{"title":"基于性别的职业隔离的五十年回顾:对有影响力的作者、机构和研究集群的文献计量学研究","authors":"Leena Sachdeva, Kumkum Bharti, M. Maheshwari","doi":"10.1177/10384162211006951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the proliferation of occupational segregation research, only a limited amount has explored it from a gender perspective. The attention that has been given is widely scattered and requires an analysis to identify the major works undertaken and the changes over time. This study aimed to examine and assimilate articles published on gender-based occupational segregation through a bibliometric analysis. The study examined 512 articles published from the early 1970s to 2020 that were retrieved from the Web of Science database. The findings suggest that gender and occupational segregation remain an extensive field of research, although this research comes mainly from North American and European countries. The low representation from developing countries indicates that more research is needed based on these different socio-cultural settings. This study identified three dominant research clusters, namely gendered organisational structures and systems, measurement of occupational segregation, and wage differential. Studies also covered areas including conceptualization, LGBTQ issues, and the role of legislation and institutions in reducing workplace inequalities; thus, providing a direction for scholars and practitioners.","PeriodicalId":44843,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Career Development","volume":"246 1","pages":"117 - 128"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A five-decade review of gender-based occupational segregation: A bibliometric study of influential authors, institutions, and research clusters\",\"authors\":\"Leena Sachdeva, Kumkum Bharti, M. Maheshwari\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10384162211006951\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite the proliferation of occupational segregation research, only a limited amount has explored it from a gender perspective. The attention that has been given is widely scattered and requires an analysis to identify the major works undertaken and the changes over time. This study aimed to examine and assimilate articles published on gender-based occupational segregation through a bibliometric analysis. The study examined 512 articles published from the early 1970s to 2020 that were retrieved from the Web of Science database. The findings suggest that gender and occupational segregation remain an extensive field of research, although this research comes mainly from North American and European countries. The low representation from developing countries indicates that more research is needed based on these different socio-cultural settings. This study identified three dominant research clusters, namely gendered organisational structures and systems, measurement of occupational segregation, and wage differential. Studies also covered areas including conceptualization, LGBTQ issues, and the role of legislation and institutions in reducing workplace inequalities; thus, providing a direction for scholars and practitioners.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44843,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Career Development\",\"volume\":\"246 1\",\"pages\":\"117 - 128\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Career Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10384162211006951\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Career Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10384162211006951","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
尽管对职业隔离的研究越来越多,但从性别角度对其进行探讨的数量有限。所给予的注意很分散,需要进行分析,以确定所进行的主要工作和随着时间的推移所发生的变化。本研究旨在透过文献计量分析,检视并吸收有关性别职业隔离的文章。该研究调查了从20世纪70年代初到2020年发表的512篇文章,这些文章是从Web of Science数据库中检索出来的。研究结果表明,性别和职业隔离仍然是一个广泛的研究领域,尽管这项研究主要来自北美和欧洲国家。来自发展中国家的低比例表明需要基于这些不同的社会文化背景进行更多的研究。本研究确定了三个主要的研究集群,即性别组织结构和系统、职业隔离测量和工资差异。研究还涵盖了概念化、LGBTQ问题以及立法和制度在减少工作场所不平等方面的作用等领域;从而为学者和实践者提供一个方向。
A five-decade review of gender-based occupational segregation: A bibliometric study of influential authors, institutions, and research clusters
Despite the proliferation of occupational segregation research, only a limited amount has explored it from a gender perspective. The attention that has been given is widely scattered and requires an analysis to identify the major works undertaken and the changes over time. This study aimed to examine and assimilate articles published on gender-based occupational segregation through a bibliometric analysis. The study examined 512 articles published from the early 1970s to 2020 that were retrieved from the Web of Science database. The findings suggest that gender and occupational segregation remain an extensive field of research, although this research comes mainly from North American and European countries. The low representation from developing countries indicates that more research is needed based on these different socio-cultural settings. This study identified three dominant research clusters, namely gendered organisational structures and systems, measurement of occupational segregation, and wage differential. Studies also covered areas including conceptualization, LGBTQ issues, and the role of legislation and institutions in reducing workplace inequalities; thus, providing a direction for scholars and practitioners.