大学生对教育活动中技术使用的认知与投入的脑力劳动

IF 3.4 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Ried-Revista Iberoamericana De Educacion a Distancia Pub Date : 2022-04-14 DOI:10.5944/ried.25.2.32714
Julio Cabero-Almenara, Sandra Martínez-Pérez, Juan-Jesús Gutiérrez-Castillo, Antonio Palacios-Rodríguez
{"title":"大学生对教育活动中技术使用的认知与投入的脑力劳动","authors":"Julio Cabero-Almenara, Sandra Martínez-Pérez, Juan-Jesús Gutiérrez-Castillo, Antonio Palacios-Rodríguez","doi":"10.5944/ried.25.2.32714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Different generations (digital natives, resident students, generation Y, X, or Z) show a preference towards technologies and the digital world. This \"ex-post-facto\" study is presented to learn the preferences that university students have regarding the use of different resources for various educational activities, as well as the investment of mental effort and perceived ease of learning concerning different means and technological resources. The sampling used is non-probabilistic, conventional, and intentional. 2,148 university students from different scientific fields of twelve Spanish public universities participate in it. To do this, an \"ad hoc\" instrument is designed whose data show high reliability and validity indices. The results indicate that students tend to have different perceptions regarding the various means and resources presented, in terms of the level of mental effort needed, along with the degree of easiness to learn through them. In this sense, the casuistry of the results is discussed and compared with the theory of mental effort proposed by Salomon (1981). The findings can be explained by the result of the interaction of three elements: the symbolic systems mobilized to elaborate messages, the message, and the technology that packages, formalizes, and transmits them. In the same way, it concludes by discussing the applicability of the results for the improvement of the digital competence of the students.","PeriodicalId":45698,"journal":{"name":"Ried-Revista Iberoamericana De Educacion a Distancia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"University Students’ Perceptions of the Use of Technologies in Educational Activities and Mental Effort Invested\",\"authors\":\"Julio Cabero-Almenara, Sandra Martínez-Pérez, Juan-Jesús Gutiérrez-Castillo, Antonio Palacios-Rodríguez\",\"doi\":\"10.5944/ried.25.2.32714\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Different generations (digital natives, resident students, generation Y, X, or Z) show a preference towards technologies and the digital world. This \\\"ex-post-facto\\\" study is presented to learn the preferences that university students have regarding the use of different resources for various educational activities, as well as the investment of mental effort and perceived ease of learning concerning different means and technological resources. The sampling used is non-probabilistic, conventional, and intentional. 2,148 university students from different scientific fields of twelve Spanish public universities participate in it. To do this, an \\\"ad hoc\\\" instrument is designed whose data show high reliability and validity indices. The results indicate that students tend to have different perceptions regarding the various means and resources presented, in terms of the level of mental effort needed, along with the degree of easiness to learn through them. In this sense, the casuistry of the results is discussed and compared with the theory of mental effort proposed by Salomon (1981). The findings can be explained by the result of the interaction of three elements: the symbolic systems mobilized to elaborate messages, the message, and the technology that packages, formalizes, and transmits them. In the same way, it concludes by discussing the applicability of the results for the improvement of the digital competence of the students.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ried-Revista Iberoamericana De Educacion a Distancia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ried-Revista Iberoamericana De Educacion a Distancia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.25.2.32714\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ried-Revista Iberoamericana De Educacion a Distancia","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.25.2.32714","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

不同的世代(数字原生代、常驻学生、Y世代、X世代或Z世代)表现出对技术和数字世界的偏好。本“事后”研究旨在了解大学生在各种教育活动中对不同资源的使用偏好,以及在不同手段和技术资源下的智力投入和感知学习的容易程度。使用的抽样是非概率的、常规的和有意的。来自西班牙12所公立大学不同科学领域的2148名大学生参加了该项目。为此,设计了一种“特设”仪器,其数据具有较高的信度和效度指标。结果表明,就所需的脑力努力程度以及通过这些手段学习的容易程度而言,学生往往对所提供的各种手段和资源有不同的看法。在这个意义上,讨论了结果的诡辩性,并与所罗门(1981)提出的心理努力理论进行了比较。这一发现可以用三个因素相互作用的结果来解释:用来阐述信息的符号系统,信息本身,以及包装、形式化和传播信息的技术。最后讨论了研究结果对提高学生数字化能力的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
University Students’ Perceptions of the Use of Technologies in Educational Activities and Mental Effort Invested
Different generations (digital natives, resident students, generation Y, X, or Z) show a preference towards technologies and the digital world. This "ex-post-facto" study is presented to learn the preferences that university students have regarding the use of different resources for various educational activities, as well as the investment of mental effort and perceived ease of learning concerning different means and technological resources. The sampling used is non-probabilistic, conventional, and intentional. 2,148 university students from different scientific fields of twelve Spanish public universities participate in it. To do this, an "ad hoc" instrument is designed whose data show high reliability and validity indices. The results indicate that students tend to have different perceptions regarding the various means and resources presented, in terms of the level of mental effort needed, along with the degree of easiness to learn through them. In this sense, the casuistry of the results is discussed and compared with the theory of mental effort proposed by Salomon (1981). The findings can be explained by the result of the interaction of three elements: the symbolic systems mobilized to elaborate messages, the message, and the technology that packages, formalizes, and transmits them. In the same way, it concludes by discussing the applicability of the results for the improvement of the digital competence of the students.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ried-Revista Iberoamericana De Educacion a Distancia
Ried-Revista Iberoamericana De Educacion a Distancia EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
18
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evidencias de aprendizaje en prácticas educativas mediadas por tecnologías digitales Gamificación, pandemia y aprendizaje de la historia de las ideas. Experimentos en el contexto Core Currículum Estrategias de aprendizaje de estudiantes de Ingeniería en línea Digital Cognitive Maps for Scientific Knowledge Construction in Initial Teacher Education Realidad virtual para enseñar reanimación cardiopulmonar en el Grado de Educación Primaria. Estudio comparativo
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1