前进还是落后:“以人为本”的东盟的公众参与状况

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES Journal of Asian Public Policy Pub Date : 2021-11-01 DOI:10.1080/17516234.2021.1998948
Christopher L. Atkinson, Mandy L. Mahaffey
{"title":"前进还是落后:“以人为本”的东盟的公众参与状况","authors":"Christopher L. Atkinson, Mandy L. Mahaffey","doi":"10.1080/17516234.2021.1998948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) has historically relied upon state-centred approaches to governance. However, there have been a number of instances where ASEAN has sought to shift to, or at least signal value in, people-centred approaches to governance. Notably, there is a range of approaches within ASEAN nations towards human rights. This paper considers people-centred and public-participation initiatives in ASEAN conceptually, and analyses the potential to realize the goals contained in policy ideals as stated by ASEAN. The rhetoric of people-centrism serves more as gaslighting than real opportunity for people to impact public discourse and the region’s future.","PeriodicalId":45051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asian Public Policy","volume":"99 1","pages":"332 - 349"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Forging ahead or falling behind: the state of public participation in a ‘people-centred’ ASEAN\",\"authors\":\"Christopher L. Atkinson, Mandy L. Mahaffey\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17516234.2021.1998948\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) has historically relied upon state-centred approaches to governance. However, there have been a number of instances where ASEAN has sought to shift to, or at least signal value in, people-centred approaches to governance. Notably, there is a range of approaches within ASEAN nations towards human rights. This paper considers people-centred and public-participation initiatives in ASEAN conceptually, and analyses the potential to realize the goals contained in policy ideals as stated by ASEAN. The rhetoric of people-centrism serves more as gaslighting than real opportunity for people to impact public discourse and the region’s future.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Asian Public Policy\",\"volume\":\"99 1\",\"pages\":\"332 - 349\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Asian Public Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2021.1998948\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asian Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2021.1998948","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

东南亚国家联盟(ASEAN)历来依赖以国家为中心的治理方式。然而,在许多情况下,东盟已经寻求转向,或至少表明价值,以人为本的治理方法。值得注意的是,东盟国家在人权问题上采取了一系列措施。本文从概念上考虑了东盟以人为本和公众参与的倡议,并分析了东盟政策理想中所包含目标的实现潜力。“以人为本”的花言巧语更多地充当了燃气灯,而不是让人们影响公共话语和该地区未来的真正机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Forging ahead or falling behind: the state of public participation in a ‘people-centred’ ASEAN
ABSTRACT The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) has historically relied upon state-centred approaches to governance. However, there have been a number of instances where ASEAN has sought to shift to, or at least signal value in, people-centred approaches to governance. Notably, there is a range of approaches within ASEAN nations towards human rights. This paper considers people-centred and public-participation initiatives in ASEAN conceptually, and analyses the potential to realize the goals contained in policy ideals as stated by ASEAN. The rhetoric of people-centrism serves more as gaslighting than real opportunity for people to impact public discourse and the region’s future.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
The effect of incentives and procedure simplification in policy implementation: evidence from a survey experiment on waste sorting Situated usage of generative AI in policy education: implications for teaching, learning, and research Scaling up policy entrepreneurship strategies from the local to the national level: the unlikely rise of basic income from agenda universe to decision agenda Unveiling the impact of policy entrepreneurs on South Korea’s social economy: a media analysis Digital regulation, enforcement attitudes, and discretionary decision-making of regulatory street-level bureaucrats during a pandemic emergency: an experimental study in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1