加纳的COVID-19叙事和反叙事:国家信息传递的辩证法和替代的重建/解构

IF 1 4区 文学 Q3 COMMUNICATION Journal of African Media Studies Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1386/jams_00069_1
Kwame Akuffo Anoff-Ntow, Wisdom J. Tettey
{"title":"加纳的COVID-19叙事和反叙事:国家信息传递的辩证法和替代的重建/解构","authors":"Kwame Akuffo Anoff-Ntow, Wisdom J. Tettey","doi":"10.1386/jams_00069_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As part of its efforts to manage the pandemic, the government of Ghana has tried to control messaging via press conferences, only to find out that it has to contend with a preponderance of, sometimes conflicting, narratives from a variety of sources. These messages come from traditional and social media, adopting conventional and alternative formats for content and delivery. In this article, we examine the dialectical relationship between the government’s COVID-19 communication strategy and alternative messages from a select range of sources that have emerged. We evaluate the extent to which the latter messages reinforced or undermined official narratives; the relative trust that each set of messages is generating among citizens; the implications for effective management of the crisis; and steps that the state took to maintain/regain control as it sought to combat what it considered to be (dis)misinformation from some of these sources.","PeriodicalId":43702,"journal":{"name":"Journal of African Media Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COVID-19 narratives and counter-narratives in Ghana: The dialectics of state messaging and alternative re/de-constructions\",\"authors\":\"Kwame Akuffo Anoff-Ntow, Wisdom J. Tettey\",\"doi\":\"10.1386/jams_00069_1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As part of its efforts to manage the pandemic, the government of Ghana has tried to control messaging via press conferences, only to find out that it has to contend with a preponderance of, sometimes conflicting, narratives from a variety of sources. These messages come from traditional and social media, adopting conventional and alternative formats for content and delivery. In this article, we examine the dialectical relationship between the government’s COVID-19 communication strategy and alternative messages from a select range of sources that have emerged. We evaluate the extent to which the latter messages reinforced or undermined official narratives; the relative trust that each set of messages is generating among citizens; the implications for effective management of the crisis; and steps that the state took to maintain/regain control as it sought to combat what it considered to be (dis)misinformation from some of these sources.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of African Media Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of African Media Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1386/jams_00069_1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of African Media Studies","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/jams_00069_1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

作为控制疫情努力的一部分,加纳政府试图通过新闻发布会控制信息传递,结果却发现,它不得不与来自各种来源的、有时相互矛盾的大量叙述作斗争。这些信息来自传统和社交媒体,采用传统和替代格式的内容和传递。在本文中,我们研究了政府的COVID-19传播策略与已出现的一系列精选来源的替代信息之间的辩证关系。我们评估了后一种信息在多大程度上加强或破坏了官方叙述;每组信息在公民中产生的相对信任;对有效管理危机的影响;以及政府为维持/重新获得控制权而采取的措施,因为它试图打击它认为来自其中一些来源的(disdis)错误信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 narratives and counter-narratives in Ghana: The dialectics of state messaging and alternative re/de-constructions
As part of its efforts to manage the pandemic, the government of Ghana has tried to control messaging via press conferences, only to find out that it has to contend with a preponderance of, sometimes conflicting, narratives from a variety of sources. These messages come from traditional and social media, adopting conventional and alternative formats for content and delivery. In this article, we examine the dialectical relationship between the government’s COVID-19 communication strategy and alternative messages from a select range of sources that have emerged. We evaluate the extent to which the latter messages reinforced or undermined official narratives; the relative trust that each set of messages is generating among citizens; the implications for effective management of the crisis; and steps that the state took to maintain/regain control as it sought to combat what it considered to be (dis)misinformation from some of these sources.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Religion, authority and denunciation in the paradigm of mediatization: The case of the Congolese diaspora of the Salvation Army Social media, socialization and discursive politics Status of women in the Ghanaian media: Are women conscious of their own inequalities? Meme-ing Malawi’s 2019 presidential election: Humour, hope and disillusionment Community radio and post-conflict peace building: A study of Orisun 89.5 FM in Ife–Modakeke, Osun State, Nigeria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1