{"title":"一件值得记住的事情:1965年,威诺克","authors":"Tom F. S. McFeat","doi":"10.7202/1084161ar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Following the exclusion of their children from the\nnearby Anglo high school in June 1965, a series of events\noccurred at the reserve community of Winoque which\nculminated in an apparently unrelated dispute over the\nproposed use of band funds to secure independence from\nthe town.\n The community had been divided between two\nfactions, self-defined as crowds. The leader of the crowd I\nidentified as Restricters was the chief; the leader of the\nother crowd I identified as Extenders would be that\nchiefs opposition in the November elections.\n Crowds then, were in part ideologically committed to\naction at the Indian/non Indian boundary. Restricters\nidealized this as a barrier or void whereas Extenders\nidealized it as a path or boundary zone. Put to the test in\nthe issue of whether the community should send its\nchildren back to the high school, if invited, the crowds\nwere forced to modify positions in the face of public\nopinion.","PeriodicalId":84519,"journal":{"name":"Culture (Canadian Ethnology Society)","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Affair to Remember: Winoque, 1965\",\"authors\":\"Tom F. S. McFeat\",\"doi\":\"10.7202/1084161ar\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Following the exclusion of their children from the\\nnearby Anglo high school in June 1965, a series of events\\noccurred at the reserve community of Winoque which\\nculminated in an apparently unrelated dispute over the\\nproposed use of band funds to secure independence from\\nthe town.\\n The community had been divided between two\\nfactions, self-defined as crowds. The leader of the crowd I\\nidentified as Restricters was the chief; the leader of the\\nother crowd I identified as Extenders would be that\\nchiefs opposition in the November elections.\\n Crowds then, were in part ideologically committed to\\naction at the Indian/non Indian boundary. Restricters\\nidealized this as a barrier or void whereas Extenders\\nidealized it as a path or boundary zone. Put to the test in\\nthe issue of whether the community should send its\\nchildren back to the high school, if invited, the crowds\\nwere forced to modify positions in the face of public\\nopinion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":84519,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Culture (Canadian Ethnology Society)\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Culture (Canadian Ethnology Society)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7202/1084161ar\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Culture (Canadian Ethnology Society)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1084161ar","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Following the exclusion of their children from the
nearby Anglo high school in June 1965, a series of events
occurred at the reserve community of Winoque which
culminated in an apparently unrelated dispute over the
proposed use of band funds to secure independence from
the town.
The community had been divided between two
factions, self-defined as crowds. The leader of the crowd I
identified as Restricters was the chief; the leader of the
other crowd I identified as Extenders would be that
chiefs opposition in the November elections.
Crowds then, were in part ideologically committed to
action at the Indian/non Indian boundary. Restricters
idealized this as a barrier or void whereas Extenders
idealized it as a path or boundary zone. Put to the test in
the issue of whether the community should send its
children back to the high school, if invited, the crowds
were forced to modify positions in the face of public
opinion.