综合城市社会项目PIUS和Casa Analco FABUAP。两个项目位于城市的外围和中心,寻求公民参与

IF 0.1 0 ARCHITECTURE On the Waterfront Pub Date : 2021-06-25 DOI:10.1344/waterfront2021.63.5.01
Adriana Hernández Sánchez
{"title":"综合城市社会项目PIUS和Casa Analco FABUAP。两个项目位于城市的外围和中心,寻求公民参与","authors":"Adriana Hernández Sánchez","doi":"10.1344/waterfront2021.63.5.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work exemplifies a search for participation for the promotion of urban-architectural projects both in the center and in the periphery of a Mexican city such as Puebla, where twenty years ago few activities were developed in which the main actors were the inhabitants. Fortunately, in recent years it has been possible to carry out specific actions where participation is a key part of having a less technical vision on the part of architects, urban planners and heritage conservators.The first project is the Integral Urban Social Program in which, through a municipal action, an attempt was made to implement a participatory process in sectors considered to be of extreme poverty where municipal government programs tried to impact the areas called PIUS. An important part was the Participatory Design process that mobilized the main universities of the city through young architecture students to carry out a series of projects where the condition was to have contact with the communities.In the case of the Casa Analco project, a university initiative in the historic centre of the city in a very traditional neighbourhood (16th century) with problems of deterioration, abandonment and insecurity, with which the university-neighbourhood link is currently promoted and in where space has been the pretext to promote university participation in the rehabilitation of a building, but at the same time in a rapprochement with the neighbourhood.Through these two cases it is confirmed that it is possible to make participation possible through a process that must be adapted to each place, these experiences leave a series of reflections in different areas, from which a basic process can be broken down to encourage it through organization, promotion, awareness of the work team, knowledge of the place, time, evaluation, management and adaptability.","PeriodicalId":41149,"journal":{"name":"On the Waterfront","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Programas Integrales Urbano-Sociales PIUS y Casa Analco FABUAP. Dos proyectos en la periferia y el centro de la ciudad en búsqueda de la participación ciudadana\",\"authors\":\"Adriana Hernández Sánchez\",\"doi\":\"10.1344/waterfront2021.63.5.01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This work exemplifies a search for participation for the promotion of urban-architectural projects both in the center and in the periphery of a Mexican city such as Puebla, where twenty years ago few activities were developed in which the main actors were the inhabitants. Fortunately, in recent years it has been possible to carry out specific actions where participation is a key part of having a less technical vision on the part of architects, urban planners and heritage conservators.The first project is the Integral Urban Social Program in which, through a municipal action, an attempt was made to implement a participatory process in sectors considered to be of extreme poverty where municipal government programs tried to impact the areas called PIUS. An important part was the Participatory Design process that mobilized the main universities of the city through young architecture students to carry out a series of projects where the condition was to have contact with the communities.In the case of the Casa Analco project, a university initiative in the historic centre of the city in a very traditional neighbourhood (16th century) with problems of deterioration, abandonment and insecurity, with which the university-neighbourhood link is currently promoted and in where space has been the pretext to promote university participation in the rehabilitation of a building, but at the same time in a rapprochement with the neighbourhood.Through these two cases it is confirmed that it is possible to make participation possible through a process that must be adapted to each place, these experiences leave a series of reflections in different areas, from which a basic process can be broken down to encourage it through organization, promotion, awareness of the work team, knowledge of the place, time, evaluation, management and adaptability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"On the Waterfront\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"On the Waterfront\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1344/waterfront2021.63.5.01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"On the Waterfront","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1344/waterfront2021.63.5.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项工作是寻求参与促进城市建筑项目的例子,无论是在墨西哥城市的中心还是在墨西哥城市的外围,比如普埃布拉,20年前,在那里很少有活动是由居民主导的。幸运的是,近年来已经有可能开展具体行动,其中参与是建筑师,城市规划者和遗产保护者的技术视野较少的关键部分。第一个项目是“综合城市社会计划”(integrated Urban Social Program),通过一项市政行动,试图在极端贫困地区实施参与式进程,市政府计划试图影响到被称为PIUS的地区。一个重要的部分是参与式设计过程,通过年轻的建筑专业学生动员城市的主要大学开展一系列项目,这些项目的条件是与社区接触。在Casa Analco项目中,一所大学位于城市历史中心的一个非常传统的社区(16世纪),存在着退化、废弃和不安全的问题,目前正在促进大学与社区的联系,在这里,空间已经成为促进大学参与建筑修复的借口,但同时也与社区和睦相处。通过这两个案例,证实了通过一个必须适应每个地方的过程来实现参与是可能的,这些经验在不同的领域留下了一系列的反思,从中可以分解出一个基本的过程,通过组织、推广、对工作团队的认识、对地点、时间、评估、管理和适应性的了解来鼓励参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Programas Integrales Urbano-Sociales PIUS y Casa Analco FABUAP. Dos proyectos en la periferia y el centro de la ciudad en búsqueda de la participación ciudadana
This work exemplifies a search for participation for the promotion of urban-architectural projects both in the center and in the periphery of a Mexican city such as Puebla, where twenty years ago few activities were developed in which the main actors were the inhabitants. Fortunately, in recent years it has been possible to carry out specific actions where participation is a key part of having a less technical vision on the part of architects, urban planners and heritage conservators.The first project is the Integral Urban Social Program in which, through a municipal action, an attempt was made to implement a participatory process in sectors considered to be of extreme poverty where municipal government programs tried to impact the areas called PIUS. An important part was the Participatory Design process that mobilized the main universities of the city through young architecture students to carry out a series of projects where the condition was to have contact with the communities.In the case of the Casa Analco project, a university initiative in the historic centre of the city in a very traditional neighbourhood (16th century) with problems of deterioration, abandonment and insecurity, with which the university-neighbourhood link is currently promoted and in where space has been the pretext to promote university participation in the rehabilitation of a building, but at the same time in a rapprochement with the neighbourhood.Through these two cases it is confirmed that it is possible to make participation possible through a process that must be adapted to each place, these experiences leave a series of reflections in different areas, from which a basic process can be broken down to encourage it through organization, promotion, awareness of the work team, knowledge of the place, time, evaluation, management and adaptability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
On the Waterfront
On the Waterfront ARCHITECTURE-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
33.30%
发文量
10
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Un museo urbano efímero Dar vida a las azoteas: luces y sombras desde la mirada de las comunidades de vecinos. El caso del distrito de Ciutat Vella (Barcelona) El fenómeno visual del vandalismo en la protesta ciudadana contra el monumento y la memoria franquista ¿Arte urbano antes de los tres años? Art enticements in cultural waterfronts: their perimuseal span in the Bilbao estuary beyond the Guggenheim
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1