{"title":"我赶时间,我不想知道!时间压力下的战略无知","authors":"Johannes Jarke-Neuert, J. Lohse","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3699289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Information avoidance is common when privately beneficial choices have uncertain and potentially adverse effects on others. A dominant theory holds that such \"strategic ignorance\" allows decision makers to circumvent inner moral conflict while acting self-servingly. In extension of this theory, we hypothesize that time pressure elevates the prevalence of strategic ignorance. We conduct a laboratory experiment with resolvable payoff uncertainty to test this hypothesis. We find that time pressure indeed significantly increases the incidence of information avoidance. As a result, self-serving choices are more common than in a baseline without time pressure. We empirically explore several potential interpretations of this main finding. First, in a control condition, in which payoffs are fully transparent, time pressure has no direct effect on self-serving behavior. This speaks against a general tendency to act more self-servingly or fairly under time pressure. Second, a follow-up study shows that information avoidance under time pressure is attributable to conflict avoidance, rather than providing decision makers with a convenient excuse for not becoming informed. We discuss these observations in the context of a recent body of literature on the cognitive underpinnings of prosocial behavior and argue that they have significant implications for information-based approaches to public policy. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":10477,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Social Science eJournal","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"I’m in a Hurry, I Don’t Want to Know! Strategic Ignorance Under Time Pressure\",\"authors\":\"Johannes Jarke-Neuert, J. Lohse\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3699289\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Information avoidance is common when privately beneficial choices have uncertain and potentially adverse effects on others. A dominant theory holds that such \\\"strategic ignorance\\\" allows decision makers to circumvent inner moral conflict while acting self-servingly. In extension of this theory, we hypothesize that time pressure elevates the prevalence of strategic ignorance. We conduct a laboratory experiment with resolvable payoff uncertainty to test this hypothesis. We find that time pressure indeed significantly increases the incidence of information avoidance. As a result, self-serving choices are more common than in a baseline without time pressure. We empirically explore several potential interpretations of this main finding. First, in a control condition, in which payoffs are fully transparent, time pressure has no direct effect on self-serving behavior. This speaks against a general tendency to act more self-servingly or fairly under time pressure. Second, a follow-up study shows that information avoidance under time pressure is attributable to conflict avoidance, rather than providing decision makers with a convenient excuse for not becoming informed. We discuss these observations in the context of a recent body of literature on the cognitive underpinnings of prosocial behavior and argue that they have significant implications for information-based approaches to public policy. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).\",\"PeriodicalId\":10477,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive Social Science eJournal\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive Social Science eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3699289\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Social Science eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3699289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
摘要
当对个人有利的选择对他人有不确定的和潜在的不利影响时,信息回避是常见的。一种占主导地位的理论认为,这种“战略无知”允许决策者在采取自私行为的同时规避内心的道德冲突。在这一理论的延伸,我们假设时间压力提高了战略无知的普遍性。我们进行了一个具有可解决的收益不确定性的实验室实验来验证这一假设。我们发现,时间压力确实显著增加了信息回避的发生率。因此,比起没有时间压力的基线,自我服务的选择更常见。我们从经验上探讨了对这一主要发现的几种可能的解释。首先,在报酬完全透明的控制条件下,时间压力对自利行为没有直接影响。这与在时间压力下表现得更自私或更公平的普遍趋势背道而驰。其次,一项后续研究表明,时间压力下的信息回避是由于冲突回避,而不是为决策者提供不知情的方便借口。我们在最近一篇关于亲社会行为认知基础的文献中讨论了这些观察结果,并认为它们对基于信息的公共政策方法具有重要意义。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA,版权所有)。
I’m in a Hurry, I Don’t Want to Know! Strategic Ignorance Under Time Pressure
Information avoidance is common when privately beneficial choices have uncertain and potentially adverse effects on others. A dominant theory holds that such "strategic ignorance" allows decision makers to circumvent inner moral conflict while acting self-servingly. In extension of this theory, we hypothesize that time pressure elevates the prevalence of strategic ignorance. We conduct a laboratory experiment with resolvable payoff uncertainty to test this hypothesis. We find that time pressure indeed significantly increases the incidence of information avoidance. As a result, self-serving choices are more common than in a baseline without time pressure. We empirically explore several potential interpretations of this main finding. First, in a control condition, in which payoffs are fully transparent, time pressure has no direct effect on self-serving behavior. This speaks against a general tendency to act more self-servingly or fairly under time pressure. Second, a follow-up study shows that information avoidance under time pressure is attributable to conflict avoidance, rather than providing decision makers with a convenient excuse for not becoming informed. We discuss these observations in the context of a recent body of literature on the cognitive underpinnings of prosocial behavior and argue that they have significant implications for information-based approaches to public policy. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).