教师专业发展的设计与教师学习课堂话语有何关系?一项为期一年的干预研究的结果

IF 1.6 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Education for Teaching Pub Date : 2022-12-02 DOI:10.1080/02607476.2022.2152315
Dennis Hauk, A. Gröschner, M. Weil, R. Böheim, Ann-Kathrin Schindler, M. Alles, T. Seidel
{"title":"教师专业发展的设计与教师学习课堂话语有何关系?一项为期一年的干预研究的结果","authors":"Dennis Hauk, A. Gröschner, M. Weil, R. Böheim, Ann-Kathrin Schindler, M. Alles, T. Seidel","doi":"10.1080/02607476.2022.2152315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Promoting teachers to lead classroom discourse effectively is a relevant topic for teacher professional development worldwide. This study compares the impacts of two teacher professional development programmes that aim to support teachers in their classroom discourse practices. In one programme, an adaptive and practitioner-led approach was applied, while in the other programme, a more specified and direct instructional approach was implemented. In a one-year intervention study, we investigated how both designs affected teacher knowledge about classroom discourse and teacher beliefs. Both programmes were filmed, and the implementation of their design features was video-analysed. The effects on teacher knowledge and beliefs were measured via self-reporting and a knowledge test. The results show no differences in teachers’ knowledge acquisition over time. However, the adaptive-to-practice programme was significantly more successful in affecting teacher beliefs. The findings are discussed in light of further research and practical implications for teacher professional development.","PeriodicalId":47457,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education for Teaching","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How is the design of teacher professional development related to teacher learning about classroom discourse? Findings from a one-year intervention study\",\"authors\":\"Dennis Hauk, A. Gröschner, M. Weil, R. Böheim, Ann-Kathrin Schindler, M. Alles, T. Seidel\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02607476.2022.2152315\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Promoting teachers to lead classroom discourse effectively is a relevant topic for teacher professional development worldwide. This study compares the impacts of two teacher professional development programmes that aim to support teachers in their classroom discourse practices. In one programme, an adaptive and practitioner-led approach was applied, while in the other programme, a more specified and direct instructional approach was implemented. In a one-year intervention study, we investigated how both designs affected teacher knowledge about classroom discourse and teacher beliefs. Both programmes were filmed, and the implementation of their design features was video-analysed. The effects on teacher knowledge and beliefs were measured via self-reporting and a knowledge test. The results show no differences in teachers’ knowledge acquisition over time. However, the adaptive-to-practice programme was significantly more successful in affecting teacher beliefs. The findings are discussed in light of further research and practical implications for teacher professional development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Education for Teaching\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Education for Teaching\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2022.2152315\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education for Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2022.2152315","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How is the design of teacher professional development related to teacher learning about classroom discourse? Findings from a one-year intervention study
ABSTRACT Promoting teachers to lead classroom discourse effectively is a relevant topic for teacher professional development worldwide. This study compares the impacts of two teacher professional development programmes that aim to support teachers in their classroom discourse practices. In one programme, an adaptive and practitioner-led approach was applied, while in the other programme, a more specified and direct instructional approach was implemented. In a one-year intervention study, we investigated how both designs affected teacher knowledge about classroom discourse and teacher beliefs. Both programmes were filmed, and the implementation of their design features was video-analysed. The effects on teacher knowledge and beliefs were measured via self-reporting and a knowledge test. The results show no differences in teachers’ knowledge acquisition over time. However, the adaptive-to-practice programme was significantly more successful in affecting teacher beliefs. The findings are discussed in light of further research and practical implications for teacher professional development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Education for Teaching
Journal of Education for Teaching EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: The Journal of Education for Teaching is an established international refereed periodical which publishes original contributions on the subject of teacher education. The journal interprets "teacher education" in the widest sense, to include initial training, in-service education and staff development. The editors welcome scholarly discussions of new issues, reports of research projects or surveys of research work in particular fields, and contributions to current debates in teacher education throughout the world, generally or on specific issues.
期刊最新文献
‘It’s like Central Park’: conceptualising teacher residencies as a democratic hub Can school placement foster professional identity formation? A multiple case study Rupture as generative of professional agency: narratives from student teachers on placement during school closures The role of emotional tensions in English language student teachers’ identity construction: an activity theory perspective Evaluating the implementation of curriculum reform: the perspectives of Welsh teachers navigating the new health and wellbeing area of learning experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1