Mohammad Amin Al- Manasyeh Mohammad Amin Al- Manasyeh
{"title":"The rule of meeting for Friday Lesson between following and fabrication  \"Jurisprudence fundamentalism study\": حكم الاجتماع لدرس الجمعة بين الاتباع والابتداع \" دراسة أصولية فقهية \"","authors":"Mohammad Amin Al- Manasyeh Mohammad Amin Al- Manasyeh","doi":"10.26389/ajsrp.m181121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to indicate the ruling of the meeting for the study before Friday according to an authentic methodology based on modern, fundamentalist, doctrinal and purpose aspects. The study adopted a complex approach of descriptive and analytical approaches based on extrapolation and comparison, taking into account the steps and conditions of scientific research used in Islamic studies. After examining the merits of the meeting to examine Friday between the followers and the innovation of evidence and objections, it was found that it was permissible to say that it was permissible, both in terms of the validity and preponderance of the evidentiary orientation, in terms of the strength and implications of the evidence and its implications for the purpose, and documents that emerged through a set of evidence; fundamentalism and jurisprudence.","PeriodicalId":17009,"journal":{"name":"journal of sciences islamic republic of iran","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"journal of sciences islamic republic of iran","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26389/ajsrp.m181121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在根据基于现代、原教旨主义、教义和目的方面的真实方法论,指出周五之前学习的会议规则。这项研究采用了基于外推和比较的复杂的描述和分析方法,同时考虑到伊斯兰研究中使用的科学研究的步骤和条件。在审查了周五在追随者之间的会议的优点以及证据和反对意见的创新之后,发现可以允许说它是允许的,无论是在证据方向的有效性和优势方面,还是在证据的强度和含义以及它对目的的含义方面,以及通过一系列证据出现的文件;原教旨主义和法理学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The rule of meeting for Friday Lesson between following and fabrication  "Jurisprudence fundamentalism study": حكم الاجتماع لدرس الجمعة بين الاتباع والابتداع " دراسة أصولية فقهية "
This research aims to indicate the ruling of the meeting for the study before Friday according to an authentic methodology based on modern, fundamentalist, doctrinal and purpose aspects. The study adopted a complex approach of descriptive and analytical approaches based on extrapolation and comparison, taking into account the steps and conditions of scientific research used in Islamic studies. After examining the merits of the meeting to examine Friday between the followers and the innovation of evidence and objections, it was found that it was permissible to say that it was permissible, both in terms of the validity and preponderance of the evidentiary orientation, in terms of the strength and implications of the evidence and its implications for the purpose, and documents that emerged through a set of evidence; fundamentalism and jurisprudence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
journal of sciences islamic republic of iran
journal of sciences islamic republic of iran Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The method of Imam Al-Damiry (D. 808 AH) in Al-Jarh and Al-Ta’deel through his book Al-Najm Al-Wahaj fi explain Al-Minhaj ما يُخْرَجُ مِنْ رَأْسِ المَالِ، وما يُخْرَجُ مِنْ الثُّلُثِ ضوابط العمارة في القرآن الكريم الإمام إسماعيل بن القاسم ومخطوطه (مسألة طلاق الدور): دراسة وتحقيق ابن مظفر اليمني وكتابه الكواكب النيرة (دراسة وتحقيق بابي الرجعة والاختلاف)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1