T. Černá, K. Michalíková, Jaroslav Semerád, T. Cajthaml
{"title":"雌激素内分泌干扰物的分析测定:污水处理厂流出物的选择方法","authors":"T. Černá, K. Michalíková, Jaroslav Semerád, T. Cajthaml","doi":"10.1071/en21028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Environmental context Endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs) are among the most recently targeted micropollutants detected in wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) effluents and in aquatic environments. There is a need for the development of robust analytical methods for most relevant estrogenic EDCs. This study provides optimisation of analytical techniques and addresses several relevant aspects that are often overlooked in the literature. The method was finally successfully employed for the analysis of WWTP effluents. Abstract Two analytical approaches – liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and gas chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS) methods – were compared for the simultaneous determination of the 19 most important oestrogenic endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs), such as 17β-oestradiol, oestrone, 17α-ethinyloestradiol, bisphenol A and triclosan in wastewater treatment plant effluents. To lower the instrument limits of detection (ILODs), a derivatisation step preceded detection in both methods. The stability, sensitivity and ease of use of dansylation (Dns) for LC-MS/MS and trimethylsilylation (TMS) for GC-MS/MS derivatives were evaluated before method validation. TMS derivatisation products were highly unstable over time. Parameters such as susceptibility to matrix effects and the stability of monodansylated and didansylated derivatisation products of phytohormones are discussed. Lower ILODs of highly potent EDCs (0.11 ng mL−1 for 17β-oestradiol, 0.01 ng mL−1 for 17α-ethinyloestradiol and 0.22 ng mL−1 for oestrone) and stability of derivatisation products within 7 days were achieved using LC–MS/MS; therefore, further validation of this method at environmentally relevant concentrations was conducted. The method limits of detection (MLODs) met the requirements of the European Union defined in Directive 2008/105/ES for 17α-ethinyloestradiol (0.035 ng L−1) and 17β-oestradiol (0.4 ng L−1). Twenty samples of wastewater treatment plant effluent from the Czech Republic were screened using LC-MS/MS. Fifteen of the EDCs were detected in at least one sample. The most abundant EDCs were bisphenol A, with a concentration up to 1107 ng L−1, and triclosan, with a concentration up to 76 ng L−1. No seasonal trend between late spring and autumn samples was observed in the frequency or quantity of analytes.","PeriodicalId":11714,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Chemistry","volume":"81 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analytical determination of oestrogenic endocrine disruptors: the method of choice for wastewater treatment plant effluents\",\"authors\":\"T. Černá, K. Michalíková, Jaroslav Semerád, T. Cajthaml\",\"doi\":\"10.1071/en21028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Environmental context Endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs) are among the most recently targeted micropollutants detected in wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) effluents and in aquatic environments. There is a need for the development of robust analytical methods for most relevant estrogenic EDCs. This study provides optimisation of analytical techniques and addresses several relevant aspects that are often overlooked in the literature. The method was finally successfully employed for the analysis of WWTP effluents. Abstract Two analytical approaches – liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and gas chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS) methods – were compared for the simultaneous determination of the 19 most important oestrogenic endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs), such as 17β-oestradiol, oestrone, 17α-ethinyloestradiol, bisphenol A and triclosan in wastewater treatment plant effluents. To lower the instrument limits of detection (ILODs), a derivatisation step preceded detection in both methods. The stability, sensitivity and ease of use of dansylation (Dns) for LC-MS/MS and trimethylsilylation (TMS) for GC-MS/MS derivatives were evaluated before method validation. TMS derivatisation products were highly unstable over time. Parameters such as susceptibility to matrix effects and the stability of monodansylated and didansylated derivatisation products of phytohormones are discussed. Lower ILODs of highly potent EDCs (0.11 ng mL−1 for 17β-oestradiol, 0.01 ng mL−1 for 17α-ethinyloestradiol and 0.22 ng mL−1 for oestrone) and stability of derivatisation products within 7 days were achieved using LC–MS/MS; therefore, further validation of this method at environmentally relevant concentrations was conducted. The method limits of detection (MLODs) met the requirements of the European Union defined in Directive 2008/105/ES for 17α-ethinyloestradiol (0.035 ng L−1) and 17β-oestradiol (0.4 ng L−1). Twenty samples of wastewater treatment plant effluent from the Czech Republic were screened using LC-MS/MS. Fifteen of the EDCs were detected in at least one sample. The most abundant EDCs were bisphenol A, with a concentration up to 1107 ng L−1, and triclosan, with a concentration up to 76 ng L−1. No seasonal trend between late spring and autumn samples was observed in the frequency or quantity of analytes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11714,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"81 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1071/en21028\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/en21028","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
环境背景内分泌干扰化合物(EDCs)是最近在污水处理厂(WWTP)流出物和水生环境中检测到的目标微污染物之一。有必要为大多数相关的雌激素EDCs开发可靠的分析方法。本研究提供了分析技术的优化,并解决了文献中经常被忽视的几个相关方面。最后将该方法成功应用于污水处理厂污水的分析。摘要比较了液相色谱-串联质谱(LC-MS/MS)和气相色谱-串联质谱(GC-MS/MS)两种分析方法同时测定污水处理厂出水中17β-雌二醇、雌酮、17α-炔雌醇、双酚A和三氯生等19种最重要的雌激素内分泌干扰物质。为了降低仪器检测限(ILODs),两种方法的检测前都有一个衍生化步骤。在方法验证前,对LC-MS/MS的丹基化(Dns)和GC-MS/MS衍生物的三甲基硅基化(TMS)的稳定性、灵敏度和易用性进行了评价。随着时间的推移,TMS衍生产品高度不稳定。讨论了对基质效应的敏感性以及植物激素的单、二丹酰衍生物的稳定性等参数。高效EDCs (17β-雌二醇为0.11 ng mL - 1, 17α-炔雌醇为0.01 ng mL - 1,雌二醇为0.22 ng mL - 1)的ilod较低,衍生产物在7天内稳定;因此,在环境相关浓度下对该方法进行了进一步验证。方法检出限(mlod)符合欧盟指令2008/105/ES对17α-炔雌醇(0.035 ng L−1)和17β-炔雌醇(0.4 ng L−1)的要求。采用LC-MS/MS对来自捷克共和国的20个污水处理厂的废水进行了筛选。在至少一个样本中检测到15种EDCs。EDCs含量最高的是双酚A,浓度高达1107 ng L−1,三氯生浓度高达76 ng L−1。晚春和秋季样品在分析物的频率或数量上没有观察到季节性趋势。
Analytical determination of oestrogenic endocrine disruptors: the method of choice for wastewater treatment plant effluents
Environmental context Endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs) are among the most recently targeted micropollutants detected in wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) effluents and in aquatic environments. There is a need for the development of robust analytical methods for most relevant estrogenic EDCs. This study provides optimisation of analytical techniques and addresses several relevant aspects that are often overlooked in the literature. The method was finally successfully employed for the analysis of WWTP effluents. Abstract Two analytical approaches – liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and gas chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS) methods – were compared for the simultaneous determination of the 19 most important oestrogenic endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs), such as 17β-oestradiol, oestrone, 17α-ethinyloestradiol, bisphenol A and triclosan in wastewater treatment plant effluents. To lower the instrument limits of detection (ILODs), a derivatisation step preceded detection in both methods. The stability, sensitivity and ease of use of dansylation (Dns) for LC-MS/MS and trimethylsilylation (TMS) for GC-MS/MS derivatives were evaluated before method validation. TMS derivatisation products were highly unstable over time. Parameters such as susceptibility to matrix effects and the stability of monodansylated and didansylated derivatisation products of phytohormones are discussed. Lower ILODs of highly potent EDCs (0.11 ng mL−1 for 17β-oestradiol, 0.01 ng mL−1 for 17α-ethinyloestradiol and 0.22 ng mL−1 for oestrone) and stability of derivatisation products within 7 days were achieved using LC–MS/MS; therefore, further validation of this method at environmentally relevant concentrations was conducted. The method limits of detection (MLODs) met the requirements of the European Union defined in Directive 2008/105/ES for 17α-ethinyloestradiol (0.035 ng L−1) and 17β-oestradiol (0.4 ng L−1). Twenty samples of wastewater treatment plant effluent from the Czech Republic were screened using LC-MS/MS. Fifteen of the EDCs were detected in at least one sample. The most abundant EDCs were bisphenol A, with a concentration up to 1107 ng L−1, and triclosan, with a concentration up to 76 ng L−1. No seasonal trend between late spring and autumn samples was observed in the frequency or quantity of analytes.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Chemistry publishes manuscripts addressing the chemistry of the environment (air, water, earth, and biota), including the behaviour and impacts of contaminants and other anthropogenic disturbances. The scope encompasses atmospheric chemistry, geochemistry and biogeochemistry, climate change, marine and freshwater chemistry, polar chemistry, fire chemistry, soil and sediment chemistry, and chemical aspects of ecotoxicology. Papers that take an interdisciplinary approach, while advancing our understanding of the linkages between chemistry and physical or biological processes, are particularly encouraged.
While focusing on the publication of important original research and timely reviews, the journal also publishes essays and opinion pieces on issues of importance to environmental scientists, such as policy and funding.
Papers should be written in a style that is accessible to those outside the field, as the readership will include - in addition to chemists - biologists, toxicologists, soil scientists, and workers from government and industrial institutions. All manuscripts are rigorously peer-reviewed and professionally copy-edited.
Environmental Chemistry is published with the endorsement of the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) and the Australian Academy of Science.