评论Jussi M. Hanhimäki,跨大西洋和平和M.E. Sarotte,《寸草不动》

IF 1.3 2区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Journal of Strategic Studies Pub Date : 2023-01-24 DOI:10.1080/01402390.2022.2164569
S. Colbourn
{"title":"评论Jussi M. Hanhimäki,跨大西洋和平和M.E. Sarotte,《寸草不动》","authors":"S. Colbourn","doi":"10.1080/01402390.2022.2164569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The post – Cold War world, it seems, is history. Perhaps the shocks of recent years, be it COVID-19 or Russia’s vastly expanded war in Ukraine, signal the end of an era begun with the revolutions of 1989. Certainly, plenty of pundits seem to think so. But the contours of the post – Cold War world are also increasingly terrain that historians feel comfortable traversing. Both Mary Sarotte and Jussi Hanhimäki have recently taken up that task with two new histories of the post – Cold War order in the Euro-Atlantic region. In Pax Transatlantica, Hanhimäki emphasizes a fundamental continuity as he surveys transatlantic relations from the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 through the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic that brought the globe to a virtual standstill in 2020. That sense of continuity is clear from the first pages, which open with a game likely familiar to anyone who has taught course on transatlantic relations – date the citation. Usually, it goes something like this: After being offered up a quotation lamenting the profound divergence between the United States and Europe, players guess when the remark dates from. A slew of responses follow: 2020, 2017, 2003, and the list goes on. Of course, the reason the game works so well is that all the guesses are smart and well-informed, but also wrong. Hanhimäki’s opening example comes from 1973, but the same script works with any number of examples.","PeriodicalId":47240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strategic Studies","volume":"23 1","pages":"1103 - 1106"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review of Jussi M. Hanhimäki, Pax Transatlantica and M.E. Sarotte, Not One Inch\",\"authors\":\"S. Colbourn\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01402390.2022.2164569\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The post – Cold War world, it seems, is history. Perhaps the shocks of recent years, be it COVID-19 or Russia’s vastly expanded war in Ukraine, signal the end of an era begun with the revolutions of 1989. Certainly, plenty of pundits seem to think so. But the contours of the post – Cold War world are also increasingly terrain that historians feel comfortable traversing. Both Mary Sarotte and Jussi Hanhimäki have recently taken up that task with two new histories of the post – Cold War order in the Euro-Atlantic region. In Pax Transatlantica, Hanhimäki emphasizes a fundamental continuity as he surveys transatlantic relations from the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 through the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic that brought the globe to a virtual standstill in 2020. That sense of continuity is clear from the first pages, which open with a game likely familiar to anyone who has taught course on transatlantic relations – date the citation. Usually, it goes something like this: After being offered up a quotation lamenting the profound divergence between the United States and Europe, players guess when the remark dates from. A slew of responses follow: 2020, 2017, 2003, and the list goes on. Of course, the reason the game works so well is that all the guesses are smart and well-informed, but also wrong. Hanhimäki’s opening example comes from 1973, but the same script works with any number of examples.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Strategic Studies\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"1103 - 1106\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Strategic Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2022.2164569\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Strategic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2022.2164569","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

冷战后的世界似乎已经成为历史。也许近年来的冲击,无论是新冠疫情还是俄罗斯在乌克兰的大规模战争,都标志着始于1989年革命的一个时代的结束。当然,很多专家似乎都这么认为。但冷战后世界的轮廓也日益成为历史学家们乐于探索的领域。玛丽·萨洛特和尤西Hanhimäki最近都承担了这一任务,撰写了两本关于后冷战时期欧洲-大西洋地区秩序的新历史。在《跨大西洋的和平》一书中,Hanhimäki强调了跨大西洋关系的基本连续性,他回顾了从1989年柏林墙倒塌到2020年COVID-19大流行早期阶段的跨大西洋关系。这种连续性从书的第一页就很明显了,开篇是一个游戏,任何教过跨大西洋关系课程的人可能都很熟悉——引用日期。通常情况下,游戏是这样的:玩家在听到一段哀叹美国和欧洲之间存在深刻分歧的引语后,猜测这段话是什么时候说的。接下来是一系列的回答:2020年、2017年、2003年,这个名单还在继续。当然,这款游戏之所以如此成功,是因为所有的猜测都是明智且消息灵通的,但同时也是错误的。Hanhimäki开头的例子来自1973年,但同样的脚本适用于任何数量的例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Review of Jussi M. Hanhimäki, Pax Transatlantica and M.E. Sarotte, Not One Inch
The post – Cold War world, it seems, is history. Perhaps the shocks of recent years, be it COVID-19 or Russia’s vastly expanded war in Ukraine, signal the end of an era begun with the revolutions of 1989. Certainly, plenty of pundits seem to think so. But the contours of the post – Cold War world are also increasingly terrain that historians feel comfortable traversing. Both Mary Sarotte and Jussi Hanhimäki have recently taken up that task with two new histories of the post – Cold War order in the Euro-Atlantic region. In Pax Transatlantica, Hanhimäki emphasizes a fundamental continuity as he surveys transatlantic relations from the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 through the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic that brought the globe to a virtual standstill in 2020. That sense of continuity is clear from the first pages, which open with a game likely familiar to anyone who has taught course on transatlantic relations – date the citation. Usually, it goes something like this: After being offered up a quotation lamenting the profound divergence between the United States and Europe, players guess when the remark dates from. A slew of responses follow: 2020, 2017, 2003, and the list goes on. Of course, the reason the game works so well is that all the guesses are smart and well-informed, but also wrong. Hanhimäki’s opening example comes from 1973, but the same script works with any number of examples.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The defining feature of The Journal of Strategic Studies is its commitment to multi-disciplinary approach. The editors welcome articles that challenge our historical understanding of man"s efforts to achieve political ends through the application of military and diplomatic means; articles on contemporary security and theoretical controversies of enduring value; and of course articles that explicitly combine the historical and theoretical approaches to the study of modern warfare, defence policy and modern strategy. In addition to a well-established review section, The Journal of Strategic Studies offers its diverse readership a wide range of "special issues" and "special sections".
期刊最新文献
How dawn turned into dusk: Scoping and closing possible nuclear futures after the Cold War Going nuclear: The development of American strategic conceptions about cyber conflict Aligning tactics with strategy: Vertical implementation of military doctrine How small states break oil sanctions: Israel’s oil import strategy in the 1970s Information security in the space age: Britain’s Skynet satellite communications program and the evolution of modern command and control networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1