体积吸收微采样(VAMS)与高分辨率、精确质量(HRAM)质谱联用,作为一种简化的替代干血点(DBS)分析的心血管药物治疗药物监测方法

IF 2.1 Q4 Chemistry Clinical Mass Spectrometry Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.clinms.2018.08.002
Sangeeta Tanna, Ahmed Alalaqi, Dennis Bernieh, Graham Lawson
{"title":"体积吸收微采样(VAMS)与高分辨率、精确质量(HRAM)质谱联用,作为一种简化的替代干血点(DBS)分析的心血管药物治疗药物监测方法","authors":"Sangeeta Tanna,&nbsp;Ahmed Alalaqi,&nbsp;Dennis Bernieh,&nbsp;Graham Lawson","doi":"10.1016/j.clinms.2018.08.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Here, volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS), used for the measurement of cardiovascular drugs, is compared against conventional dried blood spot (DBS) card sampling to evaluate adherence to prescribed medication. Volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) is an attractive alternative to plasma sampling for routine drug monitoring and potentially overcomes haematocrit issues associated with quantitative bioanalysis of conventional dried blood spots. A quantitative VAMS-based LC-HRAM MS assay for atenolol, lisinopril, simvastatin and valsartan was developed and validated. The assay demonstrated acceptable linearity, selectivity, accuracy, precision, recovery and insignificant matrix effects with no impact of haematocrit on assay accuracy. Volunteers provided both VAMS and DBS 903 card samples (the current standard) to allow comparison of the two methods and demonstrate the potential utility of VAMS. Analysis of VAMS samples correctly identified drugs in volunteers known to be adherent, and found no false positives from volunteers known to be taking no medication. There was a strong correlation between the two sampling systems confirming the utility of VAMS. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) can assist clinicians in deciding how to proceed with treatment in the event of poor improvement in patient health. VAMS could offer a potentially more efficient method of sample collection, with fewer rejected samples than the DBS approach.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48565,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Mass Spectrometry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.clinms.2018.08.002","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) coupled with high-resolution, accurate-mass (HRAM) mass spectrometry as a simplified alternative to dried blood spot (DBS) analysis for therapeutic drug monitoring of cardiovascular drugs\",\"authors\":\"Sangeeta Tanna,&nbsp;Ahmed Alalaqi,&nbsp;Dennis Bernieh,&nbsp;Graham Lawson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clinms.2018.08.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Here, volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS), used for the measurement of cardiovascular drugs, is compared against conventional dried blood spot (DBS) card sampling to evaluate adherence to prescribed medication. Volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) is an attractive alternative to plasma sampling for routine drug monitoring and potentially overcomes haematocrit issues associated with quantitative bioanalysis of conventional dried blood spots. A quantitative VAMS-based LC-HRAM MS assay for atenolol, lisinopril, simvastatin and valsartan was developed and validated. The assay demonstrated acceptable linearity, selectivity, accuracy, precision, recovery and insignificant matrix effects with no impact of haematocrit on assay accuracy. Volunteers provided both VAMS and DBS 903 card samples (the current standard) to allow comparison of the two methods and demonstrate the potential utility of VAMS. Analysis of VAMS samples correctly identified drugs in volunteers known to be adherent, and found no false positives from volunteers known to be taking no medication. There was a strong correlation between the two sampling systems confirming the utility of VAMS. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) can assist clinicians in deciding how to proceed with treatment in the event of poor improvement in patient health. VAMS could offer a potentially more efficient method of sample collection, with fewer rejected samples than the DBS approach.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48565,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Mass Spectrometry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.clinms.2018.08.002\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Mass Spectrometry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2376999818300072\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Chemistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Mass Spectrometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2376999818300072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Chemistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

在这里,用于测量心血管药物的体积吸收微采样(VAMS)与传统的干血点(DBS)卡采样进行比较,以评估处方药物的依从性。体积吸收微采样(VAMS)是常规药物监测中血浆采样的一种有吸引力的替代方法,并且有可能克服与传统干血点定量生物分析相关的红细胞压积问题。建立并验证了基于vams的阿替洛尔、赖诺普利、辛伐他汀和缬沙坦的LC-HRAM质谱定量分析方法。该分析具有可接受的线性、选择性、准确性、精密度、回收率和不显著的基质效应,红细胞压积对分析准确性没有影响。志愿者提供了VAMS和DBS 903卡片样本(当前标准),以便对两种方法进行比较,并展示VAMS的潜在效用。对VAMS样本的分析正确地识别了已知黏附的志愿者的药物,并且没有发现已知未服用药物的志愿者的假阳性。两种抽样系统之间有很强的相关性,证实了VAMS的效用。治疗药物监测(TDM)可以帮助临床医生在患者健康状况改善不佳的情况下决定如何进行治疗。VAMS可以提供一种潜在的更有效的样本收集方法,比DBS方法有更少的拒绝样本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) coupled with high-resolution, accurate-mass (HRAM) mass spectrometry as a simplified alternative to dried blood spot (DBS) analysis for therapeutic drug monitoring of cardiovascular drugs

Here, volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS), used for the measurement of cardiovascular drugs, is compared against conventional dried blood spot (DBS) card sampling to evaluate adherence to prescribed medication. Volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) is an attractive alternative to plasma sampling for routine drug monitoring and potentially overcomes haematocrit issues associated with quantitative bioanalysis of conventional dried blood spots. A quantitative VAMS-based LC-HRAM MS assay for atenolol, lisinopril, simvastatin and valsartan was developed and validated. The assay demonstrated acceptable linearity, selectivity, accuracy, precision, recovery and insignificant matrix effects with no impact of haematocrit on assay accuracy. Volunteers provided both VAMS and DBS 903 card samples (the current standard) to allow comparison of the two methods and demonstrate the potential utility of VAMS. Analysis of VAMS samples correctly identified drugs in volunteers known to be adherent, and found no false positives from volunteers known to be taking no medication. There was a strong correlation between the two sampling systems confirming the utility of VAMS. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) can assist clinicians in deciding how to proceed with treatment in the event of poor improvement in patient health. VAMS could offer a potentially more efficient method of sample collection, with fewer rejected samples than the DBS approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Mass Spectrometry
Clinical Mass Spectrometry Chemistry-Spectroscopy
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Clinical Mass Spectrometry publishes peer-reviewed articles addressing the application of mass spectrometric technologies in Laboratory Medicine and Clinical Pathology with the focus on diagnostic applications. It is the first journal dedicated specifically to the application of mass spectrometry and related techniques in the context of diagnostic procedures in medicine. The journal has an interdisciplinary approach aiming to link clinical, biochemical and technological issues and results.
期刊最新文献
Mass spectrometry in clinical glycomics: The path from biomarker identification to clinical implementation A proposal for score assignment to characterize biological processes from mass spectral analysis of serum Analysis of urinary VOCs using mass spectrometric methods to diagnose cancer: A review Analysis of 17 fentanyls in plasma and blood by UPLC-MS/MS with interpretation of findings in surgical and postmortem casework Collision energy-breakdown curves – An additional tool to characterize MS/MS methods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1