立陶宛知识分子文学的问题:以Ramūnas克里马斯为例

Q3 Arts and Humanities Colloquia Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI:10.51554/coll.21.47.07
Kristina Tutlytė
{"title":"立陶宛知识分子文学的问题:以Ramūnas克里马斯为例","authors":"Kristina Tutlytė","doi":"10.51554/coll.21.47.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using the approach of cognitive poetics, the author of the article analyses Ramūnas Klimas’ story, Gintė ir jos žmogus [Gintė and Her Man]. By employing Peter Stockwell’s concept of cognitive deixis, the technique of deictic transfer and aspects of schema theory in the text, the fundamental mechanisms of the construction of the story have been highlighted, which in turn, lead to the observation that the text provokes the delayed categorization discussed by Reuven Tsur. In the text, the deictic center of the implicit reader is being developed in different temporal and spatial dimensions using deixis of the respective categories. The interpretation is complicated by the highlighting of the textual deixis: several versions of the same story are presented, the process of the narration itself is commented, and the reader is addressed directly, which, according to Stockwell, can be understood as an attempt to destroy the reader’s belief in the truthfulness of the story being told and to put them out. These formal features also determine the depth and multi-layered nature of the text. Looking at the formal elements of the text and the techniques it employs from the point of view of cognitive poetics, the story by Klimas can be viewed as an attempt to criticize the official Soviet discourse and undermine the dangers of trusting blindly the truth proclaimed by one man.","PeriodicalId":37193,"journal":{"name":"Colloquia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The problem of Intellectual Lithuanian Literature: The Case of Ramūnas Klimas\",\"authors\":\"Kristina Tutlytė\",\"doi\":\"10.51554/coll.21.47.07\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Using the approach of cognitive poetics, the author of the article analyses Ramūnas Klimas’ story, Gintė ir jos žmogus [Gintė and Her Man]. By employing Peter Stockwell’s concept of cognitive deixis, the technique of deictic transfer and aspects of schema theory in the text, the fundamental mechanisms of the construction of the story have been highlighted, which in turn, lead to the observation that the text provokes the delayed categorization discussed by Reuven Tsur. In the text, the deictic center of the implicit reader is being developed in different temporal and spatial dimensions using deixis of the respective categories. The interpretation is complicated by the highlighting of the textual deixis: several versions of the same story are presented, the process of the narration itself is commented, and the reader is addressed directly, which, according to Stockwell, can be understood as an attempt to destroy the reader’s belief in the truthfulness of the story being told and to put them out. These formal features also determine the depth and multi-layered nature of the text. Looking at the formal elements of the text and the techniques it employs from the point of view of cognitive poetics, the story by Klimas can be viewed as an attempt to criticize the official Soviet discourse and undermine the dangers of trusting blindly the truth proclaimed by one man.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Colloquia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Colloquia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51554/coll.21.47.07\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Colloquia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51554/coll.21.47.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文作者运用认知诗学的方法,分析Ramūnas Klimas的故事gintkv ir jos žmogus [gintkv和她的男人]。通过运用彼得·斯托克韦尔的认知指示概念、指示语迁移技术以及语篇中的图式理论,作者强调了故事构建的基本机制,并由此观察到语篇引发了Reuven Tsur所讨论的延迟分类现象。在语篇中,内隐读者的指示中心在不同的时间和空间维度上利用各自范畴的指示进行发展。对文本指示的强调使解释变得复杂:呈现了同一个故事的几个版本,对叙述本身的过程进行了评论,并直接针对读者,根据斯托克韦尔的说法,这可以理解为试图破坏读者对所讲故事真实性的信念,并将其排除出去。这些形式特征也决定了文本的深度和层次性。从认知诗学的角度来看文本的形式元素和它所使用的技巧,克里马斯的故事可以被视为批评苏联官方话语的一种尝试,并破坏盲目相信一个人所宣布的真理的危险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The problem of Intellectual Lithuanian Literature: The Case of Ramūnas Klimas
Using the approach of cognitive poetics, the author of the article analyses Ramūnas Klimas’ story, Gintė ir jos žmogus [Gintė and Her Man]. By employing Peter Stockwell’s concept of cognitive deixis, the technique of deictic transfer and aspects of schema theory in the text, the fundamental mechanisms of the construction of the story have been highlighted, which in turn, lead to the observation that the text provokes the delayed categorization discussed by Reuven Tsur. In the text, the deictic center of the implicit reader is being developed in different temporal and spatial dimensions using deixis of the respective categories. The interpretation is complicated by the highlighting of the textual deixis: several versions of the same story are presented, the process of the narration itself is commented, and the reader is addressed directly, which, according to Stockwell, can be understood as an attempt to destroy the reader’s belief in the truthfulness of the story being told and to put them out. These formal features also determine the depth and multi-layered nature of the text. Looking at the formal elements of the text and the techniques it employs from the point of view of cognitive poetics, the story by Klimas can be viewed as an attempt to criticize the official Soviet discourse and undermine the dangers of trusting blindly the truth proclaimed by one man.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Colloquia
Colloquia Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Kilmingosios raganos atspindys skirtinguose veidrodžiuose: Veronikos iš Desenicės motyvo transformacija slovėnų kultūros kanone Icchokas Meras’ ‘Lygiosios trunka akimirką’ (Stalemate) in the UnequalBattle Against the Censors ,,Tas laisvės troškimas“ (arba Kodėl verta tyrinėti jaunimo subkultūrines grupes) Žurnalo „Дружба народов“ redakcija. Drg. Mero rankraščio aptarimo stenograma. 1963 m. liepos 8 d. The Biography of a Writer as an Argument in (De)Canonisation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1