欧盟法律中的国家垄断和商品自由流动:超越模糊的清晰度

G. Butler
{"title":"欧盟法律中的国家垄断和商品自由流动:超越模糊的清晰度","authors":"G. Butler","doi":"10.54648/leie2021020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The special provision relating to state monopolies of a commercial character within the EU’s internal market is nestled in the Treaties as the final provision regarding the free movement of goods. This special provision of Article 37 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) is often overlooked, given it is seen to be of lesser significance than the general provisions on goods concerning quantitative restrictions and measures having equivalent effect contained in Articles 34– 36 TFEU. Whilst the case law on state monopolies in respect of goods is elaborate, it is still far from clear how state monopolies within the meaning of Article 37 TFEU are to be handled, as evident from the case law of the Court of Justice. The article analyses three arising issues. Firstly, it investigates the boundary between the special provision of Article 37 TFEU and the general provisions of Articles 34–36 TFEU; secondly, it critiques the public interest aim that was once read into Article 37 TFEU by the Court of Justice; and thirdly, it questions the discrimination reading of Article 37 TFEU, rather than a more elaborate restrictions reading. Conclusively, the article offers grounds for why the special provision of Article 37 TFEU ought to be repealed, which in turn, would provide for a more concerted and consistent approach by subjecting state monopolies to the general free movement of goods provisions of the EU Treaties.\nState monopolies, Free movement of goods, State-owned enterprises, European Union law, Law of the internal market","PeriodicalId":42718,"journal":{"name":"Legal Issues of Economic Integration","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"State Monopolies and the Free Movement of Goods in EU Law: Getting Beyond Obscure Clarity\",\"authors\":\"G. Butler\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/leie2021020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The special provision relating to state monopolies of a commercial character within the EU’s internal market is nestled in the Treaties as the final provision regarding the free movement of goods. This special provision of Article 37 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) is often overlooked, given it is seen to be of lesser significance than the general provisions on goods concerning quantitative restrictions and measures having equivalent effect contained in Articles 34– 36 TFEU. Whilst the case law on state monopolies in respect of goods is elaborate, it is still far from clear how state monopolies within the meaning of Article 37 TFEU are to be handled, as evident from the case law of the Court of Justice. The article analyses three arising issues. Firstly, it investigates the boundary between the special provision of Article 37 TFEU and the general provisions of Articles 34–36 TFEU; secondly, it critiques the public interest aim that was once read into Article 37 TFEU by the Court of Justice; and thirdly, it questions the discrimination reading of Article 37 TFEU, rather than a more elaborate restrictions reading. Conclusively, the article offers grounds for why the special provision of Article 37 TFEU ought to be repealed, which in turn, would provide for a more concerted and consistent approach by subjecting state monopolies to the general free movement of goods provisions of the EU Treaties.\\nState monopolies, Free movement of goods, State-owned enterprises, European Union law, Law of the internal market\",\"PeriodicalId\":42718,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Legal Issues of Economic Integration\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Legal Issues of Economic Integration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/leie2021020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal Issues of Economic Integration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/leie2021020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有关欧盟内部市场中具有商业性质的国家垄断的特别条款,作为有关货物自由流动的最后条款,在《条约》中得到了体现。《欧洲联盟运作条约》(《欧洲联盟运作条约》)第37条的这一特别规定经常被忽视,因为人们认为它的重要性不如《欧洲联盟运作条约》第34 - 36条所载关于货物的数量限制和具有同等效果的措施的一般规定。虽然关于货物方面的国家垄断的判例法是详细的,但从法院的判例法中可以看出,如何处理TFEU第37条意义上的国家垄断还远不清楚。本文分析了三个新出现的问题。首先,考察了《劳动合同法》第37条的特殊规定与第34-36条的一般规定之间的界限;其次,它批判了法院曾在TFEU第37条中解读的公共利益目标;第三,它质疑第37条的歧视性解读,而不是更详细的限制性解读。最后,该条款提供了为什么TFEU第37条的特殊条款应该被废除的理由,反过来,这将提供一个更协调一致的方法,通过使国家垄断服从欧盟条约的一般货物自由流动条款。国家垄断,商品自由流动,国有企业,欧盟法,内部市场法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
State Monopolies and the Free Movement of Goods in EU Law: Getting Beyond Obscure Clarity
The special provision relating to state monopolies of a commercial character within the EU’s internal market is nestled in the Treaties as the final provision regarding the free movement of goods. This special provision of Article 37 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) is often overlooked, given it is seen to be of lesser significance than the general provisions on goods concerning quantitative restrictions and measures having equivalent effect contained in Articles 34– 36 TFEU. Whilst the case law on state monopolies in respect of goods is elaborate, it is still far from clear how state monopolies within the meaning of Article 37 TFEU are to be handled, as evident from the case law of the Court of Justice. The article analyses three arising issues. Firstly, it investigates the boundary between the special provision of Article 37 TFEU and the general provisions of Articles 34–36 TFEU; secondly, it critiques the public interest aim that was once read into Article 37 TFEU by the Court of Justice; and thirdly, it questions the discrimination reading of Article 37 TFEU, rather than a more elaborate restrictions reading. Conclusively, the article offers grounds for why the special provision of Article 37 TFEU ought to be repealed, which in turn, would provide for a more concerted and consistent approach by subjecting state monopolies to the general free movement of goods provisions of the EU Treaties. State monopolies, Free movement of goods, State-owned enterprises, European Union law, Law of the internal market
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊最新文献
The EU’s Anti-coercion Instrument: A Return of Unlawful Unilateral Trade Countermeasures in Disguise? Editorial: Investment Protection in an Integrated Europe – The Non-Enforcement of Intra-EU Investment Arbitration Awards as the Ultimate Test Case for Strasbourg’s Deference Doctrines Why Do (High-Income) Countries Wish to Green Their Trade Agreements? The Application of Regulation 452/2019 in Response to Chinese Foreign Direct Investment The ESM Reform and Its Missing Legitimacy in Non-Euro Area Member States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1