以麦芽糖糊精为益生元的低脂生物酸奶的制备及性能研究

O. E. Batawy, O. Khalil
{"title":"以麦芽糖糊精为益生元的低脂生物酸奶的制备及性能研究","authors":"O. E. Batawy, O. Khalil","doi":"10.4172/2329-8901.1000192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Objective: Significant research has been focused in discovering which prebiotics is most beneficial in increasing the levels of probiotic bacteria in the gastrointestinal tract. Therefore, the present study was carried out to investigate the effect of adding maltodextrin as prebiotics on the properties and survival of different probiotic strains in low-fat bio-yoghurt during cold storage. Methodology: Low-fat bio-yoghurt was made using probiotic strains (Lb acidophilus NCTC12980R and Bifidobacterium bifidium NCTC1300R) and 2% maltodextrin as well as compared with traditional starter (Str. thermophilus and Lb. delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus). Bio-yoghurt samples were evaluated for chemical, microbiological and organoleptic properties during storage at 4°C for 21 days. Results: The type of starter culture used did not affect on the dry matter, ash contents and viscosity in different bio-yoghurt. Culture combinations, fortification of maltodextrin and storage period significantly influenced on the acidity, SN\\TN, diacetyle, acetaldehyde contents and viscosity in different bio-yoghurt. The results showed that maltodextrtin had no significant effect on the viability of yoghurt cultures and Lb. acidophilus strain while, it stimulated the growth of Bifi. bifidum starter bacteria to a great extent. Generally, the counts of probiotic strains used in bio-yoghurt made with maltodextrin were still higher than the recommended minimum levels (107 cfu/ ml) along the storage period. Conclusion: Addition of maltodextrin and use of probiotic strains such as Lb. acidophilus and Bifi. bifidum enhanced the sensory properties of bio-yoghurt samples when fresh and along the storage period.","PeriodicalId":16865,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Probiotics & Health","volume":"21 1","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Manufacture and Properties of Low-Fat Bio Yoghurt Containing Probiotic Strains and Maltodextrin as Prebiotic Osama El\",\"authors\":\"O. E. Batawy, O. Khalil\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2329-8901.1000192\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and Objective: Significant research has been focused in discovering which prebiotics is most beneficial in increasing the levels of probiotic bacteria in the gastrointestinal tract. Therefore, the present study was carried out to investigate the effect of adding maltodextrin as prebiotics on the properties and survival of different probiotic strains in low-fat bio-yoghurt during cold storage. Methodology: Low-fat bio-yoghurt was made using probiotic strains (Lb acidophilus NCTC12980R and Bifidobacterium bifidium NCTC1300R) and 2% maltodextrin as well as compared with traditional starter (Str. thermophilus and Lb. delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus). Bio-yoghurt samples were evaluated for chemical, microbiological and organoleptic properties during storage at 4°C for 21 days. Results: The type of starter culture used did not affect on the dry matter, ash contents and viscosity in different bio-yoghurt. Culture combinations, fortification of maltodextrin and storage period significantly influenced on the acidity, SN\\\\TN, diacetyle, acetaldehyde contents and viscosity in different bio-yoghurt. The results showed that maltodextrtin had no significant effect on the viability of yoghurt cultures and Lb. acidophilus strain while, it stimulated the growth of Bifi. bifidum starter bacteria to a great extent. Generally, the counts of probiotic strains used in bio-yoghurt made with maltodextrin were still higher than the recommended minimum levels (107 cfu/ ml) along the storage period. Conclusion: Addition of maltodextrin and use of probiotic strains such as Lb. acidophilus and Bifi. bifidum enhanced the sensory properties of bio-yoghurt samples when fresh and along the storage period.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16865,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Probiotics & Health\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Probiotics & Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-8901.1000192\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Probiotics & Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-8901.1000192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景与目的:研究哪些益生元对提高胃肠道中益生菌的水平最有益。因此,本研究旨在研究添加麦芽糖糊精作为益生元对低脂生物酸奶冷藏过程中不同益生菌菌种特性及存活的影响。方法:采用益生菌菌株(Lb . acidophilus NCTC12980R和双歧杆菌NCTC1300R)和2%麦芽糊精配制低脂生物酸奶,并与传统发酵剂(Str. thermophilus和Lb. delbrueckii ssp)进行比较。发酵剂)保加利亚。在4°C条件下保存21天,对生物酸奶样品的化学、微生物和感官特性进行了评估。结果:发酵剂种类对不同生物酸奶的干物质、灰分含量和粘度没有影响。培养组合、麦芽糖糊精强化和贮藏时间对不同生物酸奶的酸度、SN\TN、二乙酰、乙醛含量和粘度有显著影响。结果表明,麦芽糊精对酸奶培养物和嗜酸lb菌株的活力无显著影响,但对Bifi的生长有促进作用。两歧发酵菌在很大程度上。一般情况下,使用麦芽糊精制作的生物酸奶中益生菌的数量在贮存期间仍高于推荐的最低水平(107 cfu/ ml)。结论:添加麦芽糊精和使用嗜酸杆菌、Bifi等益生菌。两歧双歧杆菌在新鲜和贮存期间增强了生物酸奶样品的感官特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Manufacture and Properties of Low-Fat Bio Yoghurt Containing Probiotic Strains and Maltodextrin as Prebiotic Osama El
Background and Objective: Significant research has been focused in discovering which prebiotics is most beneficial in increasing the levels of probiotic bacteria in the gastrointestinal tract. Therefore, the present study was carried out to investigate the effect of adding maltodextrin as prebiotics on the properties and survival of different probiotic strains in low-fat bio-yoghurt during cold storage. Methodology: Low-fat bio-yoghurt was made using probiotic strains (Lb acidophilus NCTC12980R and Bifidobacterium bifidium NCTC1300R) and 2% maltodextrin as well as compared with traditional starter (Str. thermophilus and Lb. delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus). Bio-yoghurt samples were evaluated for chemical, microbiological and organoleptic properties during storage at 4°C for 21 days. Results: The type of starter culture used did not affect on the dry matter, ash contents and viscosity in different bio-yoghurt. Culture combinations, fortification of maltodextrin and storage period significantly influenced on the acidity, SN\TN, diacetyle, acetaldehyde contents and viscosity in different bio-yoghurt. The results showed that maltodextrtin had no significant effect on the viability of yoghurt cultures and Lb. acidophilus strain while, it stimulated the growth of Bifi. bifidum starter bacteria to a great extent. Generally, the counts of probiotic strains used in bio-yoghurt made with maltodextrin were still higher than the recommended minimum levels (107 cfu/ ml) along the storage period. Conclusion: Addition of maltodextrin and use of probiotic strains such as Lb. acidophilus and Bifi. bifidum enhanced the sensory properties of bio-yoghurt samples when fresh and along the storage period.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bacillus Bacteria as Probiotics The Industry Originated Probiotic Bacteria Role in COVID-19 The Evaluation of the Effects of Orange Juice on the Microflora, Haematologyand Selected Organs of Albino Rats Antibiotic Resistance in Lactic Acid Bacteria The Role of Dietary Fiber and Microbiome Composition to Decrease theDeleterious Effects of Nano-Plastic in Monogastric Animals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1