治疗师人际行为:各种构式和潜在能力的调查

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY Verhaltenstherapie Pub Date : 2023-01-12 DOI:10.1159/000526953
Christine Wolfer, P. Hilpert, C. Flückiger
{"title":"治疗师人际行为:各种构式和潜在能力的调查","authors":"Christine Wolfer, P. Hilpert, C. Flückiger","doi":"10.1159/000526953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Psychotherapists differ in their treatment effectiveness as measured by the therapy outcome of their patients. One possible factor for therapist effects seems to be the therapists’ interpersonal skills. Therapist assessments of interpersonal skills have demonstrated sufficient predictive validity, but little is known about underlying skills and related constructs. The purpose of the present study is to compare the different constructs of interpersonal skills with each other and to investigate possible underlying abilities. Study Population and Methods: In this exploratory study, the concept of interpersonal skills was investigated using three survey methods (questionnaires, computer tests, and assessments) and comparing two measurements each. For this purpose, 6 measures of interpersonal skills were collected from 20 prospective psychotherapists as well as 28 psychology students (total N = 48). Alongside more traditional methods, the correlations and overlaps of the constructs were examined using partial and Bayesian networks. Results: Moderate to high correlations are found within the self-report measures. The assessments, however, did not correlate with self-report measures nor with computer tests. Discussion and Conclusion: The similarities in the self-assessments indicate stable self-concepts of interpersonal skills, which, however, cannot be explained by the underlying skills nor by the observer-based evaluations. The marginal correlation between the assessments also indicates that interpersonal, therapy-related abilities must be interpreted in a situation-specific manner.","PeriodicalId":49386,"journal":{"name":"Verhaltenstherapie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Therapist Interpersonal Behavior: An Investigation of Various Constructs and Underlying Abilities\",\"authors\":\"Christine Wolfer, P. Hilpert, C. Flückiger\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000526953\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Psychotherapists differ in their treatment effectiveness as measured by the therapy outcome of their patients. One possible factor for therapist effects seems to be the therapists’ interpersonal skills. Therapist assessments of interpersonal skills have demonstrated sufficient predictive validity, but little is known about underlying skills and related constructs. The purpose of the present study is to compare the different constructs of interpersonal skills with each other and to investigate possible underlying abilities. Study Population and Methods: In this exploratory study, the concept of interpersonal skills was investigated using three survey methods (questionnaires, computer tests, and assessments) and comparing two measurements each. For this purpose, 6 measures of interpersonal skills were collected from 20 prospective psychotherapists as well as 28 psychology students (total N = 48). Alongside more traditional methods, the correlations and overlaps of the constructs were examined using partial and Bayesian networks. Results: Moderate to high correlations are found within the self-report measures. The assessments, however, did not correlate with self-report measures nor with computer tests. Discussion and Conclusion: The similarities in the self-assessments indicate stable self-concepts of interpersonal skills, which, however, cannot be explained by the underlying skills nor by the observer-based evaluations. The marginal correlation between the assessments also indicates that interpersonal, therapy-related abilities must be interpreted in a situation-specific manner.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49386,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Verhaltenstherapie\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Verhaltenstherapie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000526953\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Verhaltenstherapie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000526953","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:心理治疗师的治疗效果不同,以患者的治疗结果为衡量标准。影响治疗师效果的一个可能因素似乎是治疗师的人际交往能力。治疗师对人际交往能力的评估已经证明了足够的预测有效性,但对潜在技能和相关结构知之甚少。本研究的目的是比较人际交往能力的不同构念,并探讨可能的潜在能力。研究人群与方法:本研究采用三种调查方法(问卷调查、电脑测试和评估)对人际交往能力的概念进行了调查,并比较了每种方法的两种测量结果。为此,我们从20名心理治疗师和28名心理学专业学生(共48名)中收集了6项人际交往能力的测量数据。除了更传统的方法外,还使用部分贝叶斯网络和贝叶斯网络检查了结构的相关性和重叠。结果:在自我报告测量中发现中度到高度的相关性。然而,这些评估与自我报告测量和计算机测试没有关联。讨论与结论:自我评价的相似性表明人际交往能力的自我概念是稳定的,但这既不能用基础技能来解释,也不能用观察者评价来解释。评估之间的边际相关性也表明,人际关系,治疗相关的能力必须在特定的情况下解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Therapist Interpersonal Behavior: An Investigation of Various Constructs and Underlying Abilities
Objective: Psychotherapists differ in their treatment effectiveness as measured by the therapy outcome of their patients. One possible factor for therapist effects seems to be the therapists’ interpersonal skills. Therapist assessments of interpersonal skills have demonstrated sufficient predictive validity, but little is known about underlying skills and related constructs. The purpose of the present study is to compare the different constructs of interpersonal skills with each other and to investigate possible underlying abilities. Study Population and Methods: In this exploratory study, the concept of interpersonal skills was investigated using three survey methods (questionnaires, computer tests, and assessments) and comparing two measurements each. For this purpose, 6 measures of interpersonal skills were collected from 20 prospective psychotherapists as well as 28 psychology students (total N = 48). Alongside more traditional methods, the correlations and overlaps of the constructs were examined using partial and Bayesian networks. Results: Moderate to high correlations are found within the self-report measures. The assessments, however, did not correlate with self-report measures nor with computer tests. Discussion and Conclusion: The similarities in the self-assessments indicate stable self-concepts of interpersonal skills, which, however, cannot be explained by the underlying skills nor by the observer-based evaluations. The marginal correlation between the assessments also indicates that interpersonal, therapy-related abilities must be interpreted in a situation-specific manner.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Verhaltenstherapie
Verhaltenstherapie 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
24
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Die Zeitschrift «Verhaltenstherapie» bildet das breite Spektrum verhaltenstherapeutischer Verfahren ab und ist im deutschen Sprachraum das führende Publikationsorgan ihres Fachgebiets.
期刊最新文献
Erratum. Erratum. Nachruf und Würdigung für Dianne L. Chambless (1948–2023) [Video-Based Online Metta-Meditation Therapy for Depression: A Pilot Trial Evaluating the Acceptability and Feasibility]. Taube Menschen in Deutschland: Mental Health Literacy und Einschätzung der Angebote des psychiatrisch-psychotherapeutischen Versorgungssystems – eine Online-Studie
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1