“铲除”不成比例的监管:卡纳瓦普判决后欧盟CBD的自由流动

Bogdan-Florin Nae
{"title":"“铲除”不成比例的监管:卡纳瓦普判决后欧盟CBD的自由流动","authors":"Bogdan-Florin Nae","doi":"10.54648/leie2021033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As cannabidiol’s (CBD) popularity has been increasing, multiple questions to as to its legal regime, including under European Union (EU) law, have been raised. In its preliminary ruling in the Kanavape case, the European Court of Justice, for the first time, clarifies that CBD falls under the free movement of goods provisions in primary EU law (Articles 34 and 36 Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)). This case note critically addresses the Court’s reasonsing, while putting the case in its broader legal and policy context.\nArticle 34 TFEU, Article 36 TFEU, cannabidiol (CBD), narcotic drugs, negative integration, UN drug conventions, Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties","PeriodicalId":42718,"journal":{"name":"Legal Issues of Economic Integration","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Weed-ing’ Out Disproportionate Regulation: The Free Movement of CBD in the European Union Following the Kanavape Judgment\",\"authors\":\"Bogdan-Florin Nae\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/leie2021033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As cannabidiol’s (CBD) popularity has been increasing, multiple questions to as to its legal regime, including under European Union (EU) law, have been raised. In its preliminary ruling in the Kanavape case, the European Court of Justice, for the first time, clarifies that CBD falls under the free movement of goods provisions in primary EU law (Articles 34 and 36 Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)). This case note critically addresses the Court’s reasonsing, while putting the case in its broader legal and policy context.\\nArticle 34 TFEU, Article 36 TFEU, cannabidiol (CBD), narcotic drugs, negative integration, UN drug conventions, Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties\",\"PeriodicalId\":42718,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Legal Issues of Economic Integration\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Legal Issues of Economic Integration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/leie2021033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal Issues of Economic Integration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/leie2021033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

随着大麻二酚(CBD)越来越受欢迎,有关其法律制度(包括欧盟法律)的多个问题也被提出。在卡纳瓦普案的初步裁决中,欧洲法院首次澄清,《生物多样性公约》属于欧盟主要法律(《欧盟运作条约》(TFEU)第34条和第36条)中货物自由流动的规定。本案件说明批判性地论述了法院的推理,同时将案件置于更广泛的法律和政策背景中。第34条TFEU,第36条TFEU,大麻二酚(CBD),麻醉药品,负面一体化,联合国毒品公约,维也纳条约法公约
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
‘Weed-ing’ Out Disproportionate Regulation: The Free Movement of CBD in the European Union Following the Kanavape Judgment
As cannabidiol’s (CBD) popularity has been increasing, multiple questions to as to its legal regime, including under European Union (EU) law, have been raised. In its preliminary ruling in the Kanavape case, the European Court of Justice, for the first time, clarifies that CBD falls under the free movement of goods provisions in primary EU law (Articles 34 and 36 Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)). This case note critically addresses the Court’s reasonsing, while putting the case in its broader legal and policy context. Article 34 TFEU, Article 36 TFEU, cannabidiol (CBD), narcotic drugs, negative integration, UN drug conventions, Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊最新文献
The EU’s Anti-coercion Instrument: A Return of Unlawful Unilateral Trade Countermeasures in Disguise? Editorial: Investment Protection in an Integrated Europe – The Non-Enforcement of Intra-EU Investment Arbitration Awards as the Ultimate Test Case for Strasbourg’s Deference Doctrines Why Do (High-Income) Countries Wish to Green Their Trade Agreements? The Application of Regulation 452/2019 in Response to Chinese Foreign Direct Investment The ESM Reform and Its Missing Legitimacy in Non-Euro Area Member States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1