{"title":"天气学伯里科普目","authors":"Michael Mcloughlin","doi":"10.2143/ETL.85.1.2040696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A list of triple tradition pericopes is derived, demonstrating that Matthew or Luke or both always agree with the pericope sequence found in Mark. The same agreement with Mark is also found for the verses, and (usually) for the wording. It follows that Mark, or a document with almost identical wording, is intermediary in the causal chain that connects the three synoptics. In this role it is not bypassed by any competitor. In recent times the data on pericope order has been used to revive the source theory of Griesbach, but that use is resisted.","PeriodicalId":42509,"journal":{"name":"Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses","volume":"28 1","pages":"71-97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2009-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Synoptic Pericope Order\",\"authors\":\"Michael Mcloughlin\",\"doi\":\"10.2143/ETL.85.1.2040696\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A list of triple tradition pericopes is derived, demonstrating that Matthew or Luke or both always agree with the pericope sequence found in Mark. The same agreement with Mark is also found for the verses, and (usually) for the wording. It follows that Mark, or a document with almost identical wording, is intermediary in the causal chain that connects the three synoptics. In this role it is not bypassed by any competitor. In recent times the data on pericope order has been used to revive the source theory of Griesbach, but that use is resisted.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42509,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"71-97\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2143/ETL.85.1.2040696\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2143/ETL.85.1.2040696","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
A list of triple tradition pericopes is derived, demonstrating that Matthew or Luke or both always agree with the pericope sequence found in Mark. The same agreement with Mark is also found for the verses, and (usually) for the wording. It follows that Mark, or a document with almost identical wording, is intermediary in the causal chain that connects the three synoptics. In this role it is not bypassed by any competitor. In recent times the data on pericope order has been used to revive the source theory of Griesbach, but that use is resisted.
期刊介绍:
Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses (ETL), founded in 1924, is a quarterly publication by professors of Theology and Canon Law at the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven and the Université catholique de Louvain (Louvain-la-Neuve). Each volume totals ca. 1300 pages. Issues 1 (April) and 4 (December) contain articles, book reviews and chronicles in various languages (English, French, German). Issue 2-3 (September) represents the annual Elenchus Bibliographicus, an extensive bibliography of books and articles that appeared during the preceding year. The bibliography (ca. 15,000 entries) covers the entire field of Theology and Canon Law: History of Theology, History of Religions.