后,我们感谢这种精心设计的生态系统
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Aetiology of sex differences in colorectal cancer.
The aetiology of sex differences in colorectal cancer Ž is controversial. Fernandez et al. European Journal ́ . of Cancer Pre ention 9: 99 104, 2000 explained favourable trends for women analysing colorectal mortality sex ratio trends in major European countries over the last four decades. Their conclusions were based on the protective effect of female hormones, including replacement therapy and oral conŽ . traceptives. McMichael and Potter 1980 raised this hypothesis for the first time after narrative review Ž . study. Meanwhile, MacLennan et al. 1995 reported no association after their meta-analysis study. We think that this protective effect could be excluded on seeing the colorectal cancer mortality rates among women during the last 40 years. It is obvious that in Ž nearly all Northern countries Sweden, Switzerland, UK, Scotland, Austria, Belgium, The Netherlands . and Norway , in spite of lowering use of oral contraŽ . ceptives IARC, 1999 , these rates are decreasing. In general, the colorectal cancer mortality rate among females in nearly all Northern countries is falling compared with the increase in all Southern countries. Perhaps these contradictions come from other unconsidered risk factors, which must be taken into account. Sex-specific mortalities could be an explanation for the favourable trends for women in colorectal cancer. According to WHO, among males in the age group 35 39 years suicide is the principal cause of mortality, and between 40 and 64 years acute myocardial infarction, leaving the field open for different types of cancer, such as lung cancer and colorectal cancer. For women between 35 and 64 years breast cancer is the principal cause of mortality, leaving a small percentage of women vulnerable for colorectal Ž cancer Anuario de la Sanidad y del Medicamento . en Espana, 2000 . Moreover, breast cancer, the most ̃ frequent malignancy among females with rising incidence in all European countries over the last 50 years, represents the majority of female proportional Ž mortality attributed to cancer Boring et al., 1993; . Morillo et al., 2000 . These point at selective mortality among females by breast cancer, a cancer known to be more frequent among females using exogenous Ž . hormones Kelsey and Bernstein, 1996 . The possible carcinogenic role of smoking in colorectal cancer is a cause for concern. Many previous Ž studies Potter, 1996; Tulinius et al., 1997; World Cancer Research Fund and American Institute for . Cancer Research, 1997; Slattery et al., 1998 have considered smoking as a possible risk factor for colorectal cancer, especially rectal cancer. Smoking is well known to be more prevalent among males than females. In Spain, the male to female ratio of smoking in the population older than 15 years is 1.7, a ratio that coincides with that recorded for colorecŽ tal cancer mortality rate Castillejo and Mercade,́ . 2000 . We agree with Fernandez et al. in singling out ́ alcohol drinking as a possible risk factor for colorectal cancer. For example, Hungary in 1994, where the Ž alcohol consumption was quite high 10.2 litres of . pure alcohol per person yearly , had the highest age-standardized mortality rate both for men and women. In general, countries with high colorectal cancer mortality rates, especially from 1990 to 1994, are the countries with the highest consumption of alcohol, such as, for example; France, Portugal, Hungary, Denmark, Germany, Austria and SwitzerŽ . land Castillejo and Mercade, 2000 . Simanowski et ́ Ž . al. 1995 described and explained the effect of alcohol on colorectal cell regeneration as a possible mechanism of alcohol-associated carcinogenesis. Alcohol was found to be both an independent and a tobacco-interactive risk factor, influencing the canŽ cer incidence for the colorectum Chhabra et al., 1996; World Cancer Research Fund and American Institute for Cancer Research, 1997; World Cancer . Research Fund, 1998 . Based on these findings, we would like to raise concerns about the rising incidence of colorectal cancer in Europe among both men and women, and the evidence regarding the carcinogenic effects of alcohol drinking and smoking. Finally, we acknowledge such well-designed eco-
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The PROPHET project paves the way for personalized prevention in the future healthcare. Prostate cancer burden in major BRICS countries, 1990-2019: findings from the 2019 global burden of disease study. Cancer mortality predictions for 2024 in selected Asian countries and Australia with focus on stomach cancer. Non-contrast MRI and post-mastectomy silicone breast implant rupture: preventing false positive diagnoses. Comment to: Inequalities in adherence to cervical cancer screening in Portugal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1