制度转换框架下养老金资产负债模拟

Samuel de Visser, F. Hamelink
{"title":"制度转换框架下养老金资产负债模拟","authors":"Samuel de Visser, F. Hamelink","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2381551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we build a simple ALM model where future scenarios are generated assuming a Markov regime switching framework. Using the Shiller database of monthly equity returns and interest rate data since 1870, two regimes are revealed by the data that clearly correspond to a \"normal regime\" where returns behave like expected from economic theory, and a \"high volatility\" regime we may also refer to as a \"crisis regime\". Given the evidence of the non-stationarity of economic variables, we investigate the added value of reducing risk in the portfolio when the model indicates a high probability of a regime shift. The persistence of each of the regimes is high. This framework gives, each month and for each scenario, the probability of being in one of the two regimes, and hence the multivariate distribution of the simulated variables that pertains to the relevant regime. These variables are 1) equity returns, 2) long term (10-year) interest rates, 3) realized inflation, and 4) short term (6-month) interest rates. We then investigate a number of relevant statistics of the terminal wealth achieved after a 20-year period for two typical portfolios: a long-only portfolio well-diversified over stocks and bonds where the relevant metric is the portfolio’s value (for instance, an endowment fund), and a pension fund’s coverage ratio where the fund’s liabilities are valued by a market interest rate curve. We show that both types of investors greatly benefit from adjusting their exposure to equities and interest rates conditionally on the expected risk regime. Finally, we show the consequence when both the endowment fund manager and the pension fund board members optimize their own reward/risk ratio from their job. We argue that in such a case they seek to minimize the probability of large losses (either in absolute terms or relative to the pension fund’s liabilities), while maximizing the minimum level of wealth (or coverage ratio for the pension fund) achieved with a given (say 95%) confidence level. We quantify the added value of the risk-regime depending allocations for such managers.","PeriodicalId":11800,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Stock Market Risk (Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simulating Pension's Assets and Liabilities in a Regime Switching Framework\",\"authors\":\"Samuel de Visser, F. Hamelink\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2381551\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper we build a simple ALM model where future scenarios are generated assuming a Markov regime switching framework. Using the Shiller database of monthly equity returns and interest rate data since 1870, two regimes are revealed by the data that clearly correspond to a \\\"normal regime\\\" where returns behave like expected from economic theory, and a \\\"high volatility\\\" regime we may also refer to as a \\\"crisis regime\\\". Given the evidence of the non-stationarity of economic variables, we investigate the added value of reducing risk in the portfolio when the model indicates a high probability of a regime shift. The persistence of each of the regimes is high. This framework gives, each month and for each scenario, the probability of being in one of the two regimes, and hence the multivariate distribution of the simulated variables that pertains to the relevant regime. These variables are 1) equity returns, 2) long term (10-year) interest rates, 3) realized inflation, and 4) short term (6-month) interest rates. We then investigate a number of relevant statistics of the terminal wealth achieved after a 20-year period for two typical portfolios: a long-only portfolio well-diversified over stocks and bonds where the relevant metric is the portfolio’s value (for instance, an endowment fund), and a pension fund’s coverage ratio where the fund’s liabilities are valued by a market interest rate curve. We show that both types of investors greatly benefit from adjusting their exposure to equities and interest rates conditionally on the expected risk regime. Finally, we show the consequence when both the endowment fund manager and the pension fund board members optimize their own reward/risk ratio from their job. We argue that in such a case they seek to minimize the probability of large losses (either in absolute terms or relative to the pension fund’s liabilities), while maximizing the minimum level of wealth (or coverage ratio for the pension fund) achieved with a given (say 95%) confidence level. We quantify the added value of the risk-regime depending allocations for such managers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Stock Market Risk (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Stock Market Risk (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2381551\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Stock Market Risk (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2381551","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我们建立了一个简单的ALM模型,其中未来场景是在假设马尔可夫状态切换框架下生成的。利用希勒自1870年以来月度股票回报和利率数据数据库,数据揭示了两种机制,它们明显符合一种“正常机制”,即回报表现符合经济理论的预期,另一种是“高波动性”机制,我们也可以将其称为“危机机制”。鉴于经济变量的非平稳性的证据,我们研究了当模型表明制度转移的高概率时,降低投资组合风险的附加价值。这两种体制的持久性都很高。该框架给出了每个月和每个场景处于两种状态之一的概率,从而给出了与相关状态相关的模拟变量的多变量分布。这些变量是1)股票收益,2)长期(10年)利率,3)已实现的通货膨胀率,以及4)短期(6个月)利率。然后,我们研究了两种典型投资组合在20年后实现的终端财富的一些相关统计数据:一个只做多的投资组合,在股票和债券上进行了良好的多元化,其中相关指标是投资组合的价值(例如,捐赠基金),以及养老基金的覆盖率,其中基金的负债由市场利率曲线估值。我们表明,这两种类型的投资者都可以根据预期的风险机制有条件地调整他们对股票和利率的敞口,从而大大受益。最后,我们展示了捐赠基金经理和养老基金董事会成员从工作中优化自己的回报/风险比的结果。我们认为,在这种情况下,他们寻求最小化重大损失的可能性(无论是绝对损失还是相对于养老基金的负债),同时最大化在给定(比如95%)置信水平下实现的最低财富水平(或养老基金的覆盖率)。我们量化了风险管理体系的附加价值,这取决于这些管理人员的配置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Simulating Pension's Assets and Liabilities in a Regime Switching Framework
In this paper we build a simple ALM model where future scenarios are generated assuming a Markov regime switching framework. Using the Shiller database of monthly equity returns and interest rate data since 1870, two regimes are revealed by the data that clearly correspond to a "normal regime" where returns behave like expected from economic theory, and a "high volatility" regime we may also refer to as a "crisis regime". Given the evidence of the non-stationarity of economic variables, we investigate the added value of reducing risk in the portfolio when the model indicates a high probability of a regime shift. The persistence of each of the regimes is high. This framework gives, each month and for each scenario, the probability of being in one of the two regimes, and hence the multivariate distribution of the simulated variables that pertains to the relevant regime. These variables are 1) equity returns, 2) long term (10-year) interest rates, 3) realized inflation, and 4) short term (6-month) interest rates. We then investigate a number of relevant statistics of the terminal wealth achieved after a 20-year period for two typical portfolios: a long-only portfolio well-diversified over stocks and bonds where the relevant metric is the portfolio’s value (for instance, an endowment fund), and a pension fund’s coverage ratio where the fund’s liabilities are valued by a market interest rate curve. We show that both types of investors greatly benefit from adjusting their exposure to equities and interest rates conditionally on the expected risk regime. Finally, we show the consequence when both the endowment fund manager and the pension fund board members optimize their own reward/risk ratio from their job. We argue that in such a case they seek to minimize the probability of large losses (either in absolute terms or relative to the pension fund’s liabilities), while maximizing the minimum level of wealth (or coverage ratio for the pension fund) achieved with a given (say 95%) confidence level. We quantify the added value of the risk-regime depending allocations for such managers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Risk-Return Tradeoff Among Equity Factors Predictive Regressions under Arbitrary Persistence and Stock Return Predictability News and Trading After Hours High-Frequency Arbitrage and Market Illiquidity President’s Confidence and the Stock Market Performance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1