用重量分析法测定粉尘暴露的过滤器制备技术

A. Sass-Kortsak, C. Tracy, J. Purdham
{"title":"用重量分析法测定粉尘暴露的过滤器制备技术","authors":"A. Sass-Kortsak, C. Tracy, J. Purdham","doi":"10.1080/08828032.1989.10388567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Gravimetric analyses are frequently used to measure worker exposure to airborne particulate. In this study, two filter conditioning methods, designed to overcome moisture effects, were compared using two different filter media. Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) filters were used to sample wood dust and cork dust. Mixed cellulose ester (MCE) membrane filters were also used to sample cork dust. For each filter, pre- and postsampling weights were each determined twice: after conditioning for 48 hours in a silica gel dessicator and after being placed in an incubator set at 27°C and a nominal relative humidity of 50 percent. When MCE membrane filters were used, a statistically significant difference between conditioning methods was found in filter preweights. When PVC filters were used, weight differences between the two conditioning methods was found to be insignificant and considered potentially less important than differences due to material loss. Dessication of filters prior to weighing may result in incre...","PeriodicalId":8049,"journal":{"name":"Applied Industrial Hygiene","volume":"56 1","pages":"222-226"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Filter Preparation Techniques for Dust Exposure Determination by Gravimetric Analysis\",\"authors\":\"A. Sass-Kortsak, C. Tracy, J. Purdham\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08828032.1989.10388567\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Gravimetric analyses are frequently used to measure worker exposure to airborne particulate. In this study, two filter conditioning methods, designed to overcome moisture effects, were compared using two different filter media. Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) filters were used to sample wood dust and cork dust. Mixed cellulose ester (MCE) membrane filters were also used to sample cork dust. For each filter, pre- and postsampling weights were each determined twice: after conditioning for 48 hours in a silica gel dessicator and after being placed in an incubator set at 27°C and a nominal relative humidity of 50 percent. When MCE membrane filters were used, a statistically significant difference between conditioning methods was found in filter preweights. When PVC filters were used, weight differences between the two conditioning methods was found to be insignificant and considered potentially less important than differences due to material loss. Dessication of filters prior to weighing may result in incre...\",\"PeriodicalId\":8049,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Industrial Hygiene\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"222-226\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Industrial Hygiene\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08828032.1989.10388567\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Industrial Hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08828032.1989.10388567","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要重量分析法经常用于测量工人对空气中颗粒物的暴露。在本研究中,采用两种不同的过滤介质,比较了两种旨在克服水分影响的过滤调节方法。聚氯乙烯(PVC)过滤器用于采样木粉尘和软木粉尘。混合纤维素酯(MCE)膜过滤器也用于软木粉尘的取样。对于每个过滤器,采样前和采样后的权重分别测定两次:在硅胶干燥器中调理48小时后,以及在27°C和50%标称相对湿度的培养箱中放置后。当使用MCE膜过滤器时,不同的调节方法在过滤器预权重上有统计学上的显著差异。当使用PVC过滤器时,发现两种调节方法之间的重量差异微不足道,并且认为可能比材料损失造成的差异更重要。称重前过滤器干燥可能导致增加…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Filter Preparation Techniques for Dust Exposure Determination by Gravimetric Analysis
Abstract Gravimetric analyses are frequently used to measure worker exposure to airborne particulate. In this study, two filter conditioning methods, designed to overcome moisture effects, were compared using two different filter media. Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) filters were used to sample wood dust and cork dust. Mixed cellulose ester (MCE) membrane filters were also used to sample cork dust. For each filter, pre- and postsampling weights were each determined twice: after conditioning for 48 hours in a silica gel dessicator and after being placed in an incubator set at 27°C and a nominal relative humidity of 50 percent. When MCE membrane filters were used, a statistically significant difference between conditioning methods was found in filter preweights. When PVC filters were used, weight differences between the two conditioning methods was found to be insignificant and considered potentially less important than differences due to material loss. Dessication of filters prior to weighing may result in incre...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Asbestos—Analytical Techniques Exposures to Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) Electromagnetic Fields in Occupations with Elevated Leukemia Rates Focus on …: Air Sampling: Sampling and Analysis of Air Contaminants: An Overview Major Accomplishments in Occupational Health in the past Fifty Years Air Sampling Instruments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1