《不插电:音乐产业在音乐cd上滚动合同的方法》

N. Aldrich
{"title":"《不插电:音乐产业在音乐cd上滚动合同的方法》","authors":"N. Aldrich","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.943607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The recording industry has begun a shift in its distribution model of music media, transitioning from sales to licensing. Many CDs now come with digital rights management (DRM) in the form of software that, once installed on the end user's computer, enables the user to copy the music to their hard-drive while regulating its use. Recording companies are distributing these CDs with licenses. In order to enact such licensing contracts with end users, record companies started using End User License Agreements (EULA) similar to those used in the software industry, placed on the CD in the form of a rolling contract. The licensing contracts purport not only to control rights to the software on the disc, but they also affect the user's rights to the music itself. Upon accepting the terms of the EULA, the user, who may have enjoyed the music for years prior to discovering the license agreement, apparently loses rights to their use of the CD upon accepting the terms of the EULA. This article provides a three-step analysis of the legal enforceability of music CD licensing contracts: analysis of the legal enforceability of rolling contracts; analysis of the distribution models in the music industry; and an analysis of the merger of the two. The first portion follows the developmental cases in rolling contract theory and discusses the proposed provisions in UCITA for such contracts. The second portion traces the history of legal rights in the music industry including the \"exclusive rights,\" the First Sale Doctrine, and the Fair Use Defense. In the third portion, the author suggests that such licensing contracts are legally unenforceable for either want of consideration or failure to provide meaningful opportunity to assent. The article culminates with a recommendation for legislators to enact certain, relevant portions of UCITA and recommendations for the music industry about how to bring their licensing scheme within the aims and legality of contract law.","PeriodicalId":40000,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Property","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unplugged: The Music Industry's Approach to Rolling Contracts on Music CDs\",\"authors\":\"N. Aldrich\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.943607\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The recording industry has begun a shift in its distribution model of music media, transitioning from sales to licensing. Many CDs now come with digital rights management (DRM) in the form of software that, once installed on the end user's computer, enables the user to copy the music to their hard-drive while regulating its use. Recording companies are distributing these CDs with licenses. In order to enact such licensing contracts with end users, record companies started using End User License Agreements (EULA) similar to those used in the software industry, placed on the CD in the form of a rolling contract. The licensing contracts purport not only to control rights to the software on the disc, but they also affect the user's rights to the music itself. Upon accepting the terms of the EULA, the user, who may have enjoyed the music for years prior to discovering the license agreement, apparently loses rights to their use of the CD upon accepting the terms of the EULA. This article provides a three-step analysis of the legal enforceability of music CD licensing contracts: analysis of the legal enforceability of rolling contracts; analysis of the distribution models in the music industry; and an analysis of the merger of the two. The first portion follows the developmental cases in rolling contract theory and discusses the proposed provisions in UCITA for such contracts. The second portion traces the history of legal rights in the music industry including the \\\"exclusive rights,\\\" the First Sale Doctrine, and the Fair Use Defense. In the third portion, the author suggests that such licensing contracts are legally unenforceable for either want of consideration or failure to provide meaningful opportunity to assent. The article culminates with a recommendation for legislators to enact certain, relevant portions of UCITA and recommendations for the music industry about how to bring their licensing scheme within the aims and legality of contract law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Intellectual Property\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Intellectual Property\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.943607\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Property","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.943607","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

唱片业已经开始转变音乐媒体的分销模式,从销售转向授权。现在许多cd都以软件的形式提供数字版权管理(DRM),一旦安装到终端用户的计算机上,用户就可以将音乐复制到自己的硬盘上,同时控制其使用。唱片公司发行这些带有许可证的cd。为了与终端用户签订这样的许可合同,唱片公司开始使用终端用户许可协议(EULA),类似于软件行业中使用的协议,以滚动合同的形式放在CD上。授权合同声称不仅控制了光盘上软件的权利,而且还影响了用户对音乐本身的权利。在接受EULA的条款后,在发现许可协议之前可能已经享受音乐多年的用户,显然在接受EULA的条款后失去了使用CD的权利。本文对音乐CD许可合同的法律可执行性进行了三步分析:滚动合同的法律可执行性分析;音乐产业的分销模式分析以及对两者合并的分析。第一部分是根据滚动合同理论的发展案例,讨论了UCITA中关于滚动合同的拟议条款。第二部分追溯了音乐产业中合法权利的历史,包括“专有权”、首次销售原则和合理使用辩护。在第三部分中,作者认为,这种许可合同在法律上是不可执行的,要么是缺乏对价,要么是未能提供有意义的同意机会。文章最后建议立法者制定UCITA的某些相关部分,并建议音乐行业如何将他们的许可计划纳入合同法的目标和合法性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Unplugged: The Music Industry's Approach to Rolling Contracts on Music CDs
The recording industry has begun a shift in its distribution model of music media, transitioning from sales to licensing. Many CDs now come with digital rights management (DRM) in the form of software that, once installed on the end user's computer, enables the user to copy the music to their hard-drive while regulating its use. Recording companies are distributing these CDs with licenses. In order to enact such licensing contracts with end users, record companies started using End User License Agreements (EULA) similar to those used in the software industry, placed on the CD in the form of a rolling contract. The licensing contracts purport not only to control rights to the software on the disc, but they also affect the user's rights to the music itself. Upon accepting the terms of the EULA, the user, who may have enjoyed the music for years prior to discovering the license agreement, apparently loses rights to their use of the CD upon accepting the terms of the EULA. This article provides a three-step analysis of the legal enforceability of music CD licensing contracts: analysis of the legal enforceability of rolling contracts; analysis of the distribution models in the music industry; and an analysis of the merger of the two. The first portion follows the developmental cases in rolling contract theory and discusses the proposed provisions in UCITA for such contracts. The second portion traces the history of legal rights in the music industry including the "exclusive rights," the First Sale Doctrine, and the Fair Use Defense. In the third portion, the author suggests that such licensing contracts are legally unenforceable for either want of consideration or failure to provide meaningful opportunity to assent. The article culminates with a recommendation for legislators to enact certain, relevant portions of UCITA and recommendations for the music industry about how to bring their licensing scheme within the aims and legality of contract law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Intellectual Property
Journal of Intellectual Property Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: The Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property is a student-run publication. The Journal''s mission is to present articles that analyze the fundamental issues affecting intellectual property rights, the changing climate of different areas of intellectual property especially related to advances in technology, and issues and opinions surrounding recent judicial opinions and how they may affect the future of intellectual property rights, among others. The Journal accepts submissions from all levels of authors including law students, professors and academics, and practicing professionals. Articles accepted for publication may cover any area of intellectual property including patents, copyrights, trademarks, and trade secrets.
期刊最新文献
Two Centuries of Trademark and Copyright Law: A Citation-Network-Analysis Approach The Confusion of Trademark Territoriality A Court Divided Chasing Echoes of Obscenity Exceptionalism in Copyright: Recent Swarm Cases Procrastination at the Patent Office?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1