司法报告的紧张制作:未成年人的社会刑事评估案例

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Deviance et Societe Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.3917/DS.444.0043
Rébecca Chouinard, Joane Martel
{"title":"司法报告的紧张制作:未成年人的社会刑事评估案例","authors":"Rébecca Chouinard, Joane Martel","doi":"10.3917/DS.444.0043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Criminal justice, the presentence report informs the judiciary about the young person and his or her social context prior to sentencing. In Quebec, those who craft these reports are psychosocial workers. Few studies sufficiently address organizational realities that stand between policies and the work of these professionals. This article highlights that the writing of presentence reports sits between two antagonistic logics of action. One is influenced by organizational strategies to standardise the reports and the other by contextual pressures experienced by the professionals. The article concludes that the ongoing clash of these logics generates discrepant signals culminating in an undebated tension. Confronted with such undiscussed tensions, professionals opt for reconciliation of the tension that open the door to creative practices.","PeriodicalId":43688,"journal":{"name":"Deviance et Societe","volume":"23 1","pages":"561-596"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La fabrication sous tension de rapports judiciaires : le cas de l’évaluation socio-pénale des mineurs\",\"authors\":\"Rébecca Chouinard, Joane Martel\",\"doi\":\"10.3917/DS.444.0043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In Criminal justice, the presentence report informs the judiciary about the young person and his or her social context prior to sentencing. In Quebec, those who craft these reports are psychosocial workers. Few studies sufficiently address organizational realities that stand between policies and the work of these professionals. This article highlights that the writing of presentence reports sits between two antagonistic logics of action. One is influenced by organizational strategies to standardise the reports and the other by contextual pressures experienced by the professionals. The article concludes that the ongoing clash of these logics generates discrepant signals culminating in an undebated tension. Confronted with such undiscussed tensions, professionals opt for reconciliation of the tension that open the door to creative practices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43688,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Deviance et Societe\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"561-596\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Deviance et Societe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3917/DS.444.0043\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Deviance et Societe","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/DS.444.0043","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在刑事司法中,出庭报告在判决前向司法机构通报年轻人及其社会背景。在魁北克,撰写这些报告的是社会心理工作者。很少有研究充分处理政策和这些专业人员工作之间的组织现实。本文强调了在场报告的写作处于两种对立的行动逻辑之间。一个受组织战略的影响,以使报告标准化,另一个受专业人员所经历的环境压力的影响。文章的结论是,这些逻辑的持续冲突产生了不一致的信号,最终导致了一种未经辩论的紧张局势。面对这种未经讨论的紧张局势,专业人士选择和解的紧张打开了创造性实践的大门。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
La fabrication sous tension de rapports judiciaires : le cas de l’évaluation socio-pénale des mineurs
In Criminal justice, the presentence report informs the judiciary about the young person and his or her social context prior to sentencing. In Quebec, those who craft these reports are psychosocial workers. Few studies sufficiently address organizational realities that stand between policies and the work of these professionals. This article highlights that the writing of presentence reports sits between two antagonistic logics of action. One is influenced by organizational strategies to standardise the reports and the other by contextual pressures experienced by the professionals. The article concludes that the ongoing clash of these logics generates discrepant signals culminating in an undebated tension. Confronted with such undiscussed tensions, professionals opt for reconciliation of the tension that open the door to creative practices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
50.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Déviance et société analyse, à travers les courants de recherche les plus récents, à des phénomènes de société tels que l"insécurité, les drogues, les délinquances, la prostitution, la corruption, la criminalité organisée, les peines privatives de liberté, etc... D"une manière générale, Déviance et Société propose, sur la base d"une culture de coopération scientifique internationale, des textes relatifs à l"analyse des normativités, des déviances, des politiques de prévention et du processus pénal.
期刊最新文献
Penser la (petite) corruption dans certains pays d’Afrique Subsaharienne : l’apport de l’approche compréhensive Soigner, punir ou gérer des flux : les apories des politiques pénales françaises à l’encontre des usagers de drogues La responsabilisation des auteurs de violences conjugales à l’épreuve de leurs stratégies de contestation des décisions pénales La psychiatrie forensique en Suisse : au risque de l’instrumentalisation sécuritaire et positiviste Les travaux sur la désistance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1