“反对堕胎,而不是反对妇女”

IF 0.3 Q4 ANTHROPOLOGY Anthropological Journal of European Cultures Pub Date : 2018-09-01 DOI:10.3167/AJEC.2018.270203
Michele Rivkin-Fish
{"title":"“反对堕胎,而不是反对妇女”","authors":"Michele Rivkin-Fish","doi":"10.3167/AJEC.2018.270203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article traces the conceptual emergence and development of\nfeminist-oriented abortion politics in urban Russia between 2011\nand 2015. Examined as an example of local adaptions of global\nreproductive rights movements, Russians’ advocacy for abortion\naccess reflects commitments and tensions characterising post-Soviet\nfeminism. Specifically, I show how calls to preserve women’s access\nto legal abortion have drawn on both socialist-inspired ideals of state\nsupport for families and liberal-oriented ideas of individual autonomy.\nAttention to the logics underlying abortion activists’ rhetoric\nreveals the specific historical sensibilities and shifting cultural values\nat stake in the ways progressive Russian activists construe justice.\nThe analytic concept of ‘moral economy’ brings into relief how their\nadvocacy evokes ideal visions of reciprocal obligations and uncertainties\nin both state-citizen relations and intimate relations. I argue\nthat contextualised analyses of local feminist abortion politics may\nenrich global debates for reproductive rights and justice.","PeriodicalId":43124,"journal":{"name":"Anthropological Journal of European Cultures","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Fight Abortion, Not Women’\",\"authors\":\"Michele Rivkin-Fish\",\"doi\":\"10.3167/AJEC.2018.270203\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article traces the conceptual emergence and development of\\nfeminist-oriented abortion politics in urban Russia between 2011\\nand 2015. Examined as an example of local adaptions of global\\nreproductive rights movements, Russians’ advocacy for abortion\\naccess reflects commitments and tensions characterising post-Soviet\\nfeminism. Specifically, I show how calls to preserve women’s access\\nto legal abortion have drawn on both socialist-inspired ideals of state\\nsupport for families and liberal-oriented ideas of individual autonomy.\\nAttention to the logics underlying abortion activists’ rhetoric\\nreveals the specific historical sensibilities and shifting cultural values\\nat stake in the ways progressive Russian activists construe justice.\\nThe analytic concept of ‘moral economy’ brings into relief how their\\nadvocacy evokes ideal visions of reciprocal obligations and uncertainties\\nin both state-citizen relations and intimate relations. I argue\\nthat contextualised analyses of local feminist abortion politics may\\nenrich global debates for reproductive rights and justice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43124,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anthropological Journal of European Cultures\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anthropological Journal of European Cultures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3167/AJEC.2018.270203\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropological Journal of European Cultures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/AJEC.2018.270203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文追溯了2011 - 2015年俄罗斯城市女性主义堕胎政治的概念产生与发展。作为全球生育权利运动在当地的适应范例,俄罗斯人对堕胎的支持反映了后苏联女权主义的承诺和紧张关系。具体来说,我展示了保护妇女获得合法堕胎的呼吁是如何利用社会主义启发的国家支持家庭的理想和自由主义导向的个人自治思想的。关注堕胎活动家的修辞背后的逻辑,揭示了进步的俄罗斯活动家解释正义的方式所涉及的特定的历史敏感性和不断变化的文化价值。“道德经济”的分析概念揭示了他们的主张是如何唤起国家-公民关系和亲密关系中互惠义务和不确定性的理想愿景的。我认为,对当地女权主义堕胎政治的语境化分析可能会丰富全球关于生殖权利和正义的辩论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
‘Fight Abortion, Not Women’
This article traces the conceptual emergence and development of feminist-oriented abortion politics in urban Russia between 2011 and 2015. Examined as an example of local adaptions of global reproductive rights movements, Russians’ advocacy for abortion access reflects commitments and tensions characterising post-Soviet feminism. Specifically, I show how calls to preserve women’s access to legal abortion have drawn on both socialist-inspired ideals of state support for families and liberal-oriented ideas of individual autonomy. Attention to the logics underlying abortion activists’ rhetoric reveals the specific historical sensibilities and shifting cultural values at stake in the ways progressive Russian activists construe justice. The analytic concept of ‘moral economy’ brings into relief how their advocacy evokes ideal visions of reciprocal obligations and uncertainties in both state-citizen relations and intimate relations. I argue that contextualised analyses of local feminist abortion politics may enrich global debates for reproductive rights and justice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Editorial Response to Issue 32(1) on Materialities of Age & Ageing The Enchanted North Pnina Werbner #Vanlife Hiking the Via Alpina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1