公民投票和制宪会议:玻利维亚的部门自治

IF 0.1 4区 社会学 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE Revista Del Clad Reforma Y Democracia Pub Date : 2006-12-01 DOI:10.7440/colombiaint64.2006.03
F. Ugarte
{"title":"公民投票和制宪会议:玻利维亚的部门自治","authors":"F. Ugarte","doi":"10.7440/colombiaint64.2006.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On 2 July 2006, Boliva held a national referendum about departamental autonomy as part of the process of state decentralization and as an institutional response to the dire political and social crisis.The inclusion in the constitution of figures such as referendum, constitutional assembly and citizen legislative initiation was the response to the social demands and unrest given under the framework of semidirect democracy which allowed for an institutional solution to them. Even though the law that called for the referendum defines its national character, in several articles it states that a regime of departamental autonomy will apply immediately after the new Constitution is ratified in those departments where the referendum question was approved by a simple majority of the vote. This dual interpretation with regards to the mandatory nature of the results \"at the national or the departamental level \"is added to the debate about the nature of the autonomies.The party of the government, whose position won in the referendum and won a majority of the constitutional assembly, sketches a proposal that includes different versions of autonomy \"indigenous, regional, provincial, cantonal, communal \"that run counter, in some instances, to the departamental autonomies. In sum, the referendum on departamental autonomy, far from solving the problem, has transfered it to the constitutional assembly which puts at risk the democratic legitimacy of its decisions given that the new constitution must answer the demands of diverse political and social actors. Aside from these dynamics, this experience of citizen participation in the decisiom-making process is an example of the positive impact of an institutional reform in the strengthening of the democratic legitimacy and the efficacy of political institutions.","PeriodicalId":53210,"journal":{"name":"Revista Del Clad Reforma Y Democracia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2006-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Referendúm y Asamblea Constituyente: autonomías departamentales en Bolivia\",\"authors\":\"F. Ugarte\",\"doi\":\"10.7440/colombiaint64.2006.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"On 2 July 2006, Boliva held a national referendum about departamental autonomy as part of the process of state decentralization and as an institutional response to the dire political and social crisis.The inclusion in the constitution of figures such as referendum, constitutional assembly and citizen legislative initiation was the response to the social demands and unrest given under the framework of semidirect democracy which allowed for an institutional solution to them. Even though the law that called for the referendum defines its national character, in several articles it states that a regime of departamental autonomy will apply immediately after the new Constitution is ratified in those departments where the referendum question was approved by a simple majority of the vote. This dual interpretation with regards to the mandatory nature of the results \\\"at the national or the departamental level \\\"is added to the debate about the nature of the autonomies.The party of the government, whose position won in the referendum and won a majority of the constitutional assembly, sketches a proposal that includes different versions of autonomy \\\"indigenous, regional, provincial, cantonal, communal \\\"that run counter, in some instances, to the departamental autonomies. In sum, the referendum on departamental autonomy, far from solving the problem, has transfered it to the constitutional assembly which puts at risk the democratic legitimacy of its decisions given that the new constitution must answer the demands of diverse political and social actors. Aside from these dynamics, this experience of citizen participation in the decisiom-making process is an example of the positive impact of an institutional reform in the strengthening of the democratic legitimacy and the efficacy of political institutions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Del Clad Reforma Y Democracia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Del Clad Reforma Y Democracia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7440/colombiaint64.2006.03\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Del Clad Reforma Y Democracia","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7440/colombiaint64.2006.03","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

2006年7月2日,玻利维亚举行了一次关于省自治的全国公民投票,作为国家权力下放进程的一部分,也是对可怕的政治和社会危机的制度性反应。在宪法中列入诸如公民投票、制宪会议和公民立法发起等数字是对在半直接民主框架下提出的社会要求和动乱的反应,这使得它们能够得到体制上的解决。尽管要求进行全民投票的法律规定了其国民性,但在若干条款中规定,在以简单多数投票通过全民投票问题的那些省批准新宪法后,将立即实行省自治制度。这种关于“在国家或部门层面”的强制性结果的双重解释,增加了关于自治性质的辩论。执政党在公投中获胜,并赢得了制宪会议的多数席位,该党草拟了一份提案,其中包括不同版本的自治:“土著、地区、省、州、社区”,在某些情况下,这些自治与部门自治背道而驰。总而言之,关于省自治的公民投票非但没有解决问题,反而把问题转移给了制宪会议,这使制宪会议的决定的民主合法性受到威胁,因为新宪法必须满足各种政治和社会行动者的要求。除了这些动态之外,公民参与决策过程的这一经验是体制改革在加强民主合法性和政治机构效力方面产生积极影响的一个例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Referendúm y Asamblea Constituyente: autonomías departamentales en Bolivia
On 2 July 2006, Boliva held a national referendum about departamental autonomy as part of the process of state decentralization and as an institutional response to the dire political and social crisis.The inclusion in the constitution of figures such as referendum, constitutional assembly and citizen legislative initiation was the response to the social demands and unrest given under the framework of semidirect democracy which allowed for an institutional solution to them. Even though the law that called for the referendum defines its national character, in several articles it states that a regime of departamental autonomy will apply immediately after the new Constitution is ratified in those departments where the referendum question was approved by a simple majority of the vote. This dual interpretation with regards to the mandatory nature of the results "at the national or the departamental level "is added to the debate about the nature of the autonomies.The party of the government, whose position won in the referendum and won a majority of the constitutional assembly, sketches a proposal that includes different versions of autonomy "indigenous, regional, provincial, cantonal, communal "that run counter, in some instances, to the departamental autonomies. In sum, the referendum on departamental autonomy, far from solving the problem, has transfered it to the constitutional assembly which puts at risk the democratic legitimacy of its decisions given that the new constitution must answer the demands of diverse political and social actors. Aside from these dynamics, this experience of citizen participation in the decisiom-making process is an example of the positive impact of an institutional reform in the strengthening of the democratic legitimacy and the efficacy of political institutions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Es una publicación cuatrimestral arbitrada dedicada a estimular el progreso intelectual en la comprensión sobre las relaciones Estado-Sociedad, así como a divulgar propuestas y alternativas para orientar las transformaciones requeridas en la Administración Pública. La Secretaría General prepara la revista y está dirigida a autoridades gubernamentales, académicos, funcionarios internacionales, investigadores, estudiantes y consultores especializados, así como a cualquier persona interesada en los temas vinculados al sector público.
期刊最新文献
Tensores reaccionarios a combatir y tensores progresistas a incentivar para lograr la institucionalización e innovación pública en América Latina El surgimiento de la democracia constitucional de derechos y justicia en Ecuador Análisis de diseño de políticas nacionales concurrentes desde la perspectiva del federalismo Problemas de coordinación y coherencia en la política pública de modernización… del Poder Ejecutivo de Perú ¿Qué se entiende por "Estado neoweberiano"?… Aportes para el debate teórico en perspectiva latinoamericana
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1