叛逆的妻子,疏忽的丈夫:现代古兰经注释中的争论

IF 0.4 2区 哲学 0 RELIGION Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations Pub Date : 2023-04-03 DOI:10.1080/09596410.2023.2217623
Natana J. DeLong‐Bas
{"title":"叛逆的妻子,疏忽的丈夫:现代古兰经注释中的争论","authors":"Natana J. DeLong‐Bas","doi":"10.1080/09596410.2023.2217623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"larities between Sabri’s concept of ḥukm al-Islām and Qutb’s concept of ḥākimiyya, Hammond (235–7) argues that Qutb was more likely to have been influenced by Sabri than by others (such as, e.g., the German political philosopher Carl Schmitt, as Khaled Abou el-Fadl has argued). However, the book presents no evidence that Sabri had a direct influence on Qutb; there is no evidence, for example, of Qutb citing any of Sabri’s works, let alone embracing his concepts, apart from the fact that both ‘attended same salons’ in Cairo, and some of Sabri’s publications were supported by al-Banna (236). The evidence presented for Mustafa Sabri’s influence on Sayyid Qutb is not persuasive. Second, some chapters devote disproportionately little space to discussion of the views of the three chosen intellectuals. For example, while Chapter 5 promises to discuss the views of Akif, Sabri and Kevseri regarding the modern nation-state, it is in fact less about them and more about the origins of the political Islamist movement in Egypt. Third, while the last chapter discusses modern Islamic though in Turkey, and specifically how Said Nursi’s views and followers influenced republican Islam and the trajectory of Islamism, Hammond fails to discuss whether and how students and followers of Akif, Sabri and Kevseri such as Ali Ulvi Kurucu, Mehmet Ihsan Efendi and Mustafa Runyun, amongst others, may have influenced present-day Islamic thinking. Overall, Late Ottoman Origins of Modern Islamic Though offers a refreshing analysis of the views of Mehmet Akif Ersoy, Mustafa Sabri and Zahid Kevseri, who have indeed been ‘largely erased via disciplinary conventions’ (265) but who play a significant part in broader Islamic intellectual history with their influential anti-modernist and anti-Salafist views. This is a must read for those interested in modern Islamic thought.","PeriodicalId":45172,"journal":{"name":"Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rebellious Wives, Neglectful Husbands: Controversies in Modern Qur’anic Commentaries\",\"authors\":\"Natana J. DeLong‐Bas\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09596410.2023.2217623\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"larities between Sabri’s concept of ḥukm al-Islām and Qutb’s concept of ḥākimiyya, Hammond (235–7) argues that Qutb was more likely to have been influenced by Sabri than by others (such as, e.g., the German political philosopher Carl Schmitt, as Khaled Abou el-Fadl has argued). However, the book presents no evidence that Sabri had a direct influence on Qutb; there is no evidence, for example, of Qutb citing any of Sabri’s works, let alone embracing his concepts, apart from the fact that both ‘attended same salons’ in Cairo, and some of Sabri’s publications were supported by al-Banna (236). The evidence presented for Mustafa Sabri’s influence on Sayyid Qutb is not persuasive. Second, some chapters devote disproportionately little space to discussion of the views of the three chosen intellectuals. For example, while Chapter 5 promises to discuss the views of Akif, Sabri and Kevseri regarding the modern nation-state, it is in fact less about them and more about the origins of the political Islamist movement in Egypt. Third, while the last chapter discusses modern Islamic though in Turkey, and specifically how Said Nursi’s views and followers influenced republican Islam and the trajectory of Islamism, Hammond fails to discuss whether and how students and followers of Akif, Sabri and Kevseri such as Ali Ulvi Kurucu, Mehmet Ihsan Efendi and Mustafa Runyun, amongst others, may have influenced present-day Islamic thinking. Overall, Late Ottoman Origins of Modern Islamic Though offers a refreshing analysis of the views of Mehmet Akif Ersoy, Mustafa Sabri and Zahid Kevseri, who have indeed been ‘largely erased via disciplinary conventions’ (265) but who play a significant part in broader Islamic intellectual history with their influential anti-modernist and anti-Salafist views. This is a must read for those interested in modern Islamic thought.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45172,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09596410.2023.2217623\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09596410.2023.2217623","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在萨布里的ḥukm al-Islām概念和库特布的ḥākimiyya概念之间的差异,哈蒙德(235-7)认为库特布更有可能受到萨布里的影响,而不是受到其他人的影响(例如,如哈立德·阿布·法德尔所认为的德国政治哲学家卡尔·施密特)。然而,这本书没有提出证据表明萨布里对库特有直接的影响;例如,没有证据表明库特布引用了萨布里的任何作品,更不用说接受他的概念了,除了两人在开罗“参加同一个沙龙”,以及萨布里的一些出版物得到了al-Banna的支持(236)。穆斯塔法·萨布里影响赛义德·库特布的证据并不具有说服力。其次,有些章节对三位被选中的知识分子的观点的讨论篇幅少得不成比例。例如,虽然第5章承诺讨论Akif、Sabri和Kevseri对现代民族国家的看法,但实际上并没有涉及到他们,而是更多地讨论了埃及政治伊斯兰运动的起源。第三,虽然最后一章讨论了土耳其的现代伊斯兰教,特别是赛义德·努尔西的观点和追随者如何影响了伊斯兰共和国的伊斯兰教和伊斯兰主义的轨迹,但哈蒙没有讨论Akif、Sabri和Kevseri的学生和追随者,如Ali Ulvi Kurucu、Mehmet Ihsan Efendi和Mustafa Runyun等人是否以及如何影响了当今的伊斯兰思想。总的来说,《现代伊斯兰教的奥斯曼帝国后期起源》对穆罕默德·阿基夫·埃尔索伊、穆斯塔法·萨布里和扎希德·克夫塞里的观点进行了令人耳目一新的分析,他们确实“在很大程度上被学科惯例抹去了”(265),但他们以其有影响力的反现代主义和反萨拉菲斯特观点在更广泛的伊斯兰思想史上发挥了重要作用。对于那些对现代伊斯兰思想感兴趣的人来说,这是一本必读的书。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rebellious Wives, Neglectful Husbands: Controversies in Modern Qur’anic Commentaries
larities between Sabri’s concept of ḥukm al-Islām and Qutb’s concept of ḥākimiyya, Hammond (235–7) argues that Qutb was more likely to have been influenced by Sabri than by others (such as, e.g., the German political philosopher Carl Schmitt, as Khaled Abou el-Fadl has argued). However, the book presents no evidence that Sabri had a direct influence on Qutb; there is no evidence, for example, of Qutb citing any of Sabri’s works, let alone embracing his concepts, apart from the fact that both ‘attended same salons’ in Cairo, and some of Sabri’s publications were supported by al-Banna (236). The evidence presented for Mustafa Sabri’s influence on Sayyid Qutb is not persuasive. Second, some chapters devote disproportionately little space to discussion of the views of the three chosen intellectuals. For example, while Chapter 5 promises to discuss the views of Akif, Sabri and Kevseri regarding the modern nation-state, it is in fact less about them and more about the origins of the political Islamist movement in Egypt. Third, while the last chapter discusses modern Islamic though in Turkey, and specifically how Said Nursi’s views and followers influenced republican Islam and the trajectory of Islamism, Hammond fails to discuss whether and how students and followers of Akif, Sabri and Kevseri such as Ali Ulvi Kurucu, Mehmet Ihsan Efendi and Mustafa Runyun, amongst others, may have influenced present-day Islamic thinking. Overall, Late Ottoman Origins of Modern Islamic Though offers a refreshing analysis of the views of Mehmet Akif Ersoy, Mustafa Sabri and Zahid Kevseri, who have indeed been ‘largely erased via disciplinary conventions’ (265) but who play a significant part in broader Islamic intellectual history with their influential anti-modernist and anti-Salafist views. This is a must read for those interested in modern Islamic thought.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations (ICMR) provides a forum for the academic exploration and discussion of the religious tradition of Islam, and of relations between Islam and other religions. It is edited by members of the Department of Theology and Religion, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom. The editors welcome articles on all aspects of Islam, and particularly on: •the religion and culture of Islam, historical and contemporary •Islam and its relations with other faiths and ideologies •Christian-Muslim relations. Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations is a refereed, academic journal. It publishes articles, documentation and reviews.
期刊最新文献
The Prophet Muḥammad between Lived Religion and Elite Discourse: Rethinking and Decolonizing Christian Assessments of the uswa ḥasana through Comparative Theological Aesthetics Islamic Headscarves: The Other-Religion Effect and Religious Literacy at the European Court of Human Rights The Fatimids 2: The Rule from Egypt and Shiʿite Rulers, Sunni Rivals, and Christians in Between: Muslim–Christian Relations in Fāṭimid Palestine and Egypt The Fatimids 2: The Rule from Egypt , by Shainool Jiwa[World of Islam], London, I.B. Tauris in association with the Institute of Ismaili Studies, 2023, vi + 238 pp., £9.99 (paperback), ISBN 9780755646753 Shiʿite Rulers, Sunni Rivals, and Christians in Between: Muslim–Christian Relations in Fāṭimid Palestine and Egypt , by Steven… The Concept of Soul in Judaism, Christianity and Islam The Concept of Soul in Judaism, Christianity and Islam , edited by Christoph Böttingheimer and Wenzel Maximilian Widenka [Key Concepts in Interreligious Discourses 11], Berlin, De Gruyter, 2023, vii+132 pp., €24.95 (paperback), ISBN 978 3 11 074818 5 The Genoese Predicament: Christian–Muslim Communication in the Annales Ianuenses ( c. 1099–1293)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1