诱发-对抗-识别-解决-强化(ECIRR)学习模式的实施通过控制学习动机对工艺与创业(PKWU)学习成果的影响

IF 1.1 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences-RIMCIS Pub Date : 2023-03-29 DOI:10.37329/ijms.v1i1.2370
Ni Made Griantari, Ni Putu Sri Wati
{"title":"诱发-对抗-识别-解决-强化(ECIRR)学习模式的实施通过控制学习动机对工艺与创业(PKWU)学习成果的影响","authors":"Ni Made Griantari, Ni Putu Sri Wati","doi":"10.37329/ijms.v1i1.2370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aimed to (1) describe the difference in PKWU learning outcomes results of grade XI Students of SMA NEGERI 1 Mengwi who studied using Elicit, Confront, Identify, Resolve, Reinforce (ECIRR) learning method and students who studied using the conventional method before and after students’ learning motivation variables were controlled and (2) describe the contribution on the learning outcome of students’ motivation variables on grade XI Students of SMA NEGERI 1 Mengwi who studied using Elicit, Confront, Identify, Resolve, Reinforce (ECIRR) and students who studied using conventional learning model. This research is experimental research (quasi-experimental) using a “post-test only control group) research design. The data were analyzed using one-way statistical analysis of variance (ANOVA) and one-way analysis of covariance (ANAKOVA) using F-test. The population of this research was all students of grade XI of SMA NEGERI 1 Mengwi with 15 study groups. The samples of this research were collected using sampling technique that was a random sampling technique. From 15 study groups, one group was taken as an experimental group (the group studied using Elicit, Confront, Identify, Resolve, Reinforce (ECIRR) learning model and another group was taken as a control group (the group studied using the conventional learning model). It was selected by lottery technique. The result of statistical analysis showed that (1) there was a difference in PKWU learning outcomes between students who studied using Elicit, Confront, Identify, Resolve, Reinforce (ECIRR) learning model and conventional model with Fcount= 17, 247 with significant (p)= 0,000 (p<0,05), (2). It also showed there was a difference in PKWU learning outcomes of students who studied using Elicit, Confront, Identify, Resolves, Reinforce (ECIRR) model and conventional model after the students’ learning motivation variables were controlled with Fcount = 27, 209; and (3) there was a positive and significant contribution between learning motivation and PKWU learning outcomes of 27, 04%. Based on the results, it can be concluded that Elicit, Confront, Identify, Resolve, Reinforce (ECIRR) learning model contributed to the PKWU learning outcomes before and after the students’ learning motivation variables were controlled.","PeriodicalId":43006,"journal":{"name":"International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences-RIMCIS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Influence of The Implementation of Elicit, Confront, Identify, Resolve, Reinforce (ECIRR) Learning Model on Learning Outcomes of Craft And Entrepreneurship (PKWU) By Controlling Learning Motivation\",\"authors\":\"Ni Made Griantari, Ni Putu Sri Wati\",\"doi\":\"10.37329/ijms.v1i1.2370\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research aimed to (1) describe the difference in PKWU learning outcomes results of grade XI Students of SMA NEGERI 1 Mengwi who studied using Elicit, Confront, Identify, Resolve, Reinforce (ECIRR) learning method and students who studied using the conventional method before and after students’ learning motivation variables were controlled and (2) describe the contribution on the learning outcome of students’ motivation variables on grade XI Students of SMA NEGERI 1 Mengwi who studied using Elicit, Confront, Identify, Resolve, Reinforce (ECIRR) and students who studied using conventional learning model. This research is experimental research (quasi-experimental) using a “post-test only control group) research design. The data were analyzed using one-way statistical analysis of variance (ANOVA) and one-way analysis of covariance (ANAKOVA) using F-test. The population of this research was all students of grade XI of SMA NEGERI 1 Mengwi with 15 study groups. The samples of this research were collected using sampling technique that was a random sampling technique. From 15 study groups, one group was taken as an experimental group (the group studied using Elicit, Confront, Identify, Resolve, Reinforce (ECIRR) learning model and another group was taken as a control group (the group studied using the conventional learning model). It was selected by lottery technique. The result of statistical analysis showed that (1) there was a difference in PKWU learning outcomes between students who studied using Elicit, Confront, Identify, Resolve, Reinforce (ECIRR) learning model and conventional model with Fcount= 17, 247 with significant (p)= 0,000 (p<0,05), (2). It also showed there was a difference in PKWU learning outcomes of students who studied using Elicit, Confront, Identify, Resolves, Reinforce (ECIRR) model and conventional model after the students’ learning motivation variables were controlled with Fcount = 27, 209; and (3) there was a positive and significant contribution between learning motivation and PKWU learning outcomes of 27, 04%. Based on the results, it can be concluded that Elicit, Confront, Identify, Resolve, Reinforce (ECIRR) learning model contributed to the PKWU learning outcomes before and after the students’ learning motivation variables were controlled.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43006,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences-RIMCIS\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences-RIMCIS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37329/ijms.v1i1.2370\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences-RIMCIS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37329/ijms.v1i1.2370","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究为实验研究(准实验),采用“后测只设对照组”的研究设计。资料分析采用单因素方差统计分析(ANOVA),单因素协方差分析(ANAKOVA)采用f检验。本研究的样本是采用随机抽样的抽样技术收集的。从15个学习小组中选取一组作为实验组(采用引出、面对、识别、解决、强化(Elicit, Confront, Identify, Resolve, Reinforce, ECIRR)学习模式学习),另一组作为对照组(采用常规学习模式学习)。它是通过摇号技术选出的。统计分析结果显示:(1)采用诱发、对抗、识别、解决、强化(ECIRR)学习模式的学生与常规学习模式的学生在PKWU学习结果上存在差异(Fcount= 17,247, p< 0.05);(2)采用诱发、对抗、识别、解决、强化(Elicit, Confront, Identify, Resolves, p< 0.05)学习模式的学生在PKWU学习结果上也存在差异。对学生学习动机变量进行Fcount = 27,209控制后,强化(ECIRR)模型与常规模型;(3)学习动机对PKWU学习成果的正向显著贡献为2704%。结果表明,在控制学生学习动机变量前后,引出、面对、识别、解决、强化(ECIRR)学习模式对PKWU学习效果有显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Influence of The Implementation of Elicit, Confront, Identify, Resolve, Reinforce (ECIRR) Learning Model on Learning Outcomes of Craft And Entrepreneurship (PKWU) By Controlling Learning Motivation
This research aimed to (1) describe the difference in PKWU learning outcomes results of grade XI Students of SMA NEGERI 1 Mengwi who studied using Elicit, Confront, Identify, Resolve, Reinforce (ECIRR) learning method and students who studied using the conventional method before and after students’ learning motivation variables were controlled and (2) describe the contribution on the learning outcome of students’ motivation variables on grade XI Students of SMA NEGERI 1 Mengwi who studied using Elicit, Confront, Identify, Resolve, Reinforce (ECIRR) and students who studied using conventional learning model. This research is experimental research (quasi-experimental) using a “post-test only control group) research design. The data were analyzed using one-way statistical analysis of variance (ANOVA) and one-way analysis of covariance (ANAKOVA) using F-test. The population of this research was all students of grade XI of SMA NEGERI 1 Mengwi with 15 study groups. The samples of this research were collected using sampling technique that was a random sampling technique. From 15 study groups, one group was taken as an experimental group (the group studied using Elicit, Confront, Identify, Resolve, Reinforce (ECIRR) learning model and another group was taken as a control group (the group studied using the conventional learning model). It was selected by lottery technique. The result of statistical analysis showed that (1) there was a difference in PKWU learning outcomes between students who studied using Elicit, Confront, Identify, Resolve, Reinforce (ECIRR) learning model and conventional model with Fcount= 17, 247 with significant (p)= 0,000 (p<0,05), (2). It also showed there was a difference in PKWU learning outcomes of students who studied using Elicit, Confront, Identify, Resolves, Reinforce (ECIRR) model and conventional model after the students’ learning motivation variables were controlled with Fcount = 27, 209; and (3) there was a positive and significant contribution between learning motivation and PKWU learning outcomes of 27, 04%. Based on the results, it can be concluded that Elicit, Confront, Identify, Resolve, Reinforce (ECIRR) learning model contributed to the PKWU learning outcomes before and after the students’ learning motivation variables were controlled.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.20%
发文量
9
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Harmonization Between Humans and Animals Particularly the Balinese Dog Race in Bali Ethics And Social Procedures In Lontara Pappaseng As A Guideline And Philosophy Of Life Of Buginese Society In South Sulawesi Hindu Religious Ethics Values and Tolerance In Darmakaya's Gaguritan An Analysis of Differences in Online and Offline Learning at Mahardika Elementary School of Denpasar Humanist, Pluralist, and Dialogical Concepts in Hindu Theology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1