是什么决定了企业的创新?追赶中东欧国家的案例

Michael W. Vavra, Gregor Vohralík, Viktor Prokop, J. Stejskal
{"title":"是什么决定了企业的创新?追赶中东欧国家的案例","authors":"Michael W. Vavra, Gregor Vohralík, Viktor Prokop, J. Stejskal","doi":"10.12776/QIP.V25I1.1513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The purpose of the paper is to recognize significant innovation determinants on firms’ product, process, and overall innovation activity. Methodology/Approach: The source of data for the analysis is the Community Innovation Survey 2012-2014. If the company has implemented the relevant innovation activity, they acquire a value of 1, or, if the company has not performed a certain activity in the period, they reached 0. As the variables are binary, the logistic regression analysis was used. Findings: Based on the results from the analysis, we defined the proper determinants of firms’ innovation activities but unfortunately, firms are not able to achieve innovative outputs, specifically within CEE countries. This is due, among other things, to several factors such as different conditions in individual countries, different innovation policies at the national as well as company level, managerial approach (aversion) to risk, mistrust between the various actors, and many others. A typical example is the impact of internal R&D on firm innovations. While in the case of product innovations we found a significant positive impact, in the case of process innovations the impact was negative Research Limitation/Implication: We performed on outdated data and we did not make a comparison with countries from Western Europe. Originality/Value of paper: The paper analyses innovation determinants and it is importance for innovation activities within the CEE countries. Category: Research paper","PeriodicalId":44057,"journal":{"name":"Quality Innovation Prosperity-Kvalita Inovacia Prosperita","volume":"8 1","pages":"33-54"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Determines Firm’s Innovation? The Case of Catching-up CEE Countries\",\"authors\":\"Michael W. Vavra, Gregor Vohralík, Viktor Prokop, J. Stejskal\",\"doi\":\"10.12776/QIP.V25I1.1513\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: The purpose of the paper is to recognize significant innovation determinants on firms’ product, process, and overall innovation activity. Methodology/Approach: The source of data for the analysis is the Community Innovation Survey 2012-2014. If the company has implemented the relevant innovation activity, they acquire a value of 1, or, if the company has not performed a certain activity in the period, they reached 0. As the variables are binary, the logistic regression analysis was used. Findings: Based on the results from the analysis, we defined the proper determinants of firms’ innovation activities but unfortunately, firms are not able to achieve innovative outputs, specifically within CEE countries. This is due, among other things, to several factors such as different conditions in individual countries, different innovation policies at the national as well as company level, managerial approach (aversion) to risk, mistrust between the various actors, and many others. A typical example is the impact of internal R&D on firm innovations. While in the case of product innovations we found a significant positive impact, in the case of process innovations the impact was negative Research Limitation/Implication: We performed on outdated data and we did not make a comparison with countries from Western Europe. Originality/Value of paper: The paper analyses innovation determinants and it is importance for innovation activities within the CEE countries. Category: Research paper\",\"PeriodicalId\":44057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quality Innovation Prosperity-Kvalita Inovacia Prosperita\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"33-54\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quality Innovation Prosperity-Kvalita Inovacia Prosperita\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12776/QIP.V25I1.1513\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality Innovation Prosperity-Kvalita Inovacia Prosperita","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12776/QIP.V25I1.1513","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本文的目的是认识到企业的产品,过程和整体创新活动的重大创新决定因素。方法/方法:分析数据来源于2012-2014年社区创新调查。如果公司已经实施了相关的创新活动,它们的值为1,或者,如果公司在此期间没有进行某项活动,它们的值为0。由于变量为二元,故采用logistic回归分析。结果:根据分析结果,我们定义了企业创新活动的适当决定因素,但不幸的是,企业无法实现创新产出,特别是在中东欧国家。除其他因素外,这是由于几个因素造成的,例如个别国家的不同条件,国家和公司层面的不同创新政策,对风险的管理方法(厌恶),不同参与者之间的不信任等等。一个典型的例子是内部研发对企业创新的影响。虽然在产品创新的情况下,我们发现了显著的积极影响,但在工艺创新的情况下,影响是消极的研究限制/含义:我们对过时的数据进行了执行,我们没有与西欧国家进行比较。论文的原创性/价值:本文分析了创新的决定因素及其对中东欧国家创新活动的重要性。类别:研究论文
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What Determines Firm’s Innovation? The Case of Catching-up CEE Countries
Purpose: The purpose of the paper is to recognize significant innovation determinants on firms’ product, process, and overall innovation activity. Methodology/Approach: The source of data for the analysis is the Community Innovation Survey 2012-2014. If the company has implemented the relevant innovation activity, they acquire a value of 1, or, if the company has not performed a certain activity in the period, they reached 0. As the variables are binary, the logistic regression analysis was used. Findings: Based on the results from the analysis, we defined the proper determinants of firms’ innovation activities but unfortunately, firms are not able to achieve innovative outputs, specifically within CEE countries. This is due, among other things, to several factors such as different conditions in individual countries, different innovation policies at the national as well as company level, managerial approach (aversion) to risk, mistrust between the various actors, and many others. A typical example is the impact of internal R&D on firm innovations. While in the case of product innovations we found a significant positive impact, in the case of process innovations the impact was negative Research Limitation/Implication: We performed on outdated data and we did not make a comparison with countries from Western Europe. Originality/Value of paper: The paper analyses innovation determinants and it is importance for innovation activities within the CEE countries. Category: Research paper
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
16
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Benchmarking of the e-Learning Quality Assurance in Vocational Education and Training: Project Results Mapping the Accidents and Unsafe Conditions of Workers in the Automotive Sector Developing a Systematic and Practical Road Map for Implementing Quality 4.0 Quality 4.0 in Digital Manufacturing – Example of Good Practice Comparative Analysis of Innovation Districts to Set Up Performance Goals for Tec Innovation District
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1